We have a brand new updated website! Click here to check it out!

Waymaster: From the Dome to Home

May 30, 2015

109th Dist. State Rep. Troy Waymaster, R-Bunker Hill
109th Dist. State Rep. Troy Waymaster, R-Bunker Hill

Troy L. Waymaster, State Representative, Kansas House District 109

TOPEKA

Tax Policy for the State of Kansas: House Substitute for Senate Bill 29 
Tax policy has been the leading agenda for both chambers of the Kansas Legislature this week. On Wednesday, May 27, the Senate debated and amended their tax policy legislation, which on final action failed 1-30. On Thursday, May 28, the House was beginning debate on House Substitute for Senate Bill 29, however failed to garner the two-thirds majority in the House in order to commence debate. On Friday, May 29, House Substitute for Senate Bill 29 was placed on General Orders, along with two other tax proposals to be debated on the floor of the House.

House Substitute for Senate Bill 29 has many different tax components. The most contentious item is the business income exemption temporary repeal. This bill would repeal for tax years 2015 through 2017 a provision that was enacted by the 2012 Legislature that exempts certain non-wage business income from the individual income tax rate. The bill stipulates that all such income would become taxable at the lowest income tax rate, currently 2.7%. The exemption would be reinstated at the beginning of the 2018 tax year. Also, the loss add-back requirement implemented by the 2012 Legislature relative to certain losses would be repealed for tax years 2015, 2016, and 2017, however would be restored for the 2018 tax year.

Also with House Substitute for Senate Bill 29, there would be a freezing of the current income tax rates at the 2015 tax rate of 2.7% and 4.6%. The rate reductions would be suspended until the 2018 tax year and then would be reduced according to existing statute.

The sales tax rate would also be adjusted in this tax proposal. Currently, the sales tax rate is 6.15% and this proposal would adjust the sales tax rate to 6.45%, with the rate reducing back to 6.15% on July 1, 2018. There would be a reduction on the sales tax rate on food and that rate would be 5.9% and would not be subject to the sunset provision of the regular sales tax rate. There are also provisions of eliminating the sunset provision for the rural opportunity zones, additional sales tax provisions for Bourbon, Douglas, and Thomas counties, and clarifying property tax levying for fire districts over 15 mills.

Governor Brownback Introduces New Tax Plan
On Saturday, May 30, which was the 100th day of the 2015 Legislative Session, Governor Sam Brownback held a news conference detailing the components of his latest tax proposal. The governor focused on income taxes and consumption taxes. His tax plan would eliminate income taxes for 388,000 low-income Kansans, which would be a reduction in tax revenues of approximately $18.9 million in fiscal year 2016. His proposal would freeze the current income tax rates through the tax year of 2017 and starting in 2018 those income tax rates would see a reduction. He also introduced in his tax plan of treating guaranteed payments for Limited Liability Corporations as wage income. Consumption tax increases from the governor’s plan would be a sales tax increase to 6.65% and increasing the taxes on cigarettes by $0.50. He also suggested simplifying the tax code by eliminating various deductions. The governor’s plan would generate enough revenue to have a positive ending balance in 2016 of approximately $81 million. Each chamber is now reviewing the governor’s plan.

Liquor Law Changes
This Friday, we also debated the conference committee report on House Bill 2223, which addresses an array of changes to the liquor laws in the state of Kansas. The bill would allow drinking establishments to sell and serve alcoholic liquor infused with spices, herbs, fruits, vegetables, candy, or other substances.
The bill would ban the sale and service of powdered alcohol, would allow public venues, clubs and drinking establishments to offer automated wine devices, and allows alcoholic beverage distributor licensees to provide samples of spirits, wines, and beer, allows any person engaged in business as a Kansas vineyard with more than 100 vines to apply for an annual vineyard permit.

The bill would also allow cities to pass ordinances allowing liquor retailers, microbrewies, microdistilleries, and farm wineries to locate within 200 feet of any public or parochial school, college, or church in a commercial district. House bill 2223 would allow the Director of ABC to issue a sufficient number of temporary permits for the sale of wine and beer at the Kansas State Fairgrounds. Another provision is that farm wineries would be able to apply for a sales permit at farmer’s markets that allow for the sale of wine.

