We have a brand new updated website! Click here to check it out!

The First Amendment and the power of ‘fear’

Gene Policinski is senior vice president of the First Amendment Center
Gene Policinski is senior vice president of the First Amendment Center

President Franklin D. Roosevelt once said that “the only thing we have to fear is fear itself.” In a world wracked by terrorism, that carries even more meaning today.

When FDR spoke those words in 1933, the threat was the economic and social impact of the Great Depression. Today, it’s the always-present threat of terrorist attacks that provokes deep-seated fear among Americans — with the target being our society and our freedoms.

The 2015 State of the First Amendment survey being released today is the latest in the annual sampling conducted since 1997 by the Newseum Institute’s First Amendment Center. The survey checks public knowledge and opinions about our core freedoms of religion, speech, press, assembly and petition.

This year’s survey results — based on phone interviews with 1,002 adults nationwide in mid-May — offers more proof that fear can put at risk our most cherished freedoms to believe, say and write what we will, and our ability to seek change in how our government operates.

In 2014, just weeks after the terrorist bombings at the Boston Marathon, 38 percent of respondents to the survey said the First Amendment “goes too far in the rights it guarantees.” This year, that figure fell to 19 percent — noteworthy in itself, but also an echo of the survey’s findings in the years following the 2001 terrorist attacks.

In 2002, about eight months after 9/11, the survey found that the number of Americans who thought we had too much freedom stood at 49 percent — only to drop to 39 percent in 2003 and as low as 13 percent in 2012.

And here’s where we need to be fearful of the impact, power and influence of fear.

We know that from almost the beginning of the republic, threats to public safety and national security have caused us to accept laws and executive action that we’ve later rejected, repudiated and even recoiled from. Just seven years after the Bill of Rights was ratified in 1791, Congress cited fears of inciting a war with France in adopting the Sedition Act, which forbade criticism of Congress and the president. The act was used to jail 18 editors, but produced such negative national reaction it was allowed to lapse just two years after going into effect.

President Abraham Lincoln is known for protecting and expanding freedom — but he jailed editors, closed as many as 200 newspapers critical of the Union and his policies, and suspended other rights, saying these actions were necessary to win the Civil War.

Fears during World War II resulted in roundups, internment and, often, the loss of property and businesses of more than 100,000 Japanese Americans. In 1988, President Ronald Reagan signed the Civil Liberties Act, offering the nation’s apology and compensation to those who were incarcerated in internment camps during World War II.

The intersection of fear and official reaction is the constitutional rub: Emotions shift and tensions subside, but laws — even those limiting our more basic freedoms — have permanence.

Earlier this year, we witnessed this in the continuing debate over surveillance and security portions of the Patriot Act, which initially was passed in the highly emotional atmosphere immediately after 9/11. We saw that even widely criticized elements of that act have proven difficult to reverse.

When nearly half of us say we have too much freedom, the atmosphere around even our most cherished rights can get clouded by claims of what must be restricted to protect public and national security.

To be sure, not every law passed in reaction to a terrorist attack or national emergency is suspect. After all, as the old saying goes, “You are not paranoid if someone really is after you.” And there’s no doubt that many “someones” are out to do this nation harm.

But fear is a powerful motivator, and knowing that so many of us would agree to surrender some liberty in the name of safety and security may just tempt those who would cross the proper lines of liberty as well as support the well-intentioned.

Defending First Amendment rights is most difficult when we are faced with affronts to our collective sense of what’s right, as when a few weeks ago, a handful of Westboro Baptist Church members brought their hateful messages to the funeral of Vice President Joe Biden’s son, Beau. Similarly, as the ever-present war on terror ramps up higher, it’s difficult to support the rights of critics to speak out against the nation, and to stand up for the rights of fringe groups and unfamiliar faiths.

Perhaps we can take a lesson from another time — and another place — where great fear enveloped the land: in 1940, when England stood alone facing air attacks and imminent invasion. Speaking to the House of Commons, Prime Minister Winston Churchill praised the Royal Air Force pilots who defeated Nazi air power at that critical time: “Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few.”

Churchill could just as well have been speaking of the need and necessity to defend just as staunchly — in the face of fear today — the 45 words that make up the First Amendment.

