We have a brand new updated website! Click here to check it out!

HAWVER: Kansas lawmakers on the hunt for election-season wins

martin hawver line art

Wonder what’s coming at us from the next Kansas Legislature, when members of the House and Senate are going to be trying to think up things that will make us remember them fondly when it comes time to vote the following fall?

Well, the just-approved list of interim study committees which will meet this summer and fall may give us—and them—an idea of the support and the opposition to ideas that they’ll consider.

Interim committees, generally seven- to 11-member panels of representatives and senators, have dozens of topics to take a look at, and those committees make recommendations to the full Legislature for next session. There won’t be as many of those interim committees this year, to save money, but some of the issues that they’ll take a look at are intriguing. Oh, and some aren’t.

The concept: Those small panels look at ideas to see whether they should become bills for the upcoming session and to learn enough about the topics to make reasonable suggestions for those bills.

Wonder what they’ll look at? Here are some topics that have been assigned:

• Whether law enforcement officers should wear body cameras so we can learn how interactions between officers and the public go. Lots of national interest in cop-citizen interactions; we’ve all seen the photos on TV. The concept is relatively simple: If you believe you’ve been harassed or dealt with badly, well, there’s the film. And, if the complaint is unreasonable, well, there’s the film to show that the officer acted reasonably. Best result: Everyone is a little more polite because it’s on camera. The side issue: Will the state pay for those cameras?

• Another issue that may go lots of ways in those hearings is considering whether there are ways to supervise potentially dangerous people with drug or mental health problems short of putting them in jail. It’s a combination of both helping those people in the least restrictive setting possible and making sure that they aren’t a danger to society or themselves. There are budget implications here.

• Related…somewhat, though for a different set of Kansans, is looking at whether everyone who is now in prison for crimes really needs to be there, or whether there are ways to monitor their behavior and actions in a less restrictive, less costly manner. Ankle bracelets so we know where they are? Figuring out whether something less than iron bars will punish them and make sure they don’t hurt others? That one has a lot of ways to go. And, look for opposition to cutting imprisonment, especially from crime victims.

• On the general public safety side—and legislators like making us feel safer—there are several issues bubbling in the pot for interim study. They range from making sure that the state’s—and nation’s—power grids are safe and dependable to whether there are security problems in ensuring that power grid. School security becomes an issue, too, and what the state is doing to make sure that students are safe there.

• Other topics: Are there some loose ends to be buttoned down on the change of local government elections from the spring to the fall of odd-numbered years? So many ways that could go wrong, or that something has been forgotten. Better get all the details nailed down in the upcoming session rather than when voters are standing in line in November 2017 to vote on the city council and school board.

• And, there’s also a move among conservative legislators to make local units of government report publicly in budget documents the money spent on hiring lobbyists to represent them before the Legislature. The deal here: Legislators want their constituents to believe that they know those local issues and will take care of them…but experience shows that it never hurts to have a lobbyist watching out for an issue, and those lobbyists are generally cheaper than sending the police chief or the surveyor or the mayor to hang around the Statehouse to make sure that some bill doesn’t unintentionally wreck or make more expensive local programs. And. that can happen.

Might be an interesting fall; at least we’ll get an idea of what to look—and look out—for…

Syndicated by Hawver News Co. of Topeka, Martin Hawver is publisher of Hawver’s Capitol Report. To learn more about this nonpartisan statewide political news service, visit www.hawvernews.com.

MOVIE REVIEW: ‘Trainwreck’ is anything but

James Gerstner reviews movies for Hays Post.
James Gerstner reviews movies for Hays Post.

Movies, TV shows and novels like to dance with the line, “It’s what people do.” I’ve always liked it. It’s powerful and consistently interesting to see how the setup line changes the result. Perhaps my favorite is the adaptation from the tremendous BBC series “Sherlock” – where the title character says, “He could have died” and Moriarty yells back, “That’s what people DO!”

What people do. What do people do? That wonderfully confusing idea is at heart of the new Amy Schumer comedy, “Trainwreck.” Like a lot of comedies that have a major romantic element, the main characters come from very different worlds. Instead of one being named Capulet and the other Montague: the leads in “Trainwreck” meet in the middle from opposite ends of the “It’s what people do” spectrum. Which is a life better lived? A life in service to others? A life in service to oneself? In my experience, these concepts are moving targets.

“Trainwreck” isn’t, in and of itself, a major philosophical investigation. It’s a very strong, well-written comedy that fields innately interesting characters and let’s the relative distance between them determine the strength of their bond (I’m proud of that line, it has science, it has poetry and it even has relation to “Ant-Man”). Amy Schumer absolutely shines. For mainstream audiences, Schumer is a relatively new name. Here are the highlights you need to know: she’s brilliant, she’s hysterical, she’s not afraid to offend people and she doesn’t take prisoners.