The two largest changes to the existing liquor laws are the allowance of the consumption of alcohol on unlicensed premises and at the Kansas State Capitol. The first would allow alcohol to be consumed at businesses that do not sell alcohol; this is also referred to as the BYOB provision. This has been an issue throughout the state where art businesses are having painting parties and allow individuals to bring their own alcoholic beverage, namely wine. Current law states that the business needs a liquor license, even in cases where patrons bring their own alcohol. The other is allowing alcohol at the Kansas State Capitol, only for official state functions that are nonpartisan in nature, and would require the prior approval by the Legislative Coordinating Council.

The conference committee report for House Bill 2223 passed the House, 89-31.
Tax Discussions Continue and Contact Information
There have been many tax proposals discussed either in bill format or in meetings through the past couple weeks. However, it appears that none of those tax plans will be able to receive the needed 63 votes in the House and 21 votes in the Senate to pass and then go to the governor’s desk for his signature.

There has been a group of legislators in the House, including myself, that have been meeting to deliberate about tax legislation that will address the revenue shortfall that we are experiencing and, at the same time, restructure the tax policy for Kansas by adding long-term revenue stabilization. We have been meeting multiple times a day to discuss proposals and strategies. Our intent is to pass tax policy that will be greatly beneficial to the people of Kansas and create a stable revenue environment.

If you have any concerns, feel free to contact my office at (785) 296-7672, visit www.troywaymaster.com or email me at [email protected]
It is an honor to serve the 109th Kansas House District and the state of Kansas. Do not hesitate to contact me with your thoughts, concerns and questions. I appreciate hearing from the residents of the 109th House District and others from the state of Kansas.

Troy L. Waymaster,
State Representative
109th Kansas House
300 SW 10th
Topeka, KS 66612

Hays Public Library: Readers, Assemble!

Lucia Bain is Kansas Room librarian at Hays Public Library.
Lucia Bain is Kansas Room librarian at Hays Public Library.

Summer means different things to different people. I tend to idealize summer like a Country Time lemonade commercial.

You know what I mean: bike rides down dirt roads, rocking in chairs on the front porch, and swinging out over a body of water on an old rope. Other people think about going on vacation or sleeping late or eating outdoors. I’m not sure when or why these associations and fantasies begin, but they do and they stick with us for a lifetime.

Movies are released the whole year round, but the industry saves the biggest, splashiest movies for the summer.

Without fail, there’s always a super-hero film released. This year we’ve already seen the release of “Avengers: Age of Ultron” and, later this summer, “Ant Man” and “Fantastic Four” will premiere. People can’t get enough of super-hero stories and usually when we can’t get enough of a certain type of character or protagonist it means that we want to play that protagonist in our own lives.

In short, we all want to be super-heroes. This year, the Hays Public Library gives you that opportunity.

The summer reading theme for 2015 is “Every Hero has a Story.” Movies are great fun, but reading can open up whole new worlds beyond the silver screen. You’ll discover heroes you never knew existed. Children from birth to fifth grade can participate in this summer reading program that has lots of incentives and prizes including a pool party at the Hays Aquatic Center! Children can register any time until July 31st by visiting hayspublib.org or by visiting the library.

The super-hero theme is not restricted to kids, however, the whole library has adopted the theme for the summer. In each department you’ll find events to go along with the theme. In the adult department, for instance, you can attend a workshop on June 6th at 11 AM about “Super Hero Foods.” This workshop, hosted by Marleah Augustine will go over some facts and myths of popular super foods and participants will also learn to make some tasty recipes from nutrient-dense ingredients.

This part of Kansas was pioneered by some pretty heroic people. Who but a bunch of heroes could figure out how to use and mine post-rock limestone to construct fences, churches, homes and bridges? If you’re interested in the heroic history of limestone, you might want to consider signing up for a staycation to LaCrosse on June 6th. We’ll visit historical museums in LaCrosse including the Post Rock Museum and the Barbed Wire museum. We’ll head further south to Rush Center for lunch then pass through Liebenthal on our way back to Hays. Transportation and admission are included, but lunch is your own responsibility. Space is limited so call or email today: 625-9014 or [email protected]!

