We have a brand new updated website! Click here to check it out!

After Charleston

Charles C. Haynes is director of the Religious Freedom Center of the Newseum Institute.
Charles C. Haynes is director of the Religious Freedom Center of the Newseum Institute.

The brutal murder of nine people at the Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church in Charleston, South Carolina on June 17 was an act of “racial terrorism” — to quote NAACP President Cornell Williams Brooks.

It was also a chilling assault on fundamental freedoms guaranteed every American under the First Amendment — the freedom to worship, the freedom to speak out for justice, and the freedom to assemble and organize for change.

What happened in Charleston must not be reduced to a story about a mentally disturbed “lone wolf” — as often happens when a young white man commits mass murder.

If we are honest, this attack is part of a larger story about the state of our culture — a culture in which white supremacist groups thrive, racism infects many institutions (including law enforcement) and indifference to injustice helps keep millions of people trapped in an endless cycle of poverty.

Mother Emanuel — as congregants lovingly call their church — was targeted because it is an historic symbol of the long struggle to overcome those ills.

Since its founding in 1816, Emanuel AME has been burned to the ground by white supremacists, twice closed down by city officials, and outlawed for some thirty years. But today the church still stands, having won its religious freedom the hard way.

Leaders of the church — from Denmark Vesey, a founder of the church and a freed slave executed in 1822 for organizing a slave revolt, to Rev. Clementa Pinckney, the pastor of the church killed in last week’s attack — can always be found on the front lines in the battle for social justice.

Black churches like Mother Emanuel are frequent targets for racial terrorism because, to quote Cornell Brooks again, “our churches have been at the crossroads of freedom.”

Throughout American history, black churches have served as the organizing center for African Americans managing, in the words of historian C. Eric Lincoln, “to survive obstruction” and endure as “the symbol of hope and determination.”

In a 2013 speech, Rev. Pinckney — who was also a state senator — describes the intersection of freedom and faith that is the legacy and mission of the black church in America:

“Could we not argue that America is about freedom — whether we live it out or not — but it is really about freedom, equality and the pursuit of happiness, and that’s what church is all about. Freedom to worship, and freedom from sin, freedom to be fully what God intends us to be, and freedom to have equality in the sight of God. And sometimes you gotta make noise to do that. Sometimes, you maybe have to die, like Denmark Vesey, to do that. Sometimes you have to march, and struggle, and be unpopular to do that.”

Now come the painful funerals, the heartfelt eulogies, and the outpouring of support for the grieving families.

But after the dead are buried and the media moves on, what will be the legacy of the “Charleston shooting”?

As I write this, Confederate flags are being removed from government spaces and symbols across the South — a welcome, if long overdue step in the right direction.

But if it took the murder of nine people in a church to get those in power to remove a symbol inextricably tied to white supremacy and violence, what will it take to bring about true social justice for African Americans in South Carolina and throughout America?

Ferguson, Baltimore, Charleston: It’s time to go beyond symbolic gestures and find the moral courage and political will to combat racism and hate by building a more just, equitable and compassionate society for every American.

For that, we will need to make a lot of noise.

Charles C. Haynes is vice president of the Newseum Institute and executive director of the Religious Freedom Center. [email protected]

INSIGHT KANSAS: The rest of the story

Growing up, listening to 1950s’ AM radio, I’d regularly hear the breathless, distinctive Paul Harvey talk about “the rest of the story.” It was true then, true now. There’s almost always something more.

Burdett Loomis
Burdett Loomis

This year in Kansas, despite the juicy, if distressing, headlines on the budget and taxes, the “rest of the story” is likely more profound and problematic.

First, the Legislature passed and the governor signed a bill that would explicitly subordinate the judiciary to the whims of Kansas lawmakers. The law (HB 2005, overwhelmingly supported by both House and Senate) ties judicial funding to a bill changing the selection process for county judges. Under the condition of “non-severability,” if one part of the budget bill is struck down, the entirety is, too.

In short, the Legislature has dared the court to rule against its policy on judges or face losing funds. And where would a case testing this law go? Right back into the court system and down an Alice-in-Wonderland rabbit hole.

Although Sen. Jeff King (R-Independence) states with a straight face that this is a matter of local control over judicial appointments, the much larger – and utterly unprecedented – issue is whether one branch shall dictate policy for another. Stay tuned for the rest of this story.

Less well-publicized, but of great long-term significance, is the move Republicans made to bring spoils system politics back to Kansas. For well over 120 years the trend in American politics has been to emphasize neutral competence within the bureaucracy, in reaction to the machine-style politics of the 19th Century, when the victor received the “spoils” – jobs, contracts, privileges – that flowed from winning elections.

Over the past fifty years, the administration of the state’s policies has been admirably free of partisanship. Scandals have been rare, and bureaucrats, despite their reputation, have strived to implement policies in fair minded and efficient ways. Beyond cutting the size of government, which sometimes makes sense, Governor Brownback and the Republican-dominated Legislature have substantially reduced the number of “classified” jobs, those protected from the ebb and flow of partisan politics.