Trainwreck_poster

The other members of the cast are all strong in their own right and fit very well into Schumer’s comedy snow globe. LeBron James, as in the basketball player LeBron James, is an absolute delight. I, better than most, understand how odd that sentence sounds, but LeBron is genuinely very funny. His comedic timing is impeccable. Before seeing the movie I, like many people, groaned at the idea of another athlete cameo. By the end of the film, I found myself looking forward to LeBron scenes. I am truly very impressed and would welcome more LeBron James in movies.

I think “Trainwreck” is my favorite comedy of the year, it’s definitely my favorite comedy of the summer. For a movie called “Trainwreck,” it certainly brings out the best from all parties involved, sometimes tremendously, sometimes surprisingly, but always effectively.

5 of 6 stars

MOVIE REVIEW: ’Ant-Man’ offers full-sized thrills

James Gerstner reviews movies for Hays Post.
James Gerstner reviews movies for Hays Post.

Marvel’s indisputable talent is its consistent ability to make ideas that have no right to work, work. “Guardians of the Galaxy” should not have worked. It was ludicrous, but it satisfied fanboys and, more importantly, it set a great many hearts to racing. Everyone knows Batman and Spider-Man are big, popular comics that translate to big, popular movies. Amusingly, prior to the 2008 theatrical release of the first “Iron Man” movie, the Iron Man character was second string, at best. Marvel Studios uncompromising vision turned Iron Man, an untested character, into a hero to rival Batman and Superman, no small feat.

In a very similar fashion, a superhero movie about “Ant-Man” shouldn’t work. It just sounds stupid. A hero who can shrink to the size of an insect and control ants? I love this stuff and that even sounds lame to me. Well folks, Marvel has done it again. “Ant-Man” shouldn’t work, but it does. Resoundingly.

Every pun intended, “Ant-Man” is much smaller than other Marvel movies. It’s more intimate, in some respects, it starts at its own beginning and finds its burgeoning position within the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Perhaps “Ant-Man’s” greatest triumph is its novel twist on the superhero movie.

_1432865109

Perspective is a rare and valuable commodity and it’s a wonderful byproduct of a character that can change his size. This isn’t Cap fighting the good fight, this isn’t Iron Man being brilliant or Thor being heroic. This is a sorry about a father, an ex-convict desperately trying to turn his life around. What makes the story heroic, what makes it a story worth telling is the unique solution to age old problems. This is a heist movie with a climax that takes place on a little girl’s toy train set.

Paul Rudd, who plays protagonist Scott Lang/Ant-Man is primarily known as a comedian, which might not seem like a natural fit; however, I’m pleased to report that it’s an inspired casting choice. He does action well, he does fear well and, of course, he does comedy well. I am very excited to see Rudd’s involvement in upcoming team-based Marvel movies such as “Captain America: Civil War” and “Avengers 3.”

“Ant-Man” really resonates, partially because of Marvel’s secret sauce and partially because it’s so different than “typical” superhero movies. I can say, with certainty, that “Ant-Man” is worth your time and is definitely on my list to see again.

5 of 6 stars

Kansas teacher shortage grows

John Richard Schrock is a professor at Emporia State University.
John Richard Schrock is a professor at Emporia State University.

The number of Kansas teachers moving to another state doubled the 2010 figures. Kansas teacher retirements are up as well. Last week, the Kansas State Board of Education received the 2014-2015 Licensed Personnel Report. There was little in their data to ease the worries of some Kansas schools districts that are now seeing unfilled vacancies even in elementary education.

Three-fourths of the licensed school personnel are now women. Non-white teachers are under-represented compared to their proportion of the Kansas population, with only 1.5 percent Black or African-American and one-half percent Asian.

In 2010-2011, 331 teachers left Kansas to take a job in another state; last year, 654 left.

The economic downturn of 2008 did impact schools when funding was drastically cut. By 2010, there were 350 teachers lost by “reduction in force”; last year 80 more teachers left from continued reductions. The number of teachers who simply “left the profession” without retiring increased from 416 in 2010-2011 to 740 in 2014-2015.
Both the age of teachers and their number of years teaching are worrisome. Since there is reliable attrition year-by-year, the number of younger teachers is simply inadequate to fill the upcoming retirements unless a higher rate of teachers remain in teaching and remain in Kansas.

Attempts to solve the science shortage are not providing significant numbers. The 2014-2015 year was the first year that individuals could enter science-technology-engineering-mathematics (STEM) teaching from an adjacent profession without going through teacher training; only three teachers were added statewide under this STEM initiative.

This last year, only a little over 85 percent of science teachers are now fully licensed in secondary sciences, a figure that has been dropping for the last decade. However, few waivers were sought by districts for these out-of-field teachers. Waivers indicate that the teacher is making progress toward full licensure and only one biology, two chemistry and one physics teachers were granted waivers. The recent high increases in college tuition is a factor in securing qualified teachers.

I am awaiting a further breakout of the secondary science area for 2014-201`5. However, based on the prior year data from the KSDE, the number of initial teacher licenses showed the lowest numbers of new teachers entering the Kansas classroom in biology, chemistry, physics and earth science since records have been kept. Not all individuals who acquire teacher training enter the Kansas classroom, so some excess production is needed to replace the cohort of retiring teachers.