For more information about the 2015 State of the First Amendment survey: newseuminstitute.org/SOFA15.  Join the conversation on Twitter: #SOFA15

Gene Policinski is chief operating officer of the Newseum Institute and senior vice president of the Institute’s First Amendment Center. He can be reached at [email protected]. Follow him on Twitter: @genefac

 

Donald Trump distinguishes himself

Donald Kaul
Donald Kaul

We live in a time of stunning transformations. In recent weeks we’ve seen Bruce Jenner transition from a male Olympic medalist to Caitlyn Jenner, a self-assured woman gracing the cover of Vanity Fair.

Then there’s Rachel Dolezal, the ex-president of the Spokane, Washington chapter of the NAACP. She lived as a black woman until her parents revealed that she was not, technically, black. Czech, Swedish, German, and Native American, but not black.

Those transitions pale in the face of the latest political switcheroo: Donald Trump, real estate magnate and reality TV star, is now a proper politician. In case he did this too quietly for you to notice, he’s officially running for president.

This spectacle reminds me of an old story. Jack Warner, the head of Warner Brothers Studios, hears that Ronald Reagan, one of his former contract actors, is going to run for governor in California.

“No, no,” says Warner, mistaking the news for a film pitch. “Jimmy Stewart for governor. Reagan for best friend.”

I wish Warner were still with us. He might say something like: “No, no. Tom Hanks for president. Trump for court jester.”

For years, Trump has been content to serve as the nation’s favorite buffoon billionaire. Time and time again, in word and deed, he’s embarrassed himself without ever seeming embarrassed.

His announcement speech alone would have mortified a meeker man. On and on it went. In addition to slandering all Mexican immigrants and boasting about how he underpays website developers, Trump blurted out: “I beat China all the time.”

And to be fair, he’s laughed all the way to the bank. To put it mildly — which he doesn’t — he has a talent for making money. When he isn’t losing it.

The Donald has filed for bankruptcy four times, always seeming to come out richer than before. He’s earned a reputation as someone whose handshake on a deal requires a careful count of one’s fingers afterwards.

Until now, Trump had merely threatened to run for president. This time around he seems to be doing it for real — even though his most enthusiastic supporters at the kick-off event were actors, as Hollywood Reporter observed. They were paid $50 for their maniacal cheering.

Other candidates have broken barriers on race, creed, and gender. The Donald is registering another first.

It’s hard to find a serious previous or current contender without even a scintilla of a qualification. Sure, some of the other dozen or more GOP hopefuls have no chance at victory. Can you say President George Pataki without cracking up?

But at least that guy is New York’s former governor. Trump is bumping the bar to a new low while raising a great question: What are the proper qualifications for president?

Do we want someone smart (but not too smart)? With the common touch (but not too common)? Is broad experience in government (but not too broad) essential?

I suppose the answer is that we never know it until we see it. Even then, it often turns out to be the wrong choice.

Take experience. In the past 50 years the two presidents who exceeded all others in that department were Richard Nixon and Lyndon Johnson.

They’d each served in the military, in both houses of Congress, and as vice presidents. Their resumes were immaculate. Yet they both crashed and burned once in office.

And who was smarter than Jimmy Carter? He was a nuclear engineer for crying out loud. He’d been a liberal governor of a conservative state. And while he’s got a stellar record as a former president, his presidency was lackluster.

Then there’s Barack Obama, a whiz kid who can give a great speech and is a good guy besides. It’s been a rocky trip for him and a disappointment for his strongest supporters.

Do what you want to, but you vote for Trump at your own risk. Don’t blame me if you wake up one day to find a statue of The Donald sitting on Abe’s lap in the Lincoln Memorial.

OtherWords.org columnist Donald Kaul lives in Ann Arbor, Mich.

July 4th band concert on hiatus this year

The Hays City Band, which has maintained an annual tradition of performing a concert at Old Fort Hays on July 4, will not be presenting a program this year due to a variety of reasons.

The band plans to revisit the situation for the summer of 2016 and come up with a viable option that again offers live music to the Hays community during the holiday period.

The group appreciates the community’s support, and thanks everyone for their understanding in this year’s situation.

Jeff Jordan, Hays

Anything goes!

Les Knoll
Les Knoll

Nothing is sacred in this country anymore. Talk about transforming America! Our founding fathers would not recognize today’s America. They are turning over in their graves.