Over time, this means that the GOP can further implement its new-style spoils system, which emphasize the loyalty of state employees to far-right and/or evangelical principles, rather than requiring workers simply to do their jobs well. The governor and others argue that the state needs “flexibility” in hiring workers. Andrew Jackson and New York’s Boss Tweed would be proud.

Mid-way through his radio broadcast, Paul Harvey would call out, “Now, page 2.” And there was always more.

This year our “page 2” includes the Legislature fulfilling Secretary of State Kris Kobach’s wish to prosecute vote fraud, given his view that local district attorneys have not been doing their job. A real-life, power-grab solution to an imaginary problem.

Likewise, lawmakers moved local elections from April to November in odd-numbered years, pretty much to demonstrate they could. Such a change has little meaning, but when turnout doesn’t improve, the push will come to change local elections to even-numbered years and make them partisan, per the Secretary of State’s desire for even more GOP advantage at the polls.

One more page-2 item. In its budget fiasco, lawmakers imposed restrictions on local increases in property taxes, eventually producing a bill that decreed that they knew better than local officials how to forge community tax policies. These are, of course, precisely the folks who absolutely despise federal mandates on the states and who have fumbled the state’s tax policies.

In sum, obscured by lengthy budget and tax battles, our governor and lawmakers politicized the bureaucracy, attacked the judiciary, and reduced local control over voter fraud, elections, and taxation.

As Paul Harvey breathlessly ended his broadcast: “Good day!” But not for Kansas.

Burdett Loomis is a professor of political science at the University of Kansas.

The etiquette of thank-you notes

Linda Beech
Linda Beech

The months of May and June are an especially busy season for gift-giving: graduations, baby showers, bridal showers, weddings and other special occasions.

When we give someone a gift, we try to choose something we feel they will really like.  We wrap it nicely and present it to them with great expectations.  We can’t wait to see their reaction and their “thank you” is music to our ears.

The people who give gifts to us feel the same way.  They want to know that their gift was received and that we enjoyed it.  The best way to acknowledge the gift and express appreciation to the giver is with a written thank you note.

Proper etiquette says that for any gift received, a thank you note should be sent as soon as possible. Even in the same town between relatives, a short written thank you note acknowledging the gift and the giver should be sent within a week, if possible. A handwritten note is best, but a printed note with an original signature is an acceptable option. Do not use email to send a thank-you note.  A verbal thank-you can be made in addition to the written note, but not in place of it.

The Basic Etiquette of Thank You Notes
A thank you note is an expression of appreciation for a thoughtful act, expression, or gift. But the potential formality of this situation can be intimidating. Many people think that the wording has to be perfect, and this causes so much anxiety that sometimes the notes are never sent. Before all the other rules, just remember that an imperfect note that comes with heartfelt sentiment is better than a perfect note that was never written.

In order to relieve some of the anxiety on this subject, here is a simple guide to the do’s and don’ts of thank you notes.

The Do’s of Thank You Notes

Do send your thank you notes as quickly as possible. Notes may be sent on informal stationery, except for wedding thank you notes which are generally sent on formal stationery.  Always make specific reference to the gift that is the subject of the note, such as “Thank you so much for the blue sweater. How did you know blue was my favorite color?”

Always send notes in the following situations:
• For wedding gifts.
• For sympathy flowers, memorial contributions or mass cards.
• To the hostess after a party that was hosted in your honor.
• For bridal or baby shower gifts.
• For gifts that were received by mail.
• After being entertained by your boss.
• For gifts received during a hospital stay.
• After being hosted as a houseguest for one or more nights (unless it’s a close relative or friend who is doing the hosting).
Thank you notes are not required in the following situations, but would still be a nice gesture:
• After being a guest at a dinner party.
• After a job interview (not required, but definitely a smart idea).
• When a friend has helped you out with a special favor such as babysitting, a meal when you were sick, or running errands for you.

The Don’ts of Thank You Notes

Don’t delay in sending thank you notes. Generally notes should be sent within a week of receipt of the gift or gesture. Being busy is not an excuse for neglecting a written thank you.  To tell someone (who has spent time and money on a gift for you) that you are too busy to acknowledge their efforts is bad manners! The only exception to this timing is thank you notes for hospital gifts which should be sent as soon as the patient is well enough to send them, whenever that is.

There’s no need to be untruthful if you dislike a gift. But, even if something is not to your taste, you should still show appreciation for the gift and the time, money and thought that went into selecting it for you. You can always say something like this– “Thank you for the thoughtful gift. I will always think of you whenever I see it.”

Linda K. Beech is Ellis County Extension Agent for Family and Consumer Sciences.

SCHLAGECK: Land is sacred

John Schlageck writes for the Kansas Farm Bureau.
John Schlageck writes for the Kansas Farm Bureau.