In biology, over 200 new teachers are needed per year. Only 17 completed Kansas programs (initial, restricted, and temporary non-renewable) and an additional 10 completed out-of-state programs (initial, exchange, professional, provisional/alternative route, and temporary non-renewable). 15 teachers added biology by test-out.

Kansas needs 120 initial chemistry teachers. Only five came from Kansas programs, two from out-of-state, one was Kansas provisional, and 14 added chemistry by test-out.

Kansas needs over 100 physics teachers. Four completed Kansas programs, one completed an out-of-state program, and 10 gained licensure by test-out.

In earth and space science, one completed a Kansas program, four completed out-of-state programs and 32 tested-out.

Since most test-out teachers have not taken college science lab courses, they lack that experience that makes the science meaningful and also provides lab experiences that they can simplify for use with their students.

Simply, more current teachers are adding science endorsements than there are new science teachers produced. This supply of current Kansas teachers who can cross-over and test-out is limited and will soon be exhausted.

Many teachers testified at the last KSBE open forum, pointing out various ways in which the teaching profession is being derided, disrespected, and blamed. As several State Board members noted, our teacher shortage is going to get worse before it gets better.

EXPLORING KAN. OUTDOORS: Awesomely possumly

Steve Gilliland
Steve Gilliland

Popular descriptive words and phrases come and go with generations. When I was a kid they were fairly mundane, like neat, cool or far-out.

Evidently ,one of the recently concocted phrases of today is “awesome possum!” The other day at work, I unlocked a door to let a girl get something she needed but was having trouble finding, and she declared my efforts “awesome possum” at least four times during the couple minutes it took.

I’m always looking and listening for experiences or utterances that might make for a good column, and what outdoor writer worth his or her deer jerky could resist doing something with the phrase “awesome possum.”

There is probably no other critter that garners as much disdain as the lowly Virginia Opossum. They have their place in nature like every other member of God’s creation, but much like the turkey vulture, it’s often tough to see.

One of the nicknames given the late country singer George Jones was “the possum,” and he did kinda’ look like one. Trappers hate to find possums in their traps; rather than killing them, my brother and I used to grab the possums by their tale and fling them as far as we could, or simply hold them at arm’s length and punt them over the nearest fence. I guess we figured that, like a boy named Sue, if they had survived to that point, they deserved to live another day. Surprisingly, possum fur is very soft. Much of our possum fur goes to felt plants, where it is shaved, dyed and pressed together to make felt. The green felt covering many pool tables is made from possum fur.

The Virginia Opossum is North America’s only marsupial, meaning that like kangaroos, they raise and carry their young in a “marsupian” or pouch. Baby possums exit their mothers pouch at two to three months old, then ride around on her back for another couple months. Possums are generally placid and usually just hiss and show you a mouth full of pointed little teeth. They are not good at defending themselves, and if threatened can fall into a sort of involuntary shock-like state, known as “playing possum.” Just for the record, thinking back on all the encounters I’ve had with possums, I have never witnessed this.

Possums are omnivorous, meaning they will eat almost anything from insects, rodents and fruit, to carrion, and seem especially fond of dog food left in Rovers bowl overnight. They can adapt to living nearly anywhere they find food, water and shelter, and are perfectly at home in trees. Their bare, boney prehensile tail helps them climb, but they cannot hang from their tail as some traditional stories and drawings suggest.

Going through life as a possum would be a truly humbling experience, maybe an experience we should all have to endure sometime for an hour or so just to put things in perspective…(alright, that made a whole lot more sense when it was just a thought rattling around in my head.) Anyway love em’ or hate em’, possums are survivors, so here’s hoping you have an “awesome possum” day, and Continue to Explore Kansas Outdoors.

Steve Gilliland, Inman, can be contacted by email at [email protected].

INSIGHT KANSAS: The pay-fors come due

Last January, Sam Brownback was trying hard to shift the blame for an expanding state budget crisis. Referring to the 2012 Kansas income tax cuts, he told the Topeka Chamber of Commerce, “What I got from the Legislature was a naked tax cut with none of the pay-fors.”

Duane Goossen

But in 2012, Brownback did not admit any misgivings. He happily signed the income tax cut bill, the most consequential act of his governorship and the beginning of the so-called Kansas experiment. Until the state budget crisis hit, he trumpeted his decision as a shot of adrenalin to the Kansas economy.

Now, three years in, Kansans and the nation are realizing how high the costs of our tax experiment have been. The income tax cuts were indeed not free. “Pay-fors” have definitely been required.

The most visible pay-fors have been tax increases. The 2012 income tax cuts blew such a hole in the state budget that lawmakers had no real choice during the 2015 legislative session but to raise taxes somewhere. They chose the sales tax, cigarette tax, and a few others. The state sales tax has increased to 6.5 percent, and only Mississippians pay a higher sales tax rate on food than Kansans. Unwilling to challenge a veto threat from the governor, legislators could not correct the income tax policy that unfairly gives huge tax cuts to some of the wealthiest, but still requires working Kansans to pay.