I am an optimist for the most part, but the way things have been going in recent months, I’m not sure we can turn this country around in 2016.

There appears to be an endless parade of liberal agendas turning this country on its head.

Let’s start with an out-of-control Supreme Court. A majority of the justices, including its chief justice, are now judicial activists. The majority is thumbing its nose at our Constitution. In the case of Obamacare federal government subsidies, the court by a 6 to 3 decision decided to become a legislative body rather than a judicial one.

Chief Justice Roberts, an appointee of George W. Bush, is making up stuff out of thin air as the court deliberates. Twice he has bailed out Obama’s Obamacare by inventing excuses to make it constitutional. When the Affordable Care Act was legislated Democrats screamed and hollered that it wasn’t a tax, but Roberts justified its constitutionality by saying it was a tax. Roberts is a deranged justice. This week he bailed out OC again by saying that even the law in seven different places requires subsidies by states only, out of thin air he said “state” means “federal.” Words no longer have meanings. What an incredible stretch by a justice!

Facts no longer matter. Our traditions no longer matter and everybody needs to keep in mind that this country became great because of its traditions – which now, under liberal agendas, are being dismantled one by one, piece by piece.

According to a majority of liberal justices, marriage no longer is between a man and a woman only. Is it all about love? Maybe for some, but the driving force of LGBT is about control, power, and “we will show you.” The 1% of our population will be ramming one thing after another down our throats and religious freedom will be the big loser.

Bottom line is that SCOTUS (the Supreme Court) had no business taking up this issue in the first place. It is not a constitutional issue, even though liberals claim it falls under the 14th Amendment.

If it’s all about giving “dignity” to same-sex partners, it is only logical that polygamists be given the same “dignity” by the “feel good” court. Right?

If a reader has any doubts about which way media leans, please note that most are celebrating the two court decisions, including local media.

We are no longer at a crossroads. We have crossed the line. In today’s America, cops are the bad guys. Cops are racist and so are most white Americans. Out of control black-on-black crime is due to white supremacy and it is “whitey” keeping minorities poor. The powers to be refuse to look at the number of kids born into a single-parent home. Facts don’t matter.

There is no end to what liberalism will do to get votes. Instead of looking at the economic status of this country under the present Obama administration, it’s all about distractions such as conservatives war on women (which is a lie), a racist country (which is a lie), homophobes (another lie), etc. And, no it’s not Republicans or capitalism causing inequality. It is liberal Obama agendas that are causing the poor to get poorer.

There’s something wrong with the picture I am seeing of late. What has the GOP done of late to stop Obama’s destruction of this country? Very little, if anything! Our Republican leadership in the Senate and House are being bought and paid for by big money, particularly lobbyists and donors. Money talks. Just follow the money and it’s clear Congress is not legislating in the best interests of people. A good case could be made we are no longer a democratic republic in as much as our legislators appear to be self-serving. The American people are up against career politicians in both parties.

God help this country if we don’t elect a new president and congress in 2016 that governs and legislates according to the will of the people. Thank God there are some Republicans that haven’t sold out.

And, I thank the Good Lord making it possible for me, at my age, to spend every day of the week with the best kids in the world as I volunteer my time teaching tennis. I pray these kids grow up in a better world economically and culturally than we have now.

Les Knoll lives in Victoria and Gilbert, Ariz.

MOVIE REVIEW: ‘Max’ is cute, but annoying

James Gerstner reviews movies for Hays Post.
James Gerstner reviews movies for Hays Post.

“Max” is a film about a military working dog who is adopted by the little brother of his fallen marine handler. Films with animal lead characters are tricky. Many of them are manipulative – they expose easy heartstrings and yank on them until the audience is in tears. Not that there’s anything inherently wrong with that; a good comedy finds the funny bone and taps on it for the entire film. That said, drama and comedy are two very different masks. Finding an exposed dramatic nerve and stimulating it for the sake of stimulating it can achieve the desired result, but the experience is somewhat diminished.

The base set-up of a military dog who lost his handler and who suffers from PTSD isn’t a bad set-up at all. Unfortunately for “Max,” the constant heartstring-pulling acts as a poor substitute for quality filmmaking – kind of like putting ketchup on a poor steak. Sure, it makes it taste better, but it certainly doesn’t make it a better steak.

