Happy New Year, Kansans! A new legislative session begins soon, and troubled state finances once again top the agenda. Kansas staggers forward in a perpetual budget crisis that our lawmakers have been unable—or unwilling—to solve.
The basic problem is simple. Kansas does not have enough income to meet expenses.
The cause of the problem stems directly from the Brownback income tax cuts. Those tax policy changes indisputably led to a sharp decline in the state’s revenue stream. As a result, in the last three years, Kansas has consistently spent more than it takes in, a practice that makes the state poorer and poorer.
At first, lawmakers made up the difference between declining income and growing expenses by drawing down cash reserves. A $709 million bank balance went to zero in less than two years.
With the bank account empty, lawmakers began drawing hundreds of millions from other state government accounts. The highway fund has been the prime target, but many other funds, including those set aside for early childhood programs and economic development, were also sacrificed in the attempt to keep the general fund solvent.
Of course, lawmakers also tried hard to cut expenses. Funding for public schools, a prime responsibility of the state, has been pulled down far below where it should be. State hospitals and prisons remain understaffed. The current budget slashes planned maintenance on roads and bridges. Yet, even these efforts have not lowered expenses nearly enough to make them fit within the dramatically diminished revenue stream.
The budget imbalance became so acute last year that even conservative lawmakers voted to raise the sales tax rate, a move that further shifted the state’s tax burden to low- and middle-income Kansans. The sales tax increase improved the overall revenue stream, but it did not come close to solving the problem.
The Brownback tax cuts brought the revenue stream down so significantly that truly damaging expense cuts coupled with a sales tax increase have not repaired the budgetary mess.
The financial problem and its cause are easy to identify, and so is the solution. Revisit the income tax cuts, which were far too deep.
Don’t expect that, though.
Gov. Brownback has announced that he does not want to deal with any tax changes this session. Nor do the conservative legislators who voted to raise the sales tax. 2016 is an election year for all members of the Legislature, so many would prefer that Kansans forget what happened in the last legislative session. It’s also unlikely that expenses will go down. In their latest gambit to lower spending, lawmakers voted to pay a consulting firm $2.6 million to find “efficiencies” for them. The results are not all in, but the early recommendations from the contractor suggest selling KDOT woodchippers and paying bills late—a very inauspicious start.
When baseball great Yogi Berra died in September, the media replayed many of his famous witticisms. A favorite, “It’s like déjà vu all over again,” was reportedly first uttered by Yogi when Mickey Mantle and Roger Maris repeatedly hit back-to-back home runs in the 1961 season. Yogi didn’t know it then, but his phrase applies to the Kansas budget now.
Another year. Another budget crisis. Déjà vu. If our lawmakers again avoid the real solution by taking even more money from the highway fund, or by borrowing, or by exercising “creative accounting,” and if we buy the governor’s recent declaration that “we are going to be in good shape,” then Kansas will arrive at January 2017 with yet another budget crisis. But our state will be poorer and another year behind. It will be like déjà vu all over again.
Duane Goossen is a Senior Fellow at the Kansas Center for Economic Growth and formerly served 12 years as Kansas Budget Director.
Gene Policinski is senior vice president of the First Amendment Center.
What a strange, challenging and dangerous year it was for First Amendment freedoms, at home and abroad.
2015 was but seven days old when terrorists, claiming to be angry over the publishing of satirical drawings of the Muslim prophet Mohammed, burst into the offices of the French weekly magazine Charlie Hebdo, killing 12 people.
The tragedy sparked a worldwide outpouring of support for free expression — remember the signs and t-shirts declaring “Je suis Charlie” — I am Charlie? But the incident also prompted draconian proposals in France to limit certain kinds of free expression and new restrictions on Muslims simply because of their religious faith. And Nov. 13 attacks in Paris in which 130 died only added fuel to that.
As the year unfolded, free expression in the United States took a hit in the most unlikely places — at least to the Boomer generation which carried the protest banners in the 1960s of the “free speech movement”: Colleges and universities. Campus critics assailed everything from ideas and opinions they believe may make some uncomfortable, to professorial musings on subjects from gender to Halloween costumes, to the notion of inviting speakers with controversial or even repugnant views.
And at some schools — most visibly, at the University of Missouri, the home to a venerable journalism program — demonstrators against racism and bigotry assaulted freedom of the press even as they exercised their rights of free speech, assembly and petition. A group of activists including students and a few faculty members tried to keep student journalists from reporting on the protests at the public university — producing both a memorable pair of online videos capturing the confrontations, and perhaps the year’s best public example of the meaning of “irony” if not civic ignorance.
