TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Attorneys on both sides of a lawsuit dealing with the Kansas Supreme Court’s administrative power are conceding that legislators have some say in judicial operations.

The high court heard arguments Thursday about a 2014 law that strips it of its authority to appoint the chief judges in the state’s 31 judicial districts and gives it to local judges.

The Legislature passed another law earlier this year nullifying the court system’s entire budget if the policy change is struck down.

Attorney Pedro Irigonegaray represents a chief judge who sued over last year’s law and said it interferes with the Supreme Court’s power under the state constitution to administer the courts.

But Irigonegaray acknowledged that lawmakers had the authority to create chief judgeships and even describe their general duties.

———–

TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — The Kansas Supreme Court is taking up a case dealing with its administrative power that could jeopardize the judiciary’s entire budget.

The high court hears arguments Thursday on a 2014 law that strips it of its authority to appoint the chief judges in the state’s 31 judicial districts. The law gave the power to local judges.

A Shawnee County judge ruled the law improperly infringed on the administrative power granted to the Supreme Court under the state constitution. The state appealed.

The Republican-controlled Legislature passed a new law earlier this year nullifying the court system’s entire budget through June 2017 if the policy change is struck down.

Chief Justice Lawton Nuss criticized last year’s law on the high court’s behalf and has removed himself from the case.