Almost every farmer has said in one way or another, “My life begins with the land.” Look at it any way you want but this bedrock principle remains as it has for generations. Land ownership is the key to farming and ranching. Farmers are proud of the crops they grow and the land they work.

From the time our first ancestors dropped seeds into the ground to today’s farmer who uses global positioning satellite, they were and are linked to the land. It’s who they are and defines the vocation they have chosen.

Many Kansas farmers and ranchers have raised their families, crops and livestock on ground that has been in their families for generations – for some more than 100 years. When producers farm land that long it becomes part of them. It is their way of life. Something they do each and every day. A vocation that always occupies their time and mind.

The land is something they cherish and love. Seeing it bring life to the seeds they sow is an experience farmers anticipate each year. They look forward to cultivating the crop and protecting it from insects that would cut yields and rob grain from people who depend on this precious food source.

Farmers also anticipate the coming of each year’s harvest when they gather the fruits of another year’s labor. Not only do this nation’s farmers produce great quantities of grain but they also take pride in producing a top-quality product – one of the finest and healthiest in the world.

Farmers often take better care of their land and livestock than they do themselves. The fondest wish of most farmers is to pass their land on to their children. They work for years, and often a lifetime, to leave a legacy of good land stewardship.

Most farmers learn about conservation and respect for their land from their parents. They continually seek new and better ways to work their soil to ensure they are able to pass it on to succeeding generations.

One farmer friend once told me, “If I thought for one minute I was ruining my land, I’d give up farming.”

Land is the lifeblood of a farmer or rancher whether it helps them produce grain or livestock. Producers have a deep-seated feeling of honor to be the owner and caretaker of land that has been in their families for generations.

They understand that one day they will pass from this earth but the land will remain. They strive to leave the land in better condition.

These stewards of the soil realize their ancestors came to this country and settled with the belief that it was the land of opportunity for them and future generations of their families. They hope their children will see this investment in the land the same way and leave the farm in better condition for their children.

Land is sacred for Kansas farmers and ranchers. They take their stewardship seriously. They’ve devoted their lives to safeguarding their farms and families while providing us with the safest, most wholesome food in the world.

John Schlageck, a Hoxie native, is a leading commentator on agriculture and rural Kansas.

MOVIE REVIEW: ‘Inside Out’ is a triumphant wonder

James Gerstner reviews movies for Hays Post.
James Gerstner reviews movies for Hays Post.

The Merriam-Webster dictionary site defines “art” as follows: something that is created with imagination and skill and that is beautiful or that expresses important ideas or feelings. In short, Pixar’s latest triumph, “Inside Out” is the very definition of “art.”

Great art, in its many wonderful forms, always expresses ideas and asks the hard questions. What does it mean to be a hero? What does it mean to be a villain? What is freedom worth? What is love? Worthy questions all. “Inside Out,” an animated “children’s movie” that takes place inside the mind of a young girl, dares to ask one of the greatest, if not the greatest, question of our species – what makes us, us? What is life but a collection of memories and the resulting chemical and electrical responses to moments past and a tenuous hope for the future?

I absolutely adored “Inside Out.” It’s brave, it’s beautiful, it’s unfailingly smart, it’s hysterical and it’s important. Everyone, everywhere, should see this movie immediately. Lead by a cast of wonderful voice actors, “Inside Out” takes us inside a gorgeous metaphor of a working human brain where Joy, Sadness, Disgust, Anger and Fear are more than cardinal emotions, they’re characters.

One of the film’s greatest technical and design achievements is the spectacular, mechanical construct that simulates neural processes. When the main character, Riley, has an experience, it is stored in a glass sphere as a memory that is color coded based upon the primary emotion and is eventually shipped off, via suction tube, to long-term memory for storage. The filmmakers made an unconventional setting feel real, scientifically feasible, and best of all, intimate. There is so much in “Inside Out” said without speaking a word, so many interactions that we all can relate to. The metaphor is perfect. This is a film that will be very entertaining to the kiddos out there, but as for me, I desperately want someone to this type of construct out of my brain. Therein lies the great victory of “Inside Out:” it made me yearn for introspection, turning within to find the answers. We are more than our jobs. We are more than our relationships. The human experience is shaped, every day, by everything. Each moment has a chance to become intrinsically core to who and what we are and not all of them are happy.

This film deserve the Academy Award for Best Animated Feature without breaking a sweat. That said, I want to see “Inside Out” nominated for, and potentially win, Best Picture. A lesser film would simply make the emotion Joy the hero and Sadness the villain. “Inside Out” courageously states the simple truths of the world that artists turn into masterpieces. Light cannot exist with darkness. Time and people change. The beauty of life is that it will fade.

“Inside Out” over-delivers on every promise it makes and makes real the elusive hope that there are new frontiers left to be explored. What a wonderful gift.

6 of 6 stars

HAWVER: Tax vote an early look at 2016 re-election campaigns

martin hawver line art

The election—the important one, for Republican candidates for the Kansas House and Senate in August 2016—is just starting to heat up.