The income tax cuts have also been paid for by cutting back state services. The most prominent example is the switch of school aid to a block grant formula. The block grant lowered classroom funding and then froze that diminished funding in place for the next two years. The block grant was not implemented because it was a better, fairer way to distribute funds. Rather, the key purpose was to put a chokehold on school finance in order to make up for a portion of the revenue loss from the income tax cuts. In response, school districts have shortened their school year, chopped programs, and raised property taxes. And in ongoing school finance litigation, the Kansas district court has already ruled the block grant system inadequately funds schools, thus violating the state constitution.

One of the biggest costs of the Kansas experiment, although not as easily quantifiable, has been stagnation. With the state in financial crisis, all thoughts go toward surviving the chaos, pulling back, and making do. The Kansas political environment currently offers no capacity to consider questions like: How do we make our schools world-class? What are the next steps for our road system? Can we improve the health of our citizens? Progress requires a stable budget and fiscal situation which Kansas still does not have. While Kansas lawmakers were spending a record-long legislative session agonizing over finances, other states were thinking about their future and passing us by.

The pay-fors have come into focus: Higher sales and property taxes. Cut-back services. Crisis-management politics overtaking future planning.

What are the benefits? Did Kansas get anything for all these pay-fors?

The Brownback administration cites economic statistics that show the Kansas economy has been growing. That’s true. Kansas has been on a slow economic path upward, but below the national average. Other states that did not apply tax cuts have been growing faster. The tax cuts did not give the Kansas economy any kind of measurable positive jolt. Instead, Kansans have been on the receiving end of a lot of pay-fors.

The 2015 legislative session is over, but next year lawmakers have another chance to put Kansas on a better path, by ending an experiment that has already cost us dearly.

Duane Goossen is a Senior Fellow at the Kansas Center for Economic Growth and formerly served 12 years as Kansas Budget Director.

Survey: Majority say it’s OK to take down ‘that flag’

The Confederate battle flag has come down in South Carolina, off store shelves and is going, gone or never coming to auto license plates.

For a majority of Americans, that’s just fine, even if we differ over its meaning. And therein is the real change.

Gene Policinski is senior vice president of the First Amendment Center
Gene Policinski is senior vice president of the First Amendment Center

A Newseum Institute national survey released over the July 4th weekend shows that a majority of all Americans agree with taking the Confederate battle flag down from display on public buildings, state-issued license tags, and in stores. But a majority of white and Hispanic respondents, asked what they think when they see the contested flag, still don’t identify it as a symbol of racial bias, even as an overwhelming number of African Americans do.

The national survey was conducted June 26-28, 2015, by the Newseum Institute’s First Amendment Center, as part of its annual examination of American attitudes about our core freedoms and related issues.

The results of the special survey about the Confederate flag — with 1,050 adult respondents, done online and with a margin of error of 3 percent — found that when asked if “government should ban the display of the Confederate flag on any publicly funded structure or flagpole,” 52 percent of whites support taking down the flag, while 85 percent of African Americans and 69 percent of Hispanics support such a move.

Asked if “private companies like Wal-Mart and Amazon were right to say recently that they will stop selling merchandise on which the Confederate flag is displayed,” 57 percent of whites are in support of removing flag products, with 94 percent of African Americans and 68 percent of Hispanics in support.

But the three groups differed greatly when asked to select between three options when “you see the Confederate flag.” Just 18 percent of whites and 31 percent of Hispanics saw it as a symbol of “racial prejudice against African Americans or others,” compared to 72 percent for African Americans.

Finally, 56 percent of all Americans agree that “government should be able to deny issuing license plates to a group that wants to display a Confederate flag on the plates,” with 44 percent disagreeing.

The response on auto tags is a reversal of findings from the Institute’s annual, nationwide “State of the First Amendment” telephone sampling conducted in mid-May — before the mass killings in Charleston, S.C., by a white supremacist who openly displayed the battle flag. Then, just 35 percent overall agreed that government should have such authority.

What to think of these survey answers?

For me — I am white — the survey results help explain how this flag, a symbol that I associate more with the forces of bigotry and hate than ancestry and heritage, could survive to still be a state symbol in so many places 150 years after the end of the Civil War. Many people who look like me just didn’t see it “that way.”

What I take away from the survey findings is this: Many more people who look like me “get it,” now and perhaps, finally.

How else to explain what clearly is a massive shift in public opinion and government approval — from Southern lawmakers to national retailers — in favor of taking the flag down?

Just a short time ago, as history measures things, states like South Carolina were raising the flag as a symbol of resistance to federally mandated integration, or they were displaying on T-shirts and “Dukes of Hazzard” cars as a salute to a rebel culture that was part “Give ’em Hell” and, for some, sending a message to their Northern cousins: “Go to hell.”

For me, the results say that — at long last — the majority is willing to say to a sizeable minority: “OK, even if it isn’t how I see it, I understand that it offends you for reasons I can support — so let’s take it down.”