There are a lot of pieces of “Max” that are just unlikeable. The human cast members are largely forgettable and in some cases are just plain irritating. The not overly complex plot is aided by lazy writing and unfinished thoughts. The biggest disappointment is the abundance of squandered potential. A mainstream film about military working dogs doing their jobs, that sounds great. A former military dog adapting to a new family, that’s fine. The director/writer combo of Boaz Yakin (director of “Remember the Titans” and a bunch of duds) and Sheldon Lettich (who is writing for the first time in nine years) weren’t able to find a good mix of those two concepts.

I love animals, and I love good movies about animals. “Max” is certainly a movie about an animal, but it’s not a good movie about an animal. Therein lies a subtle distinction that I care about as a critic; however, if your pet dictates when you do and do not use your electronic devices, such as a laptop or tablet, then “Max” just may pull on your heartstrings.

3 of 6 stars

HAWVER: Massive work yet to be done by 2015 Legislature

martin hawver line art

Not in recent memory has the sine die (that’s the formal name) adjournment of the Kansas Legislature left quite so much unfinished work for state government.

In the good old — or at least the old — days, that sine die adjournment was shaking hands, wishing fellow legislators a fun and productive summer, a little vacation planning talk. The high point for many lawmakers was the lifting of the during-the-session ban on taking campaign contributions from political action committees, businesses, unions, lobbyists and such. In the old days, there were actually envelopes handed to legislators as they walked to their cars—containing those campaign contribution checks.

But after this year’s sine die last Friday, there’s a real sense that this year’s work isn’t done.

And, it isn’t.

The immediate action will be watching this month and next for the governor, through his budget director, to cut about $50 million in spending which lawmakers will read about in the local newspaper. And, these cuts are unilateral, no legislative fingerprints on them, no legislation, no debate, no conference committee action, just the governor’s office looking for places to cut state spending with the minimum political effect on Kansans.

Which Kansans? That’s what insiders are looking for…will the prosperous who may occasionally need a Highway Patrol trooper to stand by while auto club workers change a flat tire on the Interstate or who need to renew their drivers’ licenses be inconvenienced?

Or, will Kansans who generally have more money spent on them—the poor, the sick, the children, the hungry—see cuts in spending that will show up almost immediately in their lives?

Or, of course, are there things that the state hires workers to do that just aren’t that important? This could be a thoughtful pruning of services the state has traditionally provided that not many even notice. Who really cares who takes possession of the antlers of a deer shot in someone else’s wheat field? Not enough hands go up to create much shade, do they?

Surprisingly, that $50 million in administration-ordered spending cuts might just create a few waves…but chances of that happening are slim.

The larger-spectrum effect of those cuts is to create about $80 million or so of ending balance in the budget for the coming fiscal year, enough to take care of emergencies and opportunities that might occur in the upcoming year. There are times that state government, like most individuals, just needs a little pocket change—though obviously the state’s pockets are considerably larger than even those loose-fitting jeans we tend to wear as we grow older.

Now, there is that other $50 million that a panel of judges just demanded the state spend on school districts… That’s a problem, which means if the state can’t wriggle out of it, there’s another $50 million to be spent from the relatively small fiscal year 2015 carryover from Tuesday (June 30) to Wednesday (July 1) that creates. But that $50 million is owed to schools, and wriggling out of it doesn’t sound right.

So, we have the upcoming cuts, the bill owed to schools, and if both are accomplished, then there’s about $37 million left in the treasury at the end of the next fiscal year. Probably enough, but it is dependent on all those tax increases passed this session that might, or might not, produce all the money that bookkeepers predicted they would.

Sine die adjournment? How about we classify that little exercise as just a breather, not exactly the summer off, but a break while non-legislative wheels of government are spinning and providing us some interesting money-moving and sliding of funding from here to there and hoping that it’s possible for us to at least scrape through until Jan. 11, 2016, when things start again…

Syndicated by Hawver News Co. of Topeka, Martin Hawver is publisher of Hawver’s Capitol Report. To learn more about this nonpartisan statewide political news service, visit www.hawvernews.com.

SCHLAGECK: Gathering the grain

John Schlageck writes for the Kansas Farm Bureau.
John Schlageck writes for the Kansas Farm Bureau.