On the World Wide Web front, the ongoing War on Terror produced proposals to restrict or deny use of the Internet by groups like ISIS and raised again the old notion of banning “hate speech” from public discourse. The proposals came from both conservatives and liberals, who supported such censorious activity for reasons as varied as national security, public safety or simply as the means to purge unpopular or negative views from the “marketplace” of ideas.
Internet giants such as Facebook, You Tube and Twitter already have implemented strategies to take down posts by ISIS killers and recruiters using images of unspeakable violence to promote their views and recruit new followers. But there were calls for even more social media sanitizing to counter the sophisticated online strategies of militant groups promising earthly rewards and an eternal paradise.
Taking down videos of brutal murders beheadings and rants about killing Westerners are relatively easy calls. But Eric Schmidt, who leads Google, went a step further than most in voicing the idea of an algorithm that would relentlessly prowl the corridors of the Web searching and eliminating hateful speech — an Orwellian concept of censorship-by-technology that went even further than “1984” author George Orwell imagined.
In November, leading Democratic and Republican candidates for their party’s presidential nominations called for various kinds of “Silicon Valley solutions” to terrorists on social media — while mocking those who would raise First Amendment objections to silencing speakers as an alternative to producing positive messages and dealing with social and political issues being exploited by ISIS and others.
The year ended with the specter of journalists’ deaths again in headlines.
On Dec. 21, GOP front-running candidate Donald Trump mockingly discussed killing reporters (“I hate some of these people”) at a Grand Rapids, Mich., rally, to the laughter of some attending. He questioned reports that Russia had murdered some journalists, and said “I would never do that … It’s horrible,” but then finished with the observation “some of them are such lying, disgusting people.”
Just a few days laters came the annual, somber reports by the Committee to Protect Journalists and by Reporter Without Borders on the numbers of journalist worldwide jailed or killed in 2015. The CPJ report noted that “of 69 journalists killed for their work in 2015, 40 percent died at the hands of Islamic militant groups such as Al-Qaeda and Islamic State. More than two-thirds of the total killed were singled out for murder,” rather than dying in accidents or as the result of military conflict.
Freedom House reported in its 2015 annual report that “global press freedom declined … to its lowest point in more than 10 years. The rate of decline also accelerated drastically,” with just 14% of the world’s population living in nations “where coverage of political news is robust, the safety of journalists is guaranteed, state intrusion in media affairs is minimal and the press is not subject to onerous legal or economic pressures.”
Even on New Year’s Eve, free expression was under assault. There were reports that the various Web sites and digital services operated worldwide by the BBC — the international news operation headquartered in London — faced cyberattacks that blocked or crippled operations throughout the day.
The 2016 presidential election seems certain to raise again the First Amendment-grounded debate over restrictions on campaign spending and contributions and attempts to reverse the 2010 U.S. Supreme Court’s “Citizens United” decision removing most limits on spending by corporations and unions.
Some First Amendment experts are now open to modifying a long-standing barrier to government suppression of free speech that is not a “clear and present danger” in light of the new and pervasive ability via social media and the Web to provide a far-reaching platform for those promoting negative messages.
The new year starts with “atmospherics” as measured by public opinion polls that are not kind to protecting First Amendment freedoms, from reports that a sizable number of Millennials have no problem with government officials or the Pentagon reviewing or controlling a free press and free speech in the name of public safety, to a survey showing overall faith in democratic ideals is fading among younger voters.
Still, a large majority of Americans — in the Newseum Institute’s annual State of the First Amendment annual survey — do not see those core freedoms as “going too far in the rights they protect.” And as the late founder of the Institute’s First Amendment Center, John Seigenthaler, observed: “First Amendment freedoms are never secured but are always in the process of being made secure.”
Keep that last thought in mind, in 2016. Happy New Year.
Gene Policinski is chief operating officer of the Newseum Institute and senior vice president of the Institute’s First Amendment Center. He can be reached at [email protected]. Follow him on Twitter: @genefac
Hays, Kansas resident Leland W. McGuire age 96, died Wednesday, December 30, 2015 at his home in Hays.
He was born July 16, 1919 in Mingo, Kansas, the son of John L. & Mable R. (Trowbridge) McGuire. He was a farmer and a truck driver.