No, not many candidate filings yet, no radio and Internet commercials or those little brochures stuck in the screen door—but that election is starting right now.

Reason? It’s that of the 97 Republicans in the Kansas House and the 32 Republicans in the Senate, the governor-approved tax package this session just passed by one vote in each chamber. That means 34 of those current House Republicans didn’t vote for the governor’s tax plan; 11 Senate Republicans didn’t, either. (No Democrats voted for the package.)

Hmmm…

That can’t be good for a governor who is just one year into his second and final term in office. It means, of course, that the Republican Party of Kansas can brag about its overwhelming majorities, but the titular leader of that party, Gov. Sam Brownback, doesn’t have the solid, stable legislature that he wants to enact…well, whatever he has left on his gubernatorial bucket list.

Lawmakers are, for Brownback’s purposes, sorta like a dog that won’t heel when you tell it to.

So, while there is still a legislative session left before August 2016, plans are probably starting now to prune out those legislators who campaigned under the Republican party label, but didn’t line up to vote for the governor’s tax package. They become the problem, and for Brownback’s purposes, might just as well have been Democrats, or children or illegal aliens or something else.

Practically, in most House and Senate districts in Kansas, because a majority of Kansans are registered as Republican voters, once you get the GOP nomination for the general election ballot, chances are good that you will get to spend winters in Topeka. That’s just the numbers.

So, for the governor, it is time to sort out the Republicans in the Legislature, and the governor is good at it. Look at the Kansas Senate in 2012, when Brownback and political and financial backers pruned the State Senate of most moderate Republicans and boosted the GOP majority to a near-record 32 members.

But the conservative shift in that election didn’t give the governor the certainty of passage of everything he could think up, and while he was involved in the House elections last August and November on behalf of Republicans, he was…how do you say it…distracted by his own reelection campaign.

For 2016, the governor has little to do except to dabble in the House and Senate primary elections and the general election.

So, that sorting has started: Which legislators are keepers and which need to be thrown back into the stream of the general public?

For moderate Republicans, this year’s tax votes show that they are close—with the help of Democrats, of course—to the majorities needed to repeal some of the conservative/Brownback inspired legislation passed this year and last.

But, that comes down to those pesky voters, the ones who, having gone out to lunch or were on vacation during the primary, just look for the letter behind a candidate’s name in November.

While Brownback and crew are pruning, voters might want to read those brochures, those e-mails and such, and identify that there are conservative and moderate Republicans, and maybe figure out where they personally stand. There’s R, of course, and then there’s R-squared.

And Democrats? They’ll benefit from Republican angst, when voters can’t decide whether the GOP candidate is too liberal, too conservative, or just about right. Ever think Republican-dominated Kansas would come to the time when voters might have to consider a Democrat vote the “safe” vote in determining where the government goes? It might get there next election cycle…

Syndicated by Hawver News Company LLC of Topeka; Martin Hawver is publisher of Hawver’s Capitol Report—to learn more about this nonpartisan statewide political news service, visit the website at www.hawvernews.com.

Exploring Kansas Outdoors: American Eagle Day

Steve Gilliland
Steve Gilliland

On June 20, 1872, the Great Seal of the United States was adopted, sporting the bald eagle at its center, and for the past 232 years the bald eagle has served as the living symbol of freedom, courage, strength, spirit, independence and excellence, all the things America stands for.

Last Saturday, June 20, was proclaimed nationwide as American Eagle Day as a way to celebrate the bald eagle, Americas living symbol of freedom and to bring attention to its dramatic recovery from the brink of extinction. In honor of that, here are some bald eagle facts and trivia.

In the early 1960s, the bald eagle population in the lower 48 states had dropped to less than 500 nesting pairs; today, thanks to conservation efforts there are nearly 15,000 bald eagle pairs in those same 48 states.

I found estimates putting the number of active bald eagle nests in Kansas alone at anywhere from 55 to 90, and more than 3,000 bald eagles spend time in Kansas each winter. The best time to view bald eagles here in Kansas is from November through February, and the best viewing is near any of our large lakes and reservoirs and anywhere along the rivers.

Bald eagles often build nests 50 feet or more off the ground. Nests are not particularly pretty, resembling a haphazard pile of sticks. The same pair uses the same nest year after year, making them larger each time, and after several years a bald eagle nest can easily be the size of a small room. The largest eagle nest ever recorded was in Florida and measured 9 ½ feet across, was 20 feet high from top-to-bottom and weighed an estimated 4500 pounds.

A female bald eagle lays from 1 to 3 pure white eggs once per year in the spring. When I still lived in Ohio there were numerous active eagle nests along Lake Erie, and a game warden friend of mine was in charge of overseeing those nests. He had hours of amazing video of them checking the nests and the chicks in them each spring. They did it by helicopter using 3 people; the pilot, a second person who was lowered from the helicopter down into each nest and a third person as a lookout, constantly watching the sky for the adult eagles to prevent them from flying into the helicopter blades, killing the eagle and crashing the helicopter in the process.

