Judge will not require second voting location for Dodge City

TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Opening a new polling site in the historic Wild West town of Dodge City, Kansas, just days before the election is not in the public’s interest because it would likely create more voter confusion, a federal judge ruled Thursday.

The Dodge City Civic Center was the previous polling location. The Expo Center is the only location for voters on Tuesday -google map

U.S. District Judge Daniel Crabtree denied the motion by the American Civil Liberties Union of Kansas seeking a temporary court order forcing Ford County Clerk Deborah Cox to reopen a voting location at the old Civic Center location after she moved the city’s only polling site to a facility outside city limits and more than a mile from the nearest bus stop.

The judge noted that since Sept. 28, Cox notified voters of the change by letter and through the media — advertising in newspapers, on the radio and on the county’s website.

“For the court to insert itself into this process on the eve of the election — by ordering the reopening of the Civic Center either as the only polling location or a second polling location — likely would create more voter confusion than it might cure,” Crabtree wrote.

The only polling site for the city’s now 13,000 registered voters for two decades was the Civic Center in a mostly white part of town. Cox decided to move the site to a new county Expo Center after learning that a construction project was planned for late October at the Civic Center — though work had not started as of Thursday.

The ACLU asked Crabtree to order Cox to open both the old and new polling sites for Tuesday for Election Day. The ACLU argues that moving the only polling site makes it more difficult for the city’s mostly Hispanic population to vote.

Micah Kubic, executive director of the ACLU of Kansas, said in an emailed statement that while they are disappointed by the ruling, they are also encouraged by much of it and hopeful about their prospects as the case moves forward.

“Had voters learned of her decision sooner, our case may have prevailed,” Kubic said. “She can rest easy — for now —that she was able to run out the clock. We’re all left to wonder, however, what might have been accomplished had she merely chosen to work with us and with our clients.”

Cox’s attorney, Bradley Schlozman, said they are pleased with the result and his client “will now once again turn her efforts to administering what will hopefully be a smooth election next Tuesday for all voters.”

Crabtree said the court has not decided whether the plaintiffs will ultimately succeed on their constitutional claims, and said that the court has concluded that they have not shown that they are likely to prevail on their lawsuit.

The hearing ended with Crabtree questioning Cox and her attorneys about arrangements for voters who show up at the old polling site. They said the city has offered to take voters from their homes and jobs to the new polling place, and Cox said she reached out to the city again Thursday morning about moving voters between the old and new polling sites.

“They do have a limited number of buses, however,” she said.

Cox’s conflict with the ACLU over the single polling site stretches back to at least May, when Johnny Dunlap, the Ford County Democratic Party chairman and a volunteer for an ACLU voting rights project, asked her to open a second polling site for Dodge City, according to testimony. Both he and Cox testified that Dunlap and her office had further run-ins during the August primary, and in October, the ACLU asked Cox to publicize a hotline for its voting rights project on her office’s website.

She forwarded that request to the Kansas secretary of state’s office in an Oct. 22 email saying, “LOL.”

“What I really meant is, ‘Here we go again. Where is it going to stop?'” Cox testified.

Crabtree wrote in his ruling he was troubled by Cox’s reaction to the letter and questioned “whether it manifests a disregard for the ‘fundamental significance’ that our Constitution places on the right to vote.”

The southwest Kansas city, located 160 miles (257 kilometers) west of Wichita, once was a destination for cattle drives where cowboys and gunslingers tangled. In recent decades, meatpacking plants have drawn to the town thousands of Hispanics, who now make up a majority of the 27,000 population.

The ACLU sued on behalf of the League of United Latin American Citizens and Alejandro Rangel-Lopez, the 18-year-old son of Mexican immigrants who will be voting for the first time in next week’s election.

Rangel-Lopez testified by phone that his father, who became a U.S. citizen in 2004, has had to wait an hour and sometimes two hours to vote at the single polling place.

As for the new polling site, he said, “It’s just in the middle of nowhere.”

___

A federal judge says it is not in the public interest to order a western Kansas county to open another polling site in Dodge City just days before the election.

U.S. District Judge Daniel Crabtree said in a written ruling Thursday evening that the request from the American Civil Liberties Union for an order to open a second polling would likely cause more voter confusion than it might cure.

He notes the city has offered for the past 20 years only one polling location for its 13,000 registered voters. But he says that while another location might mitigate concerns about long lines during certain times, the plaintiffs have had 20 years to present that claim.

Crabtree wrote he was troubled by Ford County Clerk Deborah Cox’s reaction to an ACLU that she forwarded to the Secretary of State’s office with the comment “LOL.”

___

TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — The Kansas county clerk who moved the only polling site for the historic Wild West town of Dodge City sought to reassure a federal judge that voters can take buses to get there and that people who show up in the wrong place will get help.

But Ford County Clerk Deborah Cox acknowledged during a federal court hearing Thursday that she’s still uncertain about arrangements for moving people to the new facility outside the city limits if they show up at the old site in town instead.

The only polling site for the city’s now 13,000 registered voters for two decades was a civic center in a mostly white part of town. Cox decided to move the site to a new county Expo Center after learning that a construction project was planned for late October at the civic center — though work had not started as of Thursday.

The American Civil Liberties Union asked U.S. District Judge Daniel Crabtree to order Cox to open both the old and new polling sites for Tuesday for Election Day. The ACLU argues that moving the only polling site makes it more difficult for the city’s mostly Hispanic population to vote.

“They do have a limited number of buses, however,” she said.

Crabtree did not issue a ruling from the bench but said he would have a decision soon because, “I know what day Election Day is.”

Cox is a Republican who has served as the elected county clerk since 2016. She sent a notice to voters on Sept. 28 that she was moving the location for the upcoming election outside the city limits to the new Expo Center, which she acknowledged in the mailing was inconvenient. It is more than a mile from the nearest bus stop.

The ACLU sued on behalf of the League of United Latin American Citizens and Alejandro Rangel-Lopez, the 18-year-old son of Mexican immigrants who will be voting for the first time in November.

Rangel-Lopez testified by phone that his father, who became a U.S. citizen in 2004, has had to wait an hour and sometimes two hours to vote at the single polling place.

As for the new polling site, he said, “It’s just in the middle of nowhere.”

Johnny Dunlap, the Ford County Democratic Party chairman, said that in his opinion, the city’s bus system “does not have the capacity” to move potentially several thousand voters.

Cox testified that she wasn’t notified formally of plans for a late-October start for a construction project at the civic center until the end of August. She said state law required her to notify voters by early October.

She said she needed a site as large as the civic center, and the only other potential venue was an arena near a casino, even further outside town.

Cox and Bryan Caskey, the state elections director in the Kansas secretary of state’s office, questioned whether Ford County would have enough time to find and program equipment, find and train election workers and make other arrangements for a second polling site. Caskey noted Kansas law requires election officials to assign each voter to only one polling place on Election Day, a further complication.

“I don’t like to use the word impossible because I don’t work in impossibilities. It would be extraordinarily difficult,” Caskey told reporters after the hearing. “It would be even more so without violating several state laws.”

___