In a way, the move to lower the battle flag is the long-awaited companion to the now-widespread recognition that once openly spoken racial jokes, blackface performances, and racial slurs — which also didn’t apply to people who look like me — no longer find acceptance among a majority of all Americans.

“Take it down” does not mean “remove it from memory.” Rather, it would seem, the message is, “Take it down as a mantra of hatred, and allow it to remain as a marker in history.”

The flag fight has more rounds to go. Some Mississippi lawmakers say they push legislation that would remove the Confederate symbol from the state flag. And the flag flap already is being cited in another longstanding dispute — the use of the nickname “Redskins” by the NFL team in Washington, D.C.

A statement by the group “Change the Mascot,” supported by the Native American Oneida Nation, said, “We have seen incredible bipartisan progress in recent weeks surrounding the effort to end the promotion, marketing and profiting off of the Confederate flag. … Now, (team owner) Dan Snyder and the NFL must face the fact that the R-word is hurtful and wrong, and that it’s time to do the right thing and change the name.”

There’s no sign that the decades-old dispute over the “R-word” will come to as quick an end as has — at least in South Carolina — public support and official sanction for flying the battle flag.

But the social tsunami of recent weeks in favor of bringing down the flag, culminating in an emotional late-night legislative vote in the South Carolina House, all may signal one more possible change that could be made: To the lyric line in an old tune that begins “Look Away, Look Away, Look Away… .”

For me, the last words in that line now ought to go, “And Look Ahead, Dixie Land.”

Gene Policinski is chief operating officer of the Newseum Institute and senior vice president of the Institute’s First Amendment Center. He can be reached at [email protected].

For more information about the 2015 State of the First Amendment survey: newseuminstitute.org/SOFA15.

States must force changes to U.S. Constitution

Open Letter To The Kansas State Legislature:

This is a call for the Kansas State Legislature to lead a lawful and peaceful revolution in union with other State Legislatures nationwide. The future of this grand experiment in freedom and liberty, the United States of America, is in your hands. You are the last line of defense for the people of Kansas against the professional politicians, bureaucrats and activist judges of the federal establishment who continue to lead us further and further into the darkness of tyranny. Time is growing short.

Our visionary Founders foresaw times like these and gave us the tool in Article V of the Constitution for the States-to discipline a corrupt and oppressive federal government. It provides that upon application of two-thirds of the States, and without discretionary intervention by the federal government, a Convention of the States for the purpose of proposing amendments to the Constitution must be convened.

While the convention may propose, the States dispose. To become part of the Constitution, proposed amendments must be ratified by three-fourths of the States, the same super majority ratification safeguard as has been met by the twenty-seven amendments we already have and that prevents radical, rogue changes to the Constitution, however remote their possibility.

A leading Article V movement, the Convention of States Project, is working to help bring about an Article V amending convention limited to proposing amendments that “impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limit the terms of office for its officials.”

Within this scope, the convention might consider such subjects as balancing the budget; establishing a fairer tax system; establishing term limits for members of Congress and the Judiciary including judges of the Supreme Court; establishing a Superior Court of the States to hear appeals from the Supreme Court; limiting the regulatory powers of unelected bureaucrats; limiting de facto law making by executive order; compelling Congress to make no law that does not apply equally to all, and establishing meaningful oversight with real governmental accountability; as well as reinforcing the fundamental principles of State Sovereignty and enumerated powers as envisioned by the Founders.

As the Article V movement gains momentum, unfounded attacks by the Anti-Constitution Anti-Article V Faction have become shrill and demeaning. Their aggression takes many forms; fear mongering, conspiracy theories, smear tactics, false associations, ad hominem insults, ballot-box threats, and outright fabrication. Their style is to throw out a charge against Article V, or its advocates, without valid, well-founded proof, and demand they be proven wrong. In other words, prove the negative, an intellectually dishonest, and manipulative technique. Their sole objective is to sabotage any attempt by the States to exercise the Constitutional Right provided by Article V.

Who are these purveyors of divisiveness? The big government socialist-progressives of course, but they largely observe from the sidelines as far right groups, claiming to be defenders of the Constitution, do their work for them. Principal actors from the right are The Eagle Forum, The John Birch Society, and the National Gun Rights Association together with affiliates and fellow travelers including an anarchist from Olathe.

What solutions do they offer? Their solutions can be grouped into a fool’s choice between two basic types; (1) Don’t do anything, just make Washington comply with the Constitution we have, and (2) When Washington overreaches, just have States nullify federal laws they deem unconstitutional. It is axiomatic that Washington will never voluntarily give back meaningful power to the States. And nullification would sting like pin pricks until the federal behemoth rises in retaliation and retribution.

Today, Liberty hangs in the balance. not just for ourselves, but for our children, our grandchildren, and our posterity. President John F. Kennedy captured it well in a statement made over fifty years ago:

“Today we need a nation of minute men; citizens who….regard the preservation of freedom as a basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom. The cause of liberty, the cause of America, cannot succeed with any lesser effort.”