The majority of the bald eagles diet is fish and waterfowl, so when things freeze solid in the winter up north, the eagles migrate south to find open water where they can still fish. Even when our Kansas reservoirs freeze over, the rivers feeding each reservoir still offer open water.

I know ice fishermen often leave a few carp or other rough fish on the ice for the eagles. The huge influx of waterfowl through Kansas each winter is also a big draw to eagles. From their vantage point 1,000 or more feet above the ground an eagle’s miraculous eyes can spot prey over a 3 square mile area.

I just happened upon this proclamation of American Eagle Day as I surfed through the Kansas Department of Wildlife, Parks and Tourism website. I’m very disappointed it was not publicized far and wide prior to last Saturday.

Our media gives plenty of press to everything wrong in America; why not spend a little press on something like American Eagle Day that might just give us all something good to think about, if even for a day.

Steve Gilliland, Inman, can be contacted by email at [email protected].

INSIGHT KANSAS: 2015 legislative session was an epic disaster

The Kansas Legislature has adjourned after the longest session in its history. While high fives and fist bumps characterized the final acts among legislators Friday, in truth they went home with tails between their legs.

Chapman Rackaway is a Professor of Political Science at Fort Hays State University.
Chapman Rackaway is a Professor of Political Science at Fort Hays State University.

The 2015 Kansas legislative session was a disaster on par with the movie “San Andreas.” Only Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson wasn’t there to save the day.

By now the story is well-known. A massive deficit caused by significant income tax cuts had to be addressed by some kind of revenue increase just to keep schools operating. Cuts, as popular as they are with donor groups and voters, don’t play well in the reality of public policy. To avoid the session plunging beyond disaster into anarchy, new revenue streams had to be developed. The Governor announced he would veto any substantive reduction of his corporate and income tax cuts, so other sources had to be found. Governor Brownback’s own proposal, mostly predicated on alcohol and tobacco taxes, was dead on arrival.

What were the alternatives, though? None. Despite a cadre of new and supposedly creative lawmakers in the chamber, no alternative plans emerged throughout the session. Most legislators seemed to want to wait for the Governor or Speaker Merrick’s office to produce a plan. Eventually they got one – seven days after scheduled adjournment. Once they got it, they didn’t like it, and chaos ensued.

Legislators spent extended final weeks of the session (and a million dollars in overtime pay) scrambling for options, and a half-dozen competing plans emerged from burgeoning factions within the legislature. Some of the plans were so absurd as to raise taxes on Girl Scout cookie sales. In a remarkably ironic plot twist, taxes on all Kansans increased – the exact opposite of Governor Brownback’s initial plan despite his insistence to the contrary.

Democrats, failing to learn lessons from 2014, simply watched the GOP implosion in vain hope their collapse would allow a Democrat to back into Cedar Crest just as they expected Paul Davis to do a year ago. And Republicans have done their best to give the Democrats enough ammo to go to war on their failure alone.

While much blame will go to Governor Brownback, as it should, the real question of leadership and the biggest failure of the year should be directed towards the Speaker’s office. Where has Ray Merrick been, and what has he done, other than transform the legislature from a subject of derision into a subject of mockery? The Speaker apparently never coordinated with the Governor on a revenue plan, nor did he vet initial drafts with influential rank-and-file members or the House Tax Committee.

Keeping legislators in the dark about the most important bill of the session is on par with Nancy Pelosi’s infamous bromide about Obamacare that Congress had to pass it to know what was in it. Pelosi at least had the votes to pass her bill. Kansas legislators didn’t take the bait and pass the first thing presented, but at a cost of their own reputations with constituents and the exposure of competing coalitions within the legislature’s polar alliance Republicans that could be exploited by center-right primary challengers and some Democrats if either group can recruit, fundraise, and organize against them. The legislature, in a complete leadership vacuum, has served up a heaping plate of opposition research to 2016 challengers.

Like “San Andreas” or “The Towering Inferno,” the relief at the end of the 2015 Kansas legislative session is that it is over. The damage has been done, and perhaps minimized. Nonetheless, we have been witnesses to a disaster of historic proportions.

Chapman Rackaway is a Professor of Political Science at Fort Hays State University.

BOOK REVIEW: ‘Dead Wake’ by Erik Larson

deadwake copy

“Dead Wake” by Erik Larson

On May 1, 1915, with World War I entering its 10th month, a luxury ocean liner as richly appointed as an English country house sailed out of New York, bound for Liverpool, carrying a record number of children and infants. The passengers were surprisingly at ease, even though Germany had declared the seas around Britain to be a war zone.

augustine_marleah.jpg
Marleah Augustine is Adult Department Librarian at the Hays Public Library.

It is a story that many of us think we know but don’t, and Erik Larson tells it thrillingly, switching between hunter and hunted while painting a larger portrait of America at the height of the Progressive Era.