It’s 10 a.m. and the sun blazes down on a patchwork of golden grain that dots the High Plains near Seguin in northwestern Kansas. A blistering southerly wind pushes the heat index to the century mark.

On this late-June morning, a roar of combines signals the latest edition of another wheat harvest. Cutting begins about this time each day and continues until midnight, or when the golden grain becomes too moist or tough to cut.

Fifteen-minute meal breaks are the only time off in a 14-hour workday. Although the days seem to last forever, technology has made life easy compared to the dusty, itchy harvests of yesteryear, when farmers sat on open-air seats and ate dust while sweat ran down their faces.

Modern combines come complete with contoured seats, soundproof cabs wrapped in tinted glass, air conditioning and stereos. Computers monitor the entire operation.

Across Kansas, farmers pilot these 12-ton machines as easily as the family car. Equipped with dual brakes, power steering and automatic transmission, these machines move through the fields at speeds of 5-miles-per-hour or more, depending on yield and field conditions. One machine can harvest more than 4,000 bushels of wheat on a good day.

Ask any farmer and he’ll tell you there’s nothing like cutting a field of wheat where the crop bunches up in the header and slows the combine to a crawl. Yields like that make farming and harvest fun.

And with crops like that, it doesn’t take long to fill up the bin. That’s when the grain cart waddles up next to the combine and 350 bushels of wheat is augured into the cart on the go.

It takes several hands to operate a harvest crew. Many producers operate one or two combines, a tractor operator pulls the grain cart and another couple helpers drive the semis, loaded with wheat, to and from the field.

There’s also usually one farmer who oversees or ramrods the wheat harvesting operation. He’s busy keeping an eye on moisture levels, making sure the machines are operating smoothly or lining up the next field to be harvested.

Farmers hate days when weather changes and the sun ducks in and out of the clouds. On such days they baby-sit the crop.

They test a field. Then move to another down the road, hoping to find wheat dry enough to harvest. No wonder farmers have been known to cuss the weather.

If and when harvest roars ahead full speed, it can be a frenzied time. Cutting the wheat and transporting this precious grain to the elevator or bin becomes the ultimate prize.

Man and machine race to beat the clock and weather. A storm with heavy rain, hail or damaging winds is every farmer’s worst nightmare and the possibility of such natural disasters is ever present during harvest.

Still, harvest is an event of beauty – the culmination of nearly nine months of growth, rejuvenation of the land and the ultimate prize – an abundant crop of golden grain. Seems like there are always moments of reflection when harvest is running smoothly, the crop is a good one and a farmer has time to stick his hands into a mound of wheat and pop a few kernels into his mouth. It’s at times like this, he’ll look out over the land he loves, where the machines are moving through clouds of dust and chaff.

“You gotta take what’s given you in this country,” they’ll think to themselves while chewing the wheat that’s by now turned to gum. “Some years, what you receive is better than others.”

A Kansas farmer takes risks that test the strength of his spirit. He faces harvest with the hope of bounty. He makes his peace with God and keeps that same peace with his neighbor. Faced with the annual trials of raising a wheat crop, this is the only way a Kansan would choose to live – with himself or anyone else.

John Schlageck, a Hoxie native, is a leading commentator on agriculture and rural Kansas.

MOVIE REVIEW: ‘Ted 2’ offers less and more of the same

James Gerstner reviews movies for Hays Post.
James Gerstner reviews movies for Hays Post.

“Ted 2” is a Seth MarFarlane-directed live-action comedy. Unfortunately, that sentence is losing a little of its luster. Don’t misunderstand, I love Seth MarFarlane’s sense of humor and the content that he produces; however, “Ted 2” suffers from many of the same problems that plagued “Ted,” in many cases, to a greater degree.

There are laughs, there is irreverence and there is referentiality, in spades. Those qualities together do not a great comedy make. Shock value is almost unattainable by MarFarlane at this point. He’s known as one of the most offensive comics out there and going for shock-value laughs is a dangerous game. Replacing quality with shock value is kind of like the comedic equivalent of substituting a cute dog for a good story (see “Max” review).

“Ted 2” certainly has its charms, but I doubt they will age well. A film like “A Million Ways to Die in the West” has grown on me since its release, “Ted” hasn’t and “Ted 2” certainly won’t. Seth MarFarlane is an fantastic producer and actor; however, his skill as a director hasn’t yet been fully realized. There are dramatic and comedic lulls in “Ted 2” that are distracting and break the momentum of the film.