The Kansas Room’s summer movie nights will focus on heroes of Kansas and the old west. On June 23rd at 6 PM I’ll be screening Red River, a movie starring John Wayne and Montgomery Clift in roles that helped make them famous. If you like John Wayne or classic westerns, you won’t want to miss this one which features a cattle-drive to Kansas. Movies are free and open to all ages. Free refreshments are provided.

Finally, a great way to be a super-hero in real life is to donate blood. The library will be hosting a blood drive on June 29th from 1 PM to 4:30 PM. If you really want to help save someone’s life, consider donating blood! To make an appointment call 625-9014, stop by the library, or email [email protected].

The Kansas Room is located in the basement of the Hays Public Library and is open from 9 AM to 4 PM Tuesday through Saturday, and by request.

Lucia Bain is Kansas Room Librarian at the Hays Public Library.

Nanjing War Memorial

John Richard Schrock is a professor at Emporia State University.
John Richard Schrock is a professor at Emporia State University.

In a statue three-stories tall, a mother in rags silently cries out to the heavens while holding her lifeless child in her arms.

I am writing from Nanjing, China. And this is the entrance to the Nanjing War Memorial Museum.

Before Pearl Harbor and America’s entry into the war, the Japanese had long been expanding their conquest of China. At the end of 1937, Japan had taken Shanghai and moved inland to take China’s capitol, Nanjing. Chiang Kai-shek evacuated his officers and abandoned the population to a three-pronged Japanese attack that left no escape.

This slaughter of men, women and children is known as the “Rape of Nanjing” and stands in comparison with the Holocaust in Europe. While the war against China cost over 17 million Chinese lives, it was this six weeks of horror in Nanjing that defined atrocity. Over 300,000 civilians were killed. Babies speared on bayonets. Elderly shot in the back as they fled. Over 20,000 women raped and killed.

Whether it was to harden the Japanese troops, or the fury of war without constraints, the result was a month-and-a-half of terror when the rivers ran red. The poet W.H. Auden, who visited wartime China, wrote: “And maps can really point to places where life is evil now: Nanking and Dachau.”

I manage to keep the tears behind my eyes. The displays are historical photos and artifacts from real events. Signs in Chinese, English and Japanese indicate where silence is required. The museum is built on one of the many execution grounds—this is the burial ground of thousands.

But there is a major tribute to the heroic Westerners in Nanjing who organized an International Safety Zone that protected tens of thousands. Since Japan was not yet at war with the West, Western diplomats and missionaries and medical workers joined in sheltering refugees, especially Chinese women, at great personal risk. Few Westerners know that one of the greatest heroes of Nanjing was a German Nazi named John Rabe who headed the Safety Zone Committee, used his Swastika flags to ward off Japanese bombers and troops, and put his life on the line uncountable times to save civilians.

While my job in China is mainly to lecture at universities and edit, today is different. I have known for some time that I must come here. Near the end of this long museum, on an outdoor path, is a life-size statue of Iris Chang.

I knew Iris Chang only briefly. In 2003, when China sent up its first astronaut, I hoped National Public Radio would interview her. She had written the autobiography of Qian Xuesen, China’s “Werner Von Braun” who designed their space craft and was still alive to see the first astronaut lift off. NPR ignored the story. But this began my few short communications with her.

Iris Chang was an America-born Chinese, a journalism student at the University of Illinois at Urbana, with an intense drive to understand her heritage as well as achieve. And succeed she did: from a MacArthur Foundation Peace and International Cooperation Award, to Woman of the Year by the Organization of Chinese Americans, to two honorary doctorates. She was young, beautiful, and featured in the New York Times, Newsweek, and the LA Times. She also lectured on human rights, World War II history, Asian-American experiences, and appeared on the Jim Lehrer News Hour, Charlie Rose, and Good Morning America. She even made the front cover of Readers Digest.