I’ve not experienced ship travel on such a grand scale, so much of the information presented in Dead Wake was new to me. I found it amazing, the adventure to be found on ships even as a child. The book starts slow, introducing relevant people and the preparations involved in Transatlantic travel.

The narrative picks up quickly when the ship is attacked by the submarine, and Larson effectively portrayed the desperation felt by some of the passengers. Norah Bretherton, who was on board with her two children, handed her baby to a stranger when she was rushing to also save her son; as a mother myself, this particular event really affected me.

My average rating is in no way a reflection of the quality of research in this book. Larson tracked down extensive details relating to the ship itself, its passengers, and the general oceanic travel zeitgeist. However, I felt that the narrative occasionally became bogged down in the details. In some situations, details were repeated, which was somewhat distracting.

I was also surprised by the lack of photos in the book — it would have been fascinating to see some of the documents to which Larson refers. In one instance, he directly refers to a painting of a scene that occurred after the sinking of the ship; since it wasn’t included in the book, I looked it up on my own.

I would have rated “Dead Wake” more highly had Larson done more showing and less telling.

China’s second-generation rich

John Richard Schrock is a professor at Emporia State University.
John Richard Schrock is a professor at Emporia State University.

Before 1980, all of the people of China were equal — equally poor. From higher government positions to urban school teachers, 700 Yuan (divide by 6 for U.S. dollars) was a top monthly salary.

Then Deng Xiao-ping announced “to get rich is glorious!” It was a massive change in economic policy. By allowing market forces to reward some, those new rich would in turn pull up the rest of the citizenry around them. If the goal was to improve the lives of Chinese citizens, then “it does not matter whether the cat is black or white, as long as it catches the mouse.” And the mouse was economic growth.

Deng’s policy was successful beyond anyone’s expectations. China has four and a half times more people than the United States. A portion of their population over twice the size of that of the United States has been propelled into the middle and upper classes.

But in my annual trips to China, I sense that times are changing. In an era of rapid change, many new words arise. One of them is pronounced: “foo-are-dye.” The “foo” is the common Chinese character seen during Spring Festival (Chinese New Year) celebrations, hanging in red on doorways; it means “prosperity.” “Are dye” means “second generation.” This is the name for the children of the newly rich, not too different from our use of “nouveaux rich.” For the first time, China has a massive generation of youngsters who are coming of age without any childhood experience of poverty.

Deng Xiao-ping’s philosophy that the new rich would pull up the poor worked because the first generation of newly rich remembered being hungry and living without electricity or plumbing as children. And that first generation of wealthy were eager and able to help others, and in particular their extended family members. In the 1990s and into the early 2000s, there was empathy for struggling neighbors still trying to climb the economic ladder.

But now a second generation of rich children have grown up and are entering business and management positions. And they do not have the experience background of their parents. Without the perspective gained from having a poor childhood, fewer from the second generation rich are fulfilling Deng Xiao-ping’s hope that the rich will pull up the poor around them.

I see this in the new residential high-rise communities that are replacing the older crowded apartment complexes. Just ten years ago, you could walk the streets in the evening and buy from sidewalk venders anything from food to toys to clothing and jewelry—and it was cheap. These street venders hawking their wares had no store rent or other expenses. But they were dressed poorly. The food carts left grease spots on the street. They encroached on space needed by a growing car population. And they just didn’t “look nice” to those living in the massive new residential apartments with the spacious trees and grass. More and more Chinese residents lacked empathy for the street hawkers and demanded they be moved out of view.

The police assigned this duty, called the “hawker patrol” in Hong Kong, have the thankless task of evicting these poor street vendors, and keeping the streets cleared. Cities now provide special areas of wooden stalls lining alleyways, or cheap side street shops. But these are numbered and rented, and that means added costs to pass on to buyers. The venders’ profits will be less.

The old folks often choose to be left behind in the countryside valleys, to live on and eventually die in conditions resembling 1930s Appalachia. Some retire and move into towns in a massive “townification.” The growing majority now living in cities have risen from Depression-Era conditions to approaching our standard of living. What took us over 70 years, they are achieving in less than two generations. And along with that is a growing attitude of “I got mine; you get yours.”

There is a Chinese saying that “Poor families produce good students.” Education is nearly worshiped here as the path out of poverty.

There is also a Chinese saying that a prosperous family lasts but two generations.

Exploring Kan. Outdoors: If only that old shed could talk

Steve Gilliland
Steve Gilliland

Today it’s nothing but a dilapidated pile of old lumber in the middle of a wheat field; so far off the road in fact that it takes binoculars to even see it there.

We locals don’t even notice it anymore and neither would anyone else were it not for the few trees and old windmill nearby. It was an old shed with a small grainery in one corner; the kind where you would shovel loose grain into the room and keep adding boards in the doorway as the level of the grain rose. There was once a house trailer there too that was the first home of some friends of ours when they first married. But to us the place will always be known as the vulture nursery.