Furthermore, there is something different about film comedy and television comedy. It’s somewhat easier for a television show to set up running gags and callback jokes when the distance between the original joke and the callback is great enough to make the callback seem like seeing an old friend again. In film, the time distance is much smaller and therefore the callback isn’t as novel and if the original joke was a less-than-stellar, the callback is wasted effort. My point being, MarFarlane is crossing the streams. His movies try to use television comedy approaches and sometimes it lands and other times it bounces off. “Ted 2” is about half and half.

4 of 6 stars

Exploring Kan. Outdoors: Black bears, lions and wolves, oh my!

Steve Gilliland
Steve Gilliland

It’s old news by now that mountain lions (aka cougars) were finally confirmed in Kansas s few years back.

After years of reports and much speculation (some folks even believing that Kansas Wildlife and Parks had transplanted mountain lions here in Kansas to help control burgeoning whitetail deer populations,) cougar sightings in Kansas were confirmed.

The first confirmed mountain lion sighting in modern times occurred in 2007 when one was shot in Barber County in south-central Kansas, and 9 more sightings have been confirmed by Wildlife and Parks since. The last documented cougar sighting in KS prior to that was in Ellis County in 1904.

Settlers on the Kansas plains would have found gray wolves, (aka timber wolves) living here, but by the turn of the century they had been totally eradicated from the state. In December 2012 coyote hunters in northwest Kansas brought down what appeared to be an extremely large coyote weighing around 80 pounds.

Tissue samples taken by the US Fish and Wildlife Service confirmed that the animal was in fact a gray wolf from the Great Lakes population. Gray wolves have been known to wander into Missouri and Nebraska from northern states but this was the first confirmed gray wolf in Kansas since 1900.

American black bears were also once common in eastern Kansas, but they too were exterminated from the state by the late 1800’s. About a week ago, a black bear was spotted at a couple locations in Cherokee County in the far south- eastern corner of Kansas.

Black bear sightings in that part of the state have become more frequent because of a growing population in the Ozarks since Arkansas initiated a restoration program there 50 years ago, but Missouri and parts of Oklahoma also support black bear populations. An occasional black bear also wanders into extreme southwestern Kansas also, probably from populations in Colorado and New Mexico. Grizzly bears also roamed Kansas during the same time frame as black bears and they too were gone by the late 1800’s and have never been seen here since.

Although a grey wolf sighting in Kansas is unusual, my point to all this is that we should not be surprised to see occasional black bears and cougars in Kansas given the fact that there are viable populations of them in most surrounding states. After all it has become fairly common to see a dead armadillo along the road now and then because they have moved north over the past few years.

So far the cougars and black bears seen here have probably been young males wandering through, and no evidence has surfaced that there are breeding populations of either in Kansas yet.

There are no hunting seasons in Kansas for wolves, bears or mountain lions and although they can be shot if a landowner feels their property or family is in danger, all attempts should be made to scare them away first. Just like us humans who occasionally wander from place-to-place as our populations increase or because we desire different surroundings, so also does wildlife wander, especially young males of the species as they seek breeding territories of their own.

As I see it, even more reasons to Explore Kansas Outdoors! (Carefully)

Steve Gilliland, Inman, can be contacted by email at [email protected].

Time marches on: ‘AgeSense’ can help

Linda Beech
Linda Beech

My Mother used to say time flew by more quickly as she got older. As a child, I didn’t understand what she meant. I admit I find myself thinking the same thing nowadays. But during the last three weeks, time seemed to lurch ahead and it has left me feeling much older.

It started with my 40th class reunion. I found myself surrounded by people who looked more like my classmates’ parents than members of the Southeast of Saline graduating class of 1975. Conversations included health issues, retirement plans and grandchildren.

Three days later, my husband celebrated his 65th birthday with a trip to the Social Security Office to complete his Medicare enrollment. He is now an “official” senior citizen.

My husband attended both of these events on crutches after a fall from a ladder at the beginning of the month that left him with a broken leg. Taking over his mowing, spraying, watering and trash duties has left me feeling much older and even more pressed for time. (He now agrees that since both of us are getting older, any future roof work will be a 2-person job with one on the ladder and the other steadying it on the ground.)