This is likely the last and only way to restore our Constitution and our Republic. It cannot be done without the support of Legislators like you and the citizens of Kansas. HCR5010 and SCR1603 are both still awaiting your action when you get back to Topeka. I expect each of you to join the 56 co-sponsors of this legislation to move quickly next year to add Kansas to the growing list of States calling for a Convention of States.

Thank you for all that you do and God Bless the United States of America.

David Schneider – Marion, KS
Kansas State Director
Convention of States Project
www.coventionofstates.com

Now That’s Rural: Lyle Billips, America’s Best Steaks

Ron Wilson is director of the Huck Boyd National Institute for Rural Development at Kansas State University.
Ron Wilson is director of the Huck Boyd National Institute for Rural Development at Kansas State University.

By beef eaters for beef eaters. That sounds like my kind of project, and it is a fitting description for a growing company that is producing and marketing top quality beefsteaks.

Lyle Billips and Jeff Hardiek are co-founders of a company known as America’s Best Steaks. Lyle, or Butch as he is known, is a farmer, rancher and stockman in northwest Kansas. His family farms east of Hill City, where they raise corn, beans, wheat and milo and have a cow-calf herd and a commercial Angus feedlot.

As quality-conscious beef producers, Butch and his partners were frustrated when consumers said they can’t find good beef anyplace.

In 2003, Butch and Jeff were talking about this very problem. “We got tired of people saying that beef wasn’t good anymore,” Butch said. “I said, `No, it’s not that. It’s just that the beef isn’t handled right.’”

Butch and Lyle set out to identify a process that produced high-quality, good-tasting beef like the kind they had known growing up. “This became a challenge which morphed into a hobby which morphed into a business,” Jeff said.

Butch bought a cooler, put it in his garage and started experimenting with the process of processing and taste testing beef. Once they got the process perfected to their satisfaction, they launched a business to market their high quality beef products. The name of the business reflected their goal: America’s Best Steaks.

The key to the process is six weeks of dry aging. Temperature, humidity, air circulation, and moisture levels must be just right. As the company website says, “Dry aging may not be the easiest way to age beef, but it is the best.”

The goal is to produce the most naturally tender, juicy, and flavorful beefsteak possible on a consistent basis and at a reasonable price. It begins with the proper mix of genetics, nutrition, health and overall management of the beef animals, followed by the proper care and handling of the harvested beef product. As the company’s website states, their process “tenderizes the beef, minimizes the shrink at cooking and intensifies the flavor to a buttery-nutty taste, adding definite value to an unforgettable dining experience.”

The company established a website and started marketing the product. Word of mouth became their best advertising. Once people tried the product, they came back for more.

As the company grew, there was a need for more room to operate. One building which was immediately available was the former grade school building in the nearby community of Bogue. “I went to Bogue Grade School and my sister was in the last class to go to Bogue before it closed and consolidated,” Butch said. They bought the old school building and furnished it with new equipment. Instead of helping young minds to grow, now the building is helping a new product to grow.

Bogue is a truly rural community with a population of 174 people. Now, that’s rural. Yet from this facility, beef products have gone to all 50 states.

The steaks can be ordered at Trios Tap House in Hays and Six Mile Chop House in Lawrence, but they are primarily sold online. A number of companies purchase packages of America’s Best Steaks as Christmas gifts for their customers.

In 2015, Butch and Jeff learned about an initiative called L-A-B for Launch A Business. The Center for Entrepreneurship in the K-State College of Business, with support from Kansas State Bank and others, was offering this opportunity to support entrepreneurs with creative ideas or new businesses. It involved training with KSU faculty and networking and mentoring with business leaders.

“We didn’t really have the time to do it, but decided we’d try it,” Butch said. “It was well worth it, we’re darn glad we did.” This initiative has helped them develop their future strategic business, based on their high quality product.

By beef eaters for beef eaters. It’s a fitting slogan for America’s Best Steaks. We salute Butch Billips and Jeff Hardiek for making a difference by adding value to their beef production. They will have a big “stake” in future business.

HAWVER: Depth of Greek crisis will have effect on KPERS

martin hawver line art

No, it’s probably not often that state employees or food prep workers at public school districts in Kansas pay much attention to Greece, except maybe wondering whether they’ll ever be able to afford a vacation to the historic European nation.

Well, that’s changing…at least for the next month…while the economic problems of Greece have a pretty direct effect on the solidity of those employees’ pensions.

What do Greece’s economic troubles have to do with Kansas pensioners? It’s what happens to that over-borrowed economy, and international bond traders’ views on whether Greece is going to go broke, and by implication, make it impossible for Greece to repay its borrowings from the European Economic Union.

Stay with us here…because if the European Union isn’t going to be repaid for its lending to Greece, the value of EU bonds will drop…and the world’s bond traders won’t be eager to buy those bonds.

That means that United States bonds will be less risky investments for bond traders, who avoid risk, and U.S. bonds will sell at lower interest rates because those risk-avoidance bond buyers will settle for a little less interest return on their investments if they are rock-solid.