115_6985

Several years ago I was told that a pair of turkey vultures had nested in the old shed for years. We slipped back there that evening, and sure enough, in the very corner of the little grainery room was a female vulture firmly planted over two eggs. Turkey vultures are most necessary to our environment and are part of God’s dead-animal-cleanup crew. They are the most amazing birds to watch as they soar effortlessly on the rising thermals, and they possess a digestive system so sophisticated and iron-clad that they can eat even diseased carcasses without harm.

Yet, in spite of all their merits, they are contenders for the homeliest creature God ever made.

With an old board we were able to gingerly lift one corner of mom vulture that night to see the two eggs beneath her, and she didn’t seem to mind much. Baby vultures begin life in the most humble surroundings imaginable. The old shed was on its last leg even back then. The only way inside was to squeeze through a small opening in one end, then clamor over and around stacks of old lumber to get to the grainery in the opposite end, all the while listening to the partially-collapsed roof above you creak and groan as you went. The nest was flat on the floor amidst mud and vulture droppings from past years.

DSCF1557

We paid regular visits to the old shed that year and watched the process unfold. Soon there were two pure-white balls of fluff that soon grew into two feisty vulture chicks that stood back-to-back and hissed at us each time we were able to view them without mom around. Then one day the nest was empty, but as we searched the sky, suddenly there they were roosting on top of the old windmill outside watching us from their new and better vantage point, while in the sky and always close, soared mom and dad.

No vultures have nested in the old shed now for years; its total collapse left the grainery in the far corner accessible from all sides, exposed to predators and the elements and I don’t think they feel secure there anymore. If only the old shed could talk and tell us about all the grain that was unloaded there, shovel-by-shovel over the years. And about all the kids that played within its walls and climbed in its loft. And yes, even about all the turkey vultures born and raised there.

Continue to Explore Kansas Outdoors!

Steve Gilliland, Inman, can be contacted by email at [email protected].

Waymaster: From the Dome to Home

109th Dist. State Rep. Troy Waymaster, R-Bunker Hill
109th Dist. State Rep. Troy Waymaster, R-Bunker Hill
June 15, 2015
Troy L. Waymaster, State Representative, Kansas House District, 109

Tax Policy for the State of Kansas: Senate Substitute for House Bill 2109
Friday, June 12, marked the 113th day of the 2015 Legislative Session, the longest session in history for the state of Kansas. Early on Friday morning, the House passed Senate Substitute for House Bill 2109 by a margin of 63 votes, the amount needed to pass out of the House of Representatives.

This tax bill was not the tax bill that I desired to address the financial issues with the state of Kansas, however given our lengthy session, we were approaching deadlines that were unprecedented and needed to meet our constitutional obligation of balancing the Kansas state budget.

The details of HB 2109 are: raising the state sales tax rate from the current rate of 6.15% to 6.50%; tax amnesty for certain delinquent taxes; guaranteed payments would be subjected to income tax rates; income tax rate freeze until the tax year of 2018; the Rural Opportunity Zones extension until 2022; with the exception of Charitable (100% deduction), Mortgage Interest, and Property Taxes (50% deduction), all other deductions would be repealed; and Cigarette Taxes would increase by $0.50 a pack.

There were also some policy provisions that were added by the Senate such as Sales Tax Exemptions, Property Taxes imposed by local units of government, and tax credits for scholarships. However, these policy pieces were changed by the House in Senate Bill 270 to not have the effect that the Senate had initially desired.

My true conviction is that this tax bill that passed the legislature, and now awaits the Governor’s signature, is not a long-term, sustainable tax policy.

In order to generate long-term stability for our state, we must readdress the tax policy that was passed by the 2012 legislature. That is the cause of the financial duress that our state is currently experiencing and the plan that passed will only be short-term. Due to the fiscal deadlines that our state was approaching and allotments that would need to be made to the budget, for example Fort Hays State University would experience a $32 million reduction, I voted “yes” thinking of the best interest of our state, residents, educational institutions, and our disabled citizens.

House Bill 2135
Senate Substitute for House Bill 2135 would authorize the Governor’s Director of the Budget, if the Director determines the unencumbered ending balance of the State General Fund will be less than $100 million, to lapse appropriations or transfer funding from special revenue funds to the SGF from Executive Branch agencies, up to a total of $100 million, for FY 2016.

This authority would not apply to appropriations for debt service; employer contributions to the Kansas Public Employees Retirement System; the Department of Education, except the operating expenditures account of the SGF; or demand transfers to the school district capital improvements fund.

This bill was passed to protect these funding measures from an allotment from the Governor. I voted “yes” on this measure and it passed both the House and Senate on Friday, June 12.