According to the K-State Research and Extension publication “AgeSense,” there are many ways to think about getting older. Aging can be considered chronologically, based on how many birthdays (or class reunions) an individual has celebrated. Getting older can be thought of in terms of functioning, with the focus on what a person can do rather than on how many birthdays he or she has experienced. Age can also be subjective, based on how old someone feels as opposed to how many birthdays they’ve had.

American society uses a generally-accepted definition of 65 years of age or older to determine when someone is considered “old.” Societal beliefs lean toward mostly negative attitudes and stereotypes about aging, fueled by the media and a youth-worshipping culture. But numerous beliefs Americans hold about aging are actually false. For example, older adults generally report a better sense of well-being than younger adults in research studies.

By examining personal attitudes and learning more about the facts of the aging process, people may decide that although aging is inevitable, a negative attitude about the process is not. Individuals with a positive attitude may reap many benefits. Research shows positive people actually do more for their own health as they age. They also are more functional, more likely to recover from disability and more likely to live longer.

The “AgeSense” publication suggests the SOC model as a way to adapt to the changes of aging. Selection refers to choosing activities and goals, Optimization is how people achieve their goals, and Compensation is used when new methods and behaviors for accomplishing goals are used. SOC is all about balancing opportunities and losses. It gives people a way to respond to everyday demands in an adaptive manner with the goals selected, the methods used to reach them and the strategies used to compensate when needed. In my husband’s case, by trimming tree limbs less often in the future (selection), he will make fewer trips up a ladder (optimization), and he will ask for assistance when he does (compensation.)

To learn more about positive aging, request the “AgeSense” publication MF3079 from the Ellis County Extension Office at 601 Main in Hays, 785-628-9430, or find it on the K-State Research and Extension website at www.ksre.ksu.edu/bookstore.

Linda K. Beech is Ellis County Extension Agent for Family and Consumer Sciences.

Selzer: National Insurance Awareness Day

Ken Selzer, Kansas Insurance Commissioner
Ken Selzer, Kansas Insurance Commissioner

Ken Selzer, Kansas Commissioner of Insurance

TOPEKA–National Insurance Awareness Day—this year on Sunday, June 28—is a time for insurance policyholders to reflect on insurance coverages they have. The Kansas Insurance Department (KID) encourages Kansas consumers to take stock of their policies, making sure that they are financially protected in case of loss, damage, illness or death.

“The peace of mind that comes from knowing your property, your life, your health and your belongings are protected is priceless,” said Ken Selzer, CPA, Commissioner of Insurance. “I urge you to review your policies and talk to your local insurance agent about the coverage needs of you and your family.”

To begin the process, Commissioner Selzer suggests reviewing the following ideas.

Homeowners/Renters Insurance
Update your home inventory of items to be sure your homeowners or renters policy is current for your needs. Note any antique items, collectibles, sporting or recreational equipment and their values. Talk with your insurance agent to ensure that they are properly covered.

When completing your home inventory, include as many details as you can, and take a photo of each item. If you are starting a home inventory from scratch, a free smartphone app, myHOMEScr.APP.book, takes some of the headache out of the process. Download the app from iTunes or Google Play. Also, on our ksinsurance.org website, you can print a hard copy of our Personal Home Inventory booklet; or, you can call us at (800) 432-2484 to request a mailed hard copy.

Auto Insurance
With vehicle coverage, liability is the part of the policy that pays for any injury or damage if you cause an accident. If your liability insurance is too low, it is possible that you could be sued for any damages above your liability limits.

Also take a look at your deductibles for comprehensive and collision coverage. This is the amount you will pay if your car is damaged or totaled without fault of another driver. Raising or lowering deductible amounts can affect your premium.

Before going on a vacation, make sure you have a copy of your insurance card and your insurance agent or company’s number in the car. It is also a good idea to have a way to record details of an accident if you are in one. The NAIC smartphone application WreckCheck walks you through the process of gathering information following a crash. You can then email your notes directly to your agent. Again, you can download the free app from iTunes or Google Play.

Health Insurance
Make sure to check your medical provider lists to verify that visits to your doctor and any specialists are still covered by your policy, because in-network or preferred provider lists could change from time to time. Also read through your documents and make note of your copays (the amount of money you pay up front for a provider visit) for in-network and out-of-network providers.