That’s how bonds work, and the more unsettled the Greek economy—and by implication, the European Economic Union which is the major lender to the Greek government—the better chance that U.S. bonds will carry lower interest rates because of their near-guaranteed ability to pay off those bonds.

Whew…enough of that international stuff.

But where it hits home with that state employee or food service worker is that the lower the interest rates that U.S. bond buyers will settle for in return for safety that they will get their money back, the better chance Kansas has in the next few weeks of issuing $1 billion in bonds for the Kansas Public Employee Retirement System.

Finally, the Kansas link.

Those bonds will give KPERS money to invest to produce earnings that will help pay for the state employee and school district employees’ pensions.

But…only if the interest rate paid to buyers of those bonds plus some administration and issuance fees total less than 5 percent of the bonds’ value.

That’s the hard line. If the state can get those bonds sold in the next month, and the interest and fees and such are less than 5 percent of that billion dollars, we sell the bonds and start investing the proceeds at hopefully more than 5 percent, and start making money with which to pay those pensions.

Above 5 percent? No sale. That means KPERS continues to inch along, with less money than actuaries believe is necessary to guarantee those pension payments, and that means that the state is going to have to either cut pension benefits—not really possible, a freeze is more likely—or start kicking in more money to the pension system from general tax revenues.

Now, watching KPERS become more fiscally solid is of course a good thing, but lawmakers and the governor would prefer that be done by KPERS investing that $1 billion, and making enough money to take care of itself and build reserves without more taxpayer dollars, which if you’ve been paying attention are a little tight right now…

Nobody, of course, wants Greece to go broke.

But, we have about a month to try to get those KPERS pension bonds issued, and…well…a little more hassle over Greek and European economics probably helps chances for Kansas pensioners.

Who’d have thought those far-away economic problems would be a key to Kansas pensions? We’ll see how that works out…

Syndicated by Hawver News Co. of Topeka, Martin Hawver is publisher of Hawver’s Capitol Report. To learn more about this nonpartisan statewide political news service, visit www.hawvernews.com.

SCHLAGECK: This vacation, remember agriculture

John Schlageck writes for the Kansas Farm Bureau.
John Schlageck writes for the Kansas Farm Bureau.

All across our country Americans are checking their automobiles, installing GPSs, studying road maps, printing off directions from MapQuest and adding another item to their “to do” lists in preparation for long-awaited summer vacations.

Anticipation will soar and expectations will rise as husband and wife teams take to the American highways and byways in search of rest, peace and tranquility. Children will ensure this dream remains only partially fulfilled with road questions like: “I’m hungry, I want a hamburger and fries.” “Mommy, Billy is teasing me.” “Are we there yet?” and “I don’t want to go on vacation, I want to go back home.”

Regardless of such comments, mom and dad will remain true to their plans and push ahead. After all, the money spent for the family vacation usually represents cash left over after paying for the family’s food, clothing and other necessities.

Oftentimes money to pay for vacations goes on plastic and is paid for later with interest. Parents will think to themselves, “We worked hard for this time off. We deserve it and we’re going to enjoy it.”

Americans remain the luckiest, most pampered people in the world. Try to imagine what it would be like if we had to be self-sufficient.

What would happen to leisure time if others did not produce the many things families need?

Although we all work throughout the year, we should not forget those people who also work hard and help us free up time so we can vacation with loved ones. One such group is the Kansas farmer.

Farmers and ranchers help meet our food, fuel and fiber needs. These needs are met without worry of availability.

The next time you walk into your local supermarket, remember milk comes from carefully cared for dairy cows on someone’s farm. Remember the butcher performs a service in cutting and packaging the hamburger, chops and steak you and your family eat. Don’t forget the Kansas farmer and rancher cares for and produces pork and beef. Styrofoam cartons only hold the eggs which are laid by hens on the farm.

No other nation of people on this planet enjoys the amount of free time we do. No other country can claim that so few people feed so many.

Today, less than 2 percent of our nation’s population are farmers. They are capable of supplying the other 98 percent with most of the products we eat, wear and use to fuel our vehicles.

As you plot your vacation course this summer, and as you motor through the state’s highways, remember to notice the fields of corn, soybeans, milo, alfalfa and recently harvested wheat. Take a look at the cattle, hogs and sheep grazing in the many pastures.

Don’t forget Kansas farmers and ranchers help fulfill our food, fuel and fiber needs. These professionals also care for the livestock and crops you see as you drive by. They do so with care and compassion.

John Schlageck, a Hoxie native, is a leading commentator on agriculture and rural Kansas.

MOVIE REVIEW: ‘Minions’ is unintelligible pandering

James Gerstner reviews movies for Hays Post.
James Gerstner reviews movies for Hays Post.

“Minions” is a spinoff prequel based on side characters from the “Despicable Me” franchise. That sentence, in and of itself, is tiresome. It’s not enough that Hollywood decides to make the same movie over and over again. In the case of “Minions,” the filmmakers decided to make a feature-length movie based solely around comic relief characters that – wait for it – don’t speak a discernible language.

