By Miranda Davis

KU Statehouse Wire Service

 

TOPEKA – The Senate Education Committee on Thursday debated a bill that would change the high school size classification system for sporting events.

Senate Bill 464 would strike the portion of current law that requires the Kansas State High School Activities Association (KSHSAA) to classify schools based on student attendance.

Jeff Hines, athletic director at Paola High School and proponent of the bill, said the change would allow KSHSAA to create a more flexible system. Hines said that the current system is too rigid and doesn’t allow for a competitive athletic postseason for many schools. The bill does not offer a replacement to the current system.

“A large school with a high percentage of low socioeconomic status students cannot move down a division to face more appropriate competition,” Hines said. “Likewise, a school that excels cannot be forced to move up into a higher division, nor can they appeal to move up a classification.”

The bill was introduced Wednesday and referred to the Education Committee.

KSHSAA, the nonprofit organization that administers interscholastic programs for school members, including sporting and nonsporting activities, such as debate, remained neutral toward the legislation. The association has organized its own committee to study the classification system in use.

Sen. Vicki Schmidt, R-Topeka, expressed concerns about the lack of KSHSAA support for the bill.

“KSHSAA has certainly come before this body, and certainly this committee, multiple times and asked for tweaks and changes,” Schmidt said. “Certainly they’re not foreign to this process. So why didn’t they go the next step and say: ‘This is an impediment, we would like to consider some other things and here’s maybe a few things we should ask for?’”

Hines said he believed that it would be redundant for KSHSAA to endorse a plan at this stage because if approved by the legislature, member schools would still have to vote. Hines said SB 464 would allow KSHSAA to come up with a system and let member schools approve it, instead of the legislature.

“Simply put, I’m asking for less oversight from the legislature,” Hines said.

Sen. Molly Baumgardner, R-Louisburg, asked Hines if he would be willing to relinquish state funding if the legislature agreed to relinquish oversight of how the KSHSAA classifies school.

“If we relinquished the funding behind it, (high school activities) would disappear,” Hines said.

 

Edited by Leah Sitz

 

 

By MEGAN HART

The practice of delivering babies a few days early for the convenience of mothers and doctors has been a common one for years at hospitals across the country and in Kansas.

But when research established that deliveries done even a little ahead of schedule can threaten the health of newborns, Kansas health care providers decided it was time to end the practice.

A quality improvement initiative launched in mid-2012 hasn’t accomplished that goal but it has reduced the rate of “early elective births” at participating Kansas hospitals by 70 percent, according to officials at the Kansas Healthcare Collaborative, which spearheaded the effort with the Kansas Hospital Association and March of Dimes.

“We want to change the culture in this state toward one of constant improvement, and one of safety, more importantly,” says Kendra Tinsley, executive director of the Kansas Healthcare Collaborative, a nonprofit formed in 2008 by the hospital association and the Kansas Medical Society.

The goal of the initiative is to reduce early elective births at 52 Kansas hospitals participating in a quality improvement to less than 2 percent of all deliveries. The partnership focused on convincing hospital administrators to adopt “hard stop” policies, which essentially prohibit doctors from delivering babies before the 39th week of pregnancy unless deemed medically necessary.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists revised its recommendations in 2013 to define full term as a birth occurring at the 39th week or later. Until then, OB-GYNs viewed outcomes as roughly the same for babies born at the 37th week of pregnancy or later, and some performed cesarean sections or induced labor in the last weeks of pregnancy when mothers requested, even if there was no medical risk in continuing the pregnancy.

However, research showed that babies had the best outcomes when they were born during at least the 39th week of pregnancy, mostly because their lungs and brains weren’t fully developed before then.

But Tinsley says front-line practitioners may not always be aware of developments in research and changes in recommendations. Even if they are, a patient’s desire for the convenience of a scheduled birth can push the physician to perform one, or the patient may change doctors to find someone who will accommodate her preference, she says.

Some early births can’t be avoided because labor begins spontaneously or because the mother or baby has a medical problem that makes continuing the pregnancy a greater risk than delivering the baby early. The goal is to target early births that don’t fall into either of those categories, Tinsley says.

‘Goal of perfection’

Early indications show the changes are having an effect. As of December 2014, the number of early elective deliveries had fallen 70.5 percent at participating hospitals since June 2012, Tinsley says.

However, when deliveries at all 67 of the Kansas hospitals that provide obstetric services are included, the overall rate of early elective births still totaled 4.4 percent in 2014.

That, Tinsley says, means the collaborative still has work to do educating doctors and hospital administrators.

“We always strive for zero,” Tinsley says. “We always have the goal of perfection.”

Keeping the message at the forefront of providers’ minds is particularly important because quality improvement sometimes stalls or even slides back when a hospital’s leaders who pushed for change go to work somewhere else or move on to other priorities, she says.

The Kansas Healthcare Collaborative doesn’t have data on home-based births or those at birthing centers.

Insurer offers incentive

BlueCross and BlueShield of Kansas joined the effort in 2013. The insurer offers incentives for hospitals where the early elective delivery rate doesn’t exceed 3 percent, spokeswoman Mary Beth Chambers says. That includes elective cesarean sections and induced vaginal births before the 39th week, if they aren’t medically necessary, she says.

Hospitals participating in the Blue Cross and Blue Shield quality program continued to reduce their early elective birth rates in 2015, Chambers says. The rate for participating Kansas hospitals fell from 2.7 percent of births in 2014 to 1.1 percent in 2015, she says.

The idea is that doctors will respond to financial incentives, benefiting the families under their care and the system as a whole, Chambers says. She declined to say how much Blue Cross and Blue Shield offered Kansas hospitals that met the 3 percent threshold.

“From a medical perspective, we know that babies born full-term have the greatest opportunity to reach their full potential in life; from an insurance perspective, we know that babies born early for the convenience of the physician or mother can end up in the neonatal intensive care unit for a period of time, which unnecessarily adds to the cost of health care claims,” she said in an email.

Megan Hart is a reporter for KHI News Service in Topeka, a partner in the Heartland Health Monitor team. You can reach her on Twitter @meganhartMC