Survivors include his wife, Faye of the home; sons, Larry McGuire of Branson, MO, James McGuire of Chapman, KS, Eddy McGuire of Phillipsburg and Kurtis Hunziker of Hays, KS; 3 daughters, Judy Hopson of Holcomb, KS, JoLene Bay of Kansas City, MO and Jacqueline Ausmas of McKinney, TX; two brothers, Don McGuire of Bartlesville, OK and Harvey McGuire of Oakley, KS; 5 sisters, Marthanell Turley of Scott City, KS, Retah Lemmons of Oakley, Lue Ellegood of Oakley, Elizabeth Salters of Stockton, MO and Velda Cox of Wichita, KS; 18 grandchildren; and 26 great grandchildren.
Funeral services will be held as 11:00 a.m. Tuesday, January 5, 2016 at the Wesleyan Church in Oakley, KS with Pastor Clyde Graham officiating. Burial will follow in the Pyramid View Cemetery, Gove County, KS, with Military Honors conducted by the Fort Riley Honor Guard.
Mr. McGuire will lie in state on Monday, January 4, 2016 in the Olliff-Boeve Memorial Chapel, 1115 2nd Street, Phillipsburg, KS 67661 from noon until 9:00 p.m.
Memorial contributions may be made to the Oakley V.F.W.
The funeral service for lifelong Sherman County, Kansas, resident Lucille Fenner, 86, will be held Wednesday, January 6, 2:00 PM MT at First Baptist Church in Goodland. Interment will be in the Goodland Cemetery.
Friends may share respects Wednesday, January 6, one hour prior to the service at the First Baptist Church in Goodland.
Memorials may be made to Lucille Fenner Memorial and may be left at the services or mailed to Koons Funeral Home, 211 North Main, Goodland, KS 67735-1555.
Listen to Mike Cooper interviewing Dr. Jeff Curtis from Medical Specialists, at HaysMed with the topic of “Blood Thinners” by clicking the link above and then clicking the play button
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas lawmakers have approved a six-month contract with a software company that was criticized for technical delays last year.
The Legislative Coordinating Council this week approved a $293,488 contract for Propylon, a Dublin-based technology firm with a U.S. office in Lawrence. The company will perform technical support and upgrades for the Legislature’s custom software.
The Wichita Eagle reports legislative leaders complained during the last session that software problems slowed down the legislative process and delayed votes. The contract was under review since July.
The state has paid Proplyon about $16 million since 2005 to construct and maintain the Kansas Legislative Information System and Services portal. It is used for writing, researching and publishing bills.
The new contract, which lasts through June, includes measures to ensure greater accountability.
Listen as ‘Voice of the Chiefs’ Mitch Holthus takes a look back at the Chiefs road win over the Baltimore Ravens and previews tomorrow’s home game with Johnny Football and the Cleveland Browns.
The Holthus Hotline airs Saturday at 6:30 a.m. during the Chiefs season.
Gene Policinski is senior vice president of the First Amendment Center.
Our First Amendment freedoms will work — if we still have them around to use.
Those five freedoms — religion, speech, press, assembly and petition — have been challenged at various times in our nation’s history, as many would say they are today. But the very freedoms themselves provide the means and mechanisms for our society to self-correct those challenges, perhaps a main reason why the First Amendment has endured, unchanged, since Dec. 15, 1791.
Case in point: The tragic mass shooting in Orlando, Florida, on June 12 was followed by a burst of anti-Islamic rhetoric across the country after the killer declared allegiance to ISIS. The speech, however hateful, generally was protected by the First Amendment.
But in turn, those attacks were followed by pushback in the other direction. Muslim leaders decried the use of their faith to justify hatred of the United States or homophobic terrorism. Opposition was ramped up to the idea of increased surveillance of Muslims in America and now-President-elect Donald Trump’s suggestion for a temporary ban on Muslims entering the United States.
In two rounds of national polling in the Newseum Institute’s annual State of the First Amendment survey, support for First Amendment protection for “fringe or extreme faiths” actually increased after the Orlando attack, compared with sampling done in May.
The number of people who said First Amendment protection does not extend to such faiths dropped from 29 to 22 percent. In both surveys, just over 1,000 adults were sampled by telephone, and the margin of error in the surveys was plus or minus 3.2 percentage points.
The First Amendment is predicated on the notion that citizens who are able to freely debate — without government censorship or direction — will exchange views, sometimes strongly and on controversial subjects, but eventually find common ground.
Of course, that kind of vigorous and robust exchange in the marketplace only can happen if there is a “marketplace” — freedom for all to speak — and a willingness to join with others in serious discussion, debate and discourse that has a goal of improving life for us all.