I haven’t seen “Despicable Me” or its sequel, but like just about every other person in this country, I know who the Minions are. My YouTube play history would reveal that I’ve watched the “Minions” trailer on more than one occasion – a couple of minutes of gibberish-laden insanity is good for the soul, and it’s just funny to see a little yellow pill monster with heterochromia iridum (two differently colored eyes) do a mic drop. However, any more than five consecutive minutes of this nonsense is just too much. I’m all for stupid funny, when its done right, and I’m a big believer in the idea that a moment enjoyed is not a moment wasted. That said, I don’t see the sustained enjoyment in “Minions.”

From a filmmaking perspective, “Minions” is pretty, but it’s badly disjointed, poorly written and a staggering example at just how predictable movies have become which is amusing when I didn’t know what the hell was going on for most of the film.

Screen Shot 2015-07-13 at 11.52.24 AM

[Slight “spoilers” ahead] There’s a moment where one of the main characters apparently isn’t going to make it which is followed by the long, mournful pause. I’ve seen a lot of movies, I knew full well what was going to happen. The other adults in the theatre knew what was going to happen. Amusingly, even the seven-year-old who sat behind me knew what was going to happen – I heard her whisper to her dad, “He’s not really dead. He’s going to come back.” She didn’t say it in a hopeful or tearful manner. She said it confidently – the way a seven-year-old will tell you the new fact they learned about dinosaurs or the way a toddler will tell you they successfully went poop. That little microcosm of the predictability of film was very interesting to me. Who do filmmakers think they’re fooling? They’re certainly not fooling the adults, and apparently even the kids have that trick on lockdown. Maybe when the success rate for a particular joke or dramatic turn reaches absolute zero, maybe then it’s time for a change?

All said, don’t bother with “Minions.” It’s inane, insane and has a distinct lack of brain-stimulating anything. My suggestion is to watch the “Minions” trailer or go find a Minions compilation video. Even better, go see “Inside Out,” it’s absolutely everything “Minions” is not and is still easily my favorite film of 2015.

3 of 6 stars

The foreign student trade imbalance

John Richard Schrock is a professor at Emporia State University.
John Richard Schrock is a professor at Emporia State University.

If I wait to return to the United States in late July or August, I will have to pay hundreds of dollars more in airfare. There are over 270,000 Chinese students coming to study at American colleges and universities. Airlines use this surge in demand to charge what the market will bear; their only constraint being the empty seats on the return flights to China.

These students join classmates already here. About half study in the science and related fields (STEM) and another heavy portion major in business. This influx of students has saved many U.S. colleges and universities from shrinking in size or closing. Their higher out-of-state tuition has served to subsidize American student tuition at a time when state legislatures are abandoning support of higher education as a public good.

Economists calculate how much money foreign students spend in university communities beyond the tuition fees. Higher academics turns out to be a major source of income. If all Chinese students were concentrated as the sole students of state universities, they would fill the equivalent of all of the public universities in Kansas three times over!

Since 1980, the U.S. has become dependent on some Asian graduates staying in the U.S. to fill critical positions in science and engineering. If we dictated that all foreign-born scientists and engineers leave the U.S., most areas of U.S. engineering would collapse today followed by physics, chemistry and biochemistry tomorrow. Foreign-born scientists now file the majority of patents.

They surpass us in every indicator of science advancement. For instance, only 15 percent of American students graduate in STEM fields in the U.S. But half of Chinese students and 60 percent of Singapore students chose science majors.

Until ten years ago, a larger portion of our Asian graduates sought jobs in the U.S. But that is changing. Since the U.S.-initiated Great Depression of 2008, many see greater opportunity back home.

This summer, I visited universities in Guangzhou, Nanjing, Shihezi (in Western China), Yangling and Beijing. In every case, there were professors and administrators who had been to the United States to study for at least a year, and often for a more extended time to get a masters or doctoral degree.

With so many students returning to Chinese industry, government and academia, there are America-savvy graduates embedded in every small community. If some local provincial spouts a belief that all Americans ride horses and shoot guns—as he has seen in some movies—there is a returnee nearby to correct that misconception and who can say: “I’ve been there and it isn’t that way.”

Simply, with 270,000 Chinese students coming here each year who speak enough English to get through our bachelors or masters or doctoral programs, and who live here for two to six years, and with a growing proportion returning to embed in Chinese society—China knows the United States.

In contrast, there will be from 11,000 to 13,000 U.S. students go to China this coming year. Unfortunately, the vast majority of them will never speak Chinese with any depth nor will they stay to study for several years. Most will spend but a few weeks sampling food, visiting various Chinese operas and museums, and trying to write a simple Chinese character with an ink brush. I call these superficial tours “make-a-pináta-courses” (wrong culture, I know).

A much smaller number of American students will stay to learn the basic language and spend several years understanding modern China. These hundreds that return each year are spread far too thin across American society to correct the many misconceptions we hold about China.

Yes, China “knows” the United States.

But the United States does not “know” China.

And that makes us very dangerous.

Copyright Eagle Radio | FCC Public Files | EEO Public File