When you’re planning a vacation away from home, check with your insurance carrier to identify urgent care centers and hospitals that accept your insurance coverage near your destination. Be sure to ask your carrier about applicable co-pays and deductibles if care is needed.

More Information
If you have questions about your insurance options or about your insurance coverage, call the KID Consumer Assistance Division toll free (in Kansas) at 800-432-2484. If you want to learn more about insurance in general for all life situations, go online to www.InsureUonline.org, a national website provided by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners.

Huelskamp: SCOTUS engaging in radical judicial extremism

Huelskamp
Rep. Tim Huelskamp

WASHINGTON – Congressman Tim Huelskamp (KS-01) issued the following statement on the U.S. Supreme Court’s shocking decision on Obergefell v. Hodges. In an unprecedented act of judicial activism, the Court effectively rewrote the Constitution, silenced 50 Million American voters, and stole away the ability of 50 States to determine their marriage laws:

“The narrowest of a majority of the Supreme Court today engaged in blatant judicial extremism and subverted the clear language and meaning of the Constitution. For five unelected lawyers to claim that authors of the 14th Amendment, and indeed the entire nation, have secretly been violating the Constitution in the 146 years since is utter nonsense.

“By imposing their personal biases on all of America, these five attorneys have declared the votes of 50 Million Americans, including the 417,627 Kansans who voted to adopt my Marriage Protection Amendment, null and void. True marriage is between one man and one woman – no Court can change that truth. But with this opinion, these five judicial ‘ministers’ have not only bestowed their blessing on ‘homosexual marriages’ but, as Justice Roberts outlines, all plural unions.

“Worse still, the opinion of these five lawyers clearly threatens the liberties of the tens of millions of individuals, businesses and churches who refuse to accept the radical edict from Washington. Those who support ‘homosexual marriage’ are already demanding that government intimidate and coerce us to accept this radical redefinition. This is not just about wedding photos, cakes, or venues – it is the fundamental First Amendment rights we all have as Americans to live as we believe.

“Congress has a responsibility to push back against this extreme and to protect the rights of Americans to pass state laws and amendments that protect traditional marriage. That is why I am sponsoring the Marriage Protection Amendment, which would define marriage as the union between one man and one woman. I am also a sponsor of the First Amendment Defense Act, which would specifically protect the religious liberties of Americans and ensure the government cannot coerce us to participate in ceremonies contrary to the tenets of our faiths. Congress should take up these critical initiatives without delay.”

DAVE SAYS: Traps to avoid after graduation

Dear Dave,
I’m currently a senior in college. I’m completely debt-free right now, and I am wondering what I should do to stay this way after graduation.
Cary

Dave Ramsey
Dave Ramsey

Dear Cary,
You’re already primed for a great start. Doesn’t it feel great to know you won’t have a bunch of payments hanging over your head when you walk out into the world? I’m really proud of you!

There are three major traps I tell all new graduates to avoid. One, don’t buy or lease a new car. Save up and pay cash for your cars for the rest of your life. If you saved the amount of an average car payment — about $485 a month — and put it into a good mutual fund from age 25 to 65, you could easily retire a millionaire. Now that’s something to look forward to!

The second trap to avoid is rushing in to buy a house. The first few years after college will be some of the most volatile in your life in terms of career and relationships. Save up a big pile of cash and be patient. Too many young people today go crazy and buy houses they can’t afford just because their friends bought one, or everyone is telling them it’s what they should do.

Last, don’t ever get caught up in the credit card trap. Your income is your greatest wealth-building tool, so why would you want to take a chance on wrecking your future by sending everything you make to some bank? Live on less than you make, and live by a written, monthly budget.

I think you’ve got a really bright future ahead, Cary. Just remember to have a plan, pile up some cash and stay away from debt!
—Dave

Dave Ramsey is America’s trusted voice on money and business. He has authored five New York Times best-selling books. The Dave Ramsey Show is heard by more than 8.5 million listeners each week on more than 550 radio stations. Dave’s latest project, EveryDollar, provides a free online budget tool. Follow Dave on Twitter at @DaveRamsey and on the web at daveramsey.com.

Copyright Eagle Radio | FCC Public Files | EEO Public File