Here’s where the survey results turn ominous: Nearly four in 10 of those questioned in the 2016 State of the First Amendment survey, which was released July 4, could not name unaided a single freedom in the First Amendment.
Perhaps not identifying by name even one of the five freedoms is not the same as not knowing you have those core freedoms. But neither does the result build confidence that, as a nation, we have a deep understanding of what distinguishes our nation among all others and is so fundamental to the unique American experience of self-governance.
We have thrived as a nation with a social order and a government structure in which the exchange of views is a key to solving problems. The nation’s architects had a confidence and optimism that such exchanges in the so-called “marketplace of ideas” would ultimately work for the public good.
What would those founders think of a society in which so many seem to favor the electronic versions of divided “marketplaces” that permit only that speech of which you already approve or that confirms your existing views?
Or worse yet, a society in which the five freedoms are used as weapons — from cyberbullying to mass Twitter attacks to deliberate distribution of “fake news” — to figuratively set ablaze or tear down an opponent’s stand?
As a nation, we cannot abandon the values of our First Amendment freedoms that protect religious liberty, that defend free expression at its widest definition and that provide a right to unpopular dissent, without fundamentally changing the character of our nation.
As a people, we must stand in defense of the values set out in the First Amendment and Bill of Rights some 225 years ago, even as we face one of the deepest public divides on a range of issues in our history.
And we must revisit and renew our faith in a concept expressed in 1664 by English poet and scholar John Milton and later woven deep into the institutional fabric of America: that in a battle between truth and falsehood, “who ever knew truth put to the worse in a free and open encounter?”
This column first appeared on Dec. 15, Bill of Rights Day, in a special report in The Washington Times.
Gene Policinski is chief operating officer of the Newseum Institute and senior vice president of the Institute’s First Amendment Center. [email protected]
The Downtown Hays Development Corp. has announced its new Board of Directors for the term beginning January 2016.
The roster includes newly elected board member Dax McLoughlin, who fills an unfinished term, and returning board members Sarah Cearley, Alaina Cunningham, Karen Dreiling, Holly Haynes, Kim Hodny, Sandy Jacobs, Elodie Jones, Justin McClung, Dustin Roths, Eddie Perrett, Andrew Rupp and Jason Williby.
The DHDC will also have a new executive slate, taking its role at the annual meeting in January. The new officers are Sandy Jacobs, president; Justin McClung, vice president; Holly Haynes, secretary; Eddie Perrett, treasurer; and Andrew Rupp, past president.
In February, DHDC will relocate its office from The Welcome Center, 2700 Vine, to 109 E. 11th in downtown Hays.
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Department of Homeland Security is planning nationwide raids aimed at deporting adults and children who have already been ordered removed by an immigration judge.
The Washington Post says the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement operation would begin as soon as January and would likely affect hundreds of immigrants who fled violence in Central America.
An ICE spokeswoman said Thursday that the agency focuses on individuals “who pose a threat to national security, public safety and border security,” including those who have been caught trying to illegally enter the U.S. and those who have been ordered removed from the country since January 2014.
The Obama administration disclosed this week that in the 2015 budget year, the U.S. deported the fewest immigrants since 2006.
The annual meeting for members and partners of the Downtown Hays Development Corporation will be held Wed., Jan. 11, 2017, at the Golden Griddle, 230 W. 9th beginning at 11 a.m.
The agenda includes a report of officers, the 2016 year in review and any necessary business.
The 2017 Board of Directors are: Joslyn Brungardt, Sarah Cearley, Alaina Cunningham, Karen Dreiling, David Herl, Kim Hodny, Mike Holliday, Sandy Jacobs, Sandy Keller, Elodie Jones, Justin McClung, and Dustin Roths.
Retiring DHDC board members are Holly Haynes, Eddie Perrett, and Andrew Rupp.
The new DHDC board members are David Herl, Mike Holliday, and Sandy Keller.
The January Board of Directors meeting will immediately follow the conclusion of the annual meeting.
For more information contact Sara Bloom, DHDC Executive Director, at [email protected] or (785) 621-4171.
One of the first graders in Lori Williams’ classroom is clearly restless during the students’ morning community circle.
As the children discuss their weekly goals, how to be a good citizen and what integrity means, the young girl is distracted. She wriggles and shifts, pulls both arms through a shirt sleeve and eventually checks out, turning her back to the group and walking her hands up the chalkboard.