The Group of 28
During the final two weeks of the session, and with no solid tax plan in place, there was a group of 28 conservative Republican House members, I included, that contend we must address the 2012 tax plan. The leader of our group was Representative Mark Hutton from Wichita and we met regularly to discuss our position and drafted plans that we wanted to be included in the final tax policy that we hoped would be passed.
We were able for the tax conference committee between the House and Senate to allow for our plan to be debated and voted on the House floor, however it only received 27 affirmative votes. Later, we tried to meet with other groups within the House to compromise and hopefully have enough votes for passage.

There were five identifiable groups within the Kansas House of Representatives: The conservative base was split between two factions, ours included, moderate Republicans, Democrats, and then the legislators that were absent during the latter part of the session.

These meetings with the other groups, with the exception of the absent legislators, could not materialize because of differing ideologies, and the threat of non-passage of our position by the Senate and a veto by the Governor if components of our plan of reinstating LLC’s, sole proprietorships, and S Corps back on the income tax rolls, even at the lowest income bracket rate, we acknowledged that at this moment there would not be enough votes in our chamber to get to the magic number of 63 for passage.
Even though we were at an impasse, our group fought for our position until late Thursday evening. However, with the looming fiscal deadlines and the latest proposals of cutting our regent institutions, we had no choice but to accept the plan before us.
Later, we did hear from others in the chamber that voted “no” on our plan when it was debated and voted on the House floor said that our plan was the best solution for our state’s fiscal crisis.

Although we do identify that the plan that has passed is only a short-term solution, our resolve is to revisit our plan at the beginning of the 2016 Legislative Session.

Explanation of Vote and Contact Information
As your public servant, I feel that it is my duty that you are aware of my explanation of vote that I submitted to the House Clerk after voting “yes” and having it read before the entire chamber.

“Madam Speaker, I vote yes on House Bill 2109 in order to protect the solvency of our higher educational institutions for the state of Kansas. This committee report does not address all the possible revenue streams in order to resolve our financial calamity that our state currently faces, however as a representative of the Kansas House, we need to claim responsibility and make certain that we provide funding for our government and its needs. In extreme situations as in these, we need to make certain that we do not jeopardize our citizens, institutions, and our state.”

If you have any concerns, feel free to contact my office at (785) 296-7672, visit www.troywaymaster.com or email me at [email protected]

The honor to serve you in the 109th Kansas House District and the state of Kansas is one I do not take lightly. Do not hesitate to contact me with your thoughts, concerns and questions. I appreciate hearing from the residents of the 109th House District and others from the state of Kansas.

Troy L. Waymaster,
State Representative
109th Kansas House
300 SW 10th
Topeka, KS 66612

Tell me it isn’t so!

Les Knoll
Les Knoll

I don’t know whether to laugh or cry. It is laughable in a way, actually hilarious in that it is so far fetched. Unfortunately, what is so very sad, there are a lot of people who believe this off the wall rhetoric I am about to mention.

Has our president gone off his rocker claiming such things as drought in a Middle Eastern country causes radical terrorism because they are poor and striking out in frustration? And, the drought, or whatever, is caused by “climate change” that we can do something about? What happened to the ideology embracing Allah, Muhammad and the Quran and all that stuff about killing non-believers?

Then Obama goes on to say “climate change” could cause how our military fights terrorism as if it is possible to push a button to give our soldiers the best weather to go into battle? Maybe our Commander in Chief’s rhetoric is to test the waters, so to speak, for a script he is writing to a science fiction movie?

The claim radical Islamic terrorism is due to climate change and we can reduce the problem by changing the climate is preposterous.

Man’s emission of carbon into the atmosphere caused global warming didn’t fly scientifically, therefore, liberals unscientifically changed it to man’s carbon emissions causing everything under the sun; that being rain, snow, drought, hurricanes, tornadoes, cold weather, even warm weather. Just name it. That scenario in and of itself is an insult to one’s intelligence.

There is no definitive proof that a change in climate is caused by man period. There is no computer model that can capture all aspects of climate change and it is a lie that there is scientific consensus on this issue.

Obama’s goal to regulate current energy sources is nothing more than another attempt for big government to control more of our lives. The climate change issue is all about politics and very little to do about science. It’s even become a religion for some having nothing to do about facts.

Then, as he did with the Stimulus Bill in 2009, give millions of taxpayer monies to his friends and supporters to create green stuff. They will in turn take your money and mine and return a good portion to Democrat coffers. Surely, by now readers know that most of the green energy companies he gave money to in 2009 went bankrupt with taxpayers holding the bag, but Obama got back a lion’s share before those bankruptcies to run his 2012 campaign for re-election.

It is mindboggling to think there are people believing in our president and Secretary of State John Kerry that our biggest threat to national security is not ISIS, but climate change.

If climate change is due to man, why all the research coming from the scientific community where the data is fraudulent? Data is being doctored all over the place and causing many to lose respect for scientists who will do anything to get more federal funds.

If Obama and his leftist liberal friends have their way, we will see the biggest scam ever in American history.

Les Knoll lives in Victoria and Gilbert, Ariz.

Copyright Eagle Radio | FCC Public Files | EEO Public File