First-graders in Lori Williams’ class at Alexander Procter Elementary School take part in their morning community circle. TAMMY WORTH / HEARTLAND HEALTH MONITOR
Williams gently but purposefully touches the young girl’s foot, asking, “Are you OK?” Startled, the diminutive brunette mumbles, “Yes” and turns around, her attention refocused on her classmates.
In some schools, the inattention and fidgeting would be considered grounds for reproach or punishment. Not so with Williams, who’s trained in the practices of trauma-informed, or trauma-sensitive, schools.
A growing movement here in the Kansas City area and across the United States, trauma-informed care has taken root at local mental health and social service providers, hospitals and schools. Gradually but steadily, it’s spreading through school districts and early childhood centers looking to catch and stem childhood behavioral problems in the hope of avoiding hospitalizations and incarceration in adulthood. Although there isn’t much hard data yet showing whether the programs are effective in changing behavior, early results from preschool to high schools are encouraging.
The movement is based on the idea that much of student misbehavior may be the result of a brain that has been overwhelmed by repeated traumatic experiences.
Instead of providing reactive services for students in crisis, teachers in trauma-sensitive schools attempt to diagnose underlying problems and keep children emotionally present, opening their brain up for learning.
“We need to give some extra TLC to these students,” says Amy Hawley, principal of Alexander Procter Elementary School in Independence, Missouri, where Williams teaches. “Maybe provide extra triage and figure out what we can do to help support them inside these walls where we have some control.”
Toxic stress
When someone experiences stress, the body responds by releasing hormones that provide energy for “fight or flight.” When that occurs regularly, it takes longer for the hormones to diminish, affecting children’s brain development.
Trauma can occur at any income level, but tends to be more prevalent among lower-income, urban populations, according to Molly Ticknor, a trauma-sensitive trainer with Truman Medical Centers’ Resilience Incubator. The incubator provides training to area social service agencies, schools and other groups. Ticknor was one of the first to introduce the idea to elementary and secondary education locally when she began working with the Kansas City Public Schools three years ago.
More than 95 percent of students at pilot schools in Truman’s program qualify for free and reduced lunch, meaning they live below the poverty line. Ticknor has worked with districts including Independence, Kansas City, Center, Leavenworth, North Kansas City and Blue Valley. She says connecting the dots between poverty, toxic stress, violence and neglect often leads to a diagnosis of trauma.
The Independence School District took on the issue because administrators knew a large number of students had experienced significant trauma, says John Tramel, director of Family Services & Caring Communities with the district. That’s in part because of the socioeconomic status of its population: A majority of students are low-income and more than 5 percent are homeless.
“We know we have children in every socioeconomic range that suffer from trauma and they walk in not ready to work on reading or math or whatever else we are trying to teach,” says Beth Savidge, an assistant superintendent in the district. “We have to take care of the emotional side as well as the academic side of teaching to create an environment where children are able to learn.”
Paper tigers
When hardwired to remain in a heightened state of awareness, children who experience toxic stress are in constant overdrive. In elementary schools, this can take the form of outbursts, name-calling or putting one’s head down on the desk and refusing to work.
Ticknor says she has seen some early changes in this kind of behavior at schools undergoing her training. Two pilot elementary schools in Kansas City, for instance, had fewer behavioral problems after implementing trauma-sensitive principles. Through October of the 2013-2014 school year, Garfield and Rogers Elementary had 186 disciplinary referrals. At the same point in the 2014-2015, the schools had 139.
Lori Williams interacts with one of her first-grade students at Alexander Procter Elementary School. CREDIT TAMMY WORTH / HEARTLAND HEALTH MONITOR
Catching children early is important because these behaviors only intensify as they age. In middle and high school, they begin to look to drugs, alcohol and other risky behaviors to cope.
At Lincoln High School in Walla Walla, Washington, much of the student population had experienced some sort of childhood trauma, including parental abandonment, sexual abuse and mental illness among family members. The school was a roiling cauldron until 2010, when its principal, Jim Sporleder, went to an educational conference where he learned about trauma-sensitive schools.
Sporleder had grown tired of the traditional way these schools were run, with students acting out, getting suspended and returning to school ready for another fight. This cycle, he says, is “the easy way out.”
“If you can seek the cause … you can the change behavior,” he says in the documentary “Paper Tigers,” which examines the school’s trauma-sensitive journey.
Sporleder began implementing the trauma-sensitive principles and within three years, the number of fights at Lincoln went down by 75 percent and the graduation rate increased five-fold.
After seeing such success with the program, the community decided it would be beneficial to begin this work at a younger age and enlisted the help of Kansas City’s Crittenton Children’s Center to train the community at the early childhood level. Crittenton created Head Start Trauma Smart, a nationally-renowned model used since 2010 in early childhood centers.
Crittenton’s program touches 26 counties across Missouri covering 3,300 children statewide.
Crittenton was also called upon to work in secondary schools locally in 2014, training staff at Summit Ridge Academy, an alternative high school in Lee’s Summit, Missouri. The staff has seen positive results. In the 2014-2015 school year, the attendance rate increased by more than 83 percent among 75 percent of its students; the passing rate onto the next grade level increased by 10 percent; and confrontations fell by 50 percent compared with the previous year.
Janine Hron, CEO of Crittenton, said prior to implementing Trauma Smart in the Head Start program, up to 12 percent of Head Start children were being referred to Crittenton for therapy for behavioral disorders. After the program, that number went down by 50 percent. That equates into educational savings. As children move into elementary school, those with behavioral challenges are placed on what’s known as an individualized education program and receive special education services. Hron says the average cost to teach a child on an IEP is about $32,000 annually – as opposed to about $12,000 for other students.
“If there are two to three kids per class on an IEP and at least one is there because of behavioral reasons … then if 50 percent of those can be accommodated by improving their environment, that’s a lot of money,” Hron says.
In spite of these potential savings, Ticknor says there’s always some pushback against the initiative among districts, schools and staff. About 20 percent of people in the groups she works with don’t buy into the concept because of other issues like curriculum priorities, state standards, teachers’ contracts and testing prep.
Funding is also a challenge for cash-strapped districts. Truman’s program begins at $125 per hour for consulting and coaching and $40 per staff member for initial training. Ticknor said much of her work with schools has been funded through federal grants and other external funding. The Head Start program initially cost about $400 per student a year. Hron said it averages less than that now since they streamlined the training.
Safe zones
Ticknor trains schools on a framework rooted in concepts developed by Massachusetts Advocates for Children, a Boston-based nonprofit, which observed more than a decade ago that students who were frequently expelled or spent a lot of time in detention had often experienced some kind of trauma.
The group generated a series of papers highlighting the impact of domestic violence on children’s brains and adopted general principles of trauma-sensitive educational environments.
Ticknor built on this to create a general framework that instills creative problem solving, mindfulness, self-regulation and trust building. The concepts are supposed to be part of every aspect of the students’ experiences at school.
Hawley has incorporated them wholeheartedly at Procter, with much of the work focusing on goal setting, communication and rituals to make students feel safe.
Instead of saying “good morning,” greeters inquire, “How are you feeling today?” when students arrive.
Amy Hawley, Procter’s principal, with Milli, the school’s certified professional therapy dog. CREDIT TAMMY WORTH / HEARTLAND HEALTH MONITOR
Children are taught to fill each other’s emotional buckets instead of being “dippers.” The staff is encouraged to take “thankful walks” during breaks. To keep students in the room when they are acting out, teachers divert their attention with
tactile objects like Play-Doh and exercise bands to refocus their energy.
If children do need to leave, they are sent to a recovery room where they work on managing their emotions.
When researching ways to help students manage emotions, Hawley came across the idea of professional therapy dogs and adopted a gentle Labrador retriever, Millie. The dog, who spends her days resting in the school’s office, is trained to sense when children are anxious and offer a soft paw of support. If they need extra care, she can spend 15 to 20 minutes acting as a comforting “blanket.”
Since the implementation of trauma-informed teaching, behavior at Procter has changed dramatically. In the 2013-2014 school year, there were 542 referrals to the principal’s office. Last year there were 323 and this year there were only 98 through November.
Back in Williams’ room, the students in the circle discuss how to be respectful, responsible and safe, a mantra repeated in the classroom, on posters throughout the building and in morning announcements.
They show how they feel by giving a thumb’s up, sideways or down. They brainstorm ways to make unhappy students feel better, like smiling or playing with them. One young student reaches over and ties a friend’s shoes. Another – a self-proclaimed animal expert – offers to share his knowledge with anyone interested. The students are sleepy but relaxed and forthcoming with their ideas, goals and emotional state.
“We are teaching kids how to be aware and mindful of their bodies and understand what to do when they are scared or anxious,” Ticknor says. “Because if they don’t know what is happening, how can they be expected to regulate themselves?”
Tammy Worth is a freelance journalist based in Blue Springs, Missouri.