These accolades however did not come from her biography of China’s rocket expert, nor from her second book “The Chinese in America.” It was her third book that brought on the ire of the Japanese government. She used the Freedom of Information Act to secure U.S. documents from 1937. She traveled to Nanjing to interview elderly survivors. And she discovered the diary of Nazi John Rabe, whom she called the “Schindler of China.” Her riveting book, The Rape of Nanjing, re-awoke international attention on an episode many preferred forgotten.

Iris had started a fourth book—on the Bataan Death March. She interviewed elderly soldiers who, in many cases for the first time, spoke of being ordered to bury their army buddies alive, or be buried alive themselves. According to her friend, the typist hired to transcribe those interviews “cried all the way through the work.” But Iris Chang—similar to many artists—was subject to emotional highs and lows.

On November 9, 2004, alongside a road in California, Iris Chang…used a handgun…to kill herself.

She is truly a hero in this museum today. But the casualties of the Nanjing Massacre are now 300 thousand…and one.

Gay marriage, gender identity and the future of religious dissent

Charles C. Haynes is director of the Religious Freedom Center of the Newseum Institute.
Charles C. Haynes is director of the Religious Freedom Center of the Newseum Institute.

Even LGBT activists were surprised by the margin of victory last week when 62% of Irish voters approved a referendum legalizing same-sex marriage — making Ireland the first country in the world to do so by popular vote.

The percentage of the Irish vote mirrors public opinion in the United States. A Gallup poll released on May 19 found that 60% of the American people now favor same-sex marriage. Just two decades ago, that number was only 27%.

The rapid shift in public support for gay marriage and LGBT civil rights in Europe and the U.S. has left religious conservatives scrambling to put spokes in the fast-moving wheel of social change.

At the same time the Irish were voting, a magistrate and former magistrate in North Carolina were filing suit to challenge the state’s requirement that all magistrates conduct same-sex marriage ceremonies in the same manner as other marriage ceremonies. The lawsuit seeks religious liberty exemptions for magistrates with religious objections to gay marriage.

That same week, religious conservatives in the Louisiana Legislature tried and failed to pass a bill designed to protect religious business owners who don’t want to serve same-sex weddings. Gov. Bobby Jindal was reduced to issuing an executive order that is much more limited in scope and, critics charge, may violate the state’s constitution.

Worried about backlash against Jindal’s action, New Orleans Mayor Mitch Landrieu countered by issuing his own executive order reaffirming the city’s commitment to prevent discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.

Meanwhile in Fairfax County, Virginia this week, conservative religious groups are fighting to stop a new sex education curriculum in one of the country’s largest school districts.

If, as expected, the curriculum is approved in late June, students will be taught that sexuality is defined as a spectrum of differences — heterosexuality, bisexuality and homosexuality — that may or may not change within an individual’s lifetime. The curriculum also explores non-conforming gender identities.

Earlier this month, the school district voted to add gender identity to its nondiscrimination policy, a decision that also sparked protests from some conservative Christian parents and pastors.

Evangelist Franklin Graham used Facebook to express outrage over the changes in Fairfax County. “School districts should not allow this poison anywhere near the classroom,” Graham wrote. “Wicked” policies and proposals such as those in Fairfax, he argued, result from school officials not upholding biblical principles.

Lawsuits, executive orders and heated Facebook posts may stir the passions of many religious conservatives, but such tactics are unlikely to reverse the tide of public support for gay marriage and LGBT civil rights.

Once the 60% threshold is crossed, there’s no turning back. As Dublin’s Archbishop put it after the Irish vote, “the church needs to do a reality check.”

Religious conservatives would be much better served if they took a page from Utah’s book and actually sat down with the other side.

The agreement reached in Utah earlier this spring isn’t perfect, but it goes a long way toward protecting LGBT people from discrimination while simultaneously providing meaningful exemptions for religious individuals and groups.

Of course, not all of the particulars of the Utah solution would work in other states — but the Utah spirit of dialogue and willingness to find common ground could be replicated anywhere.

As events unfold in North Carolina, Louisiana, Virginia and other states, religious conservatives clinging to a give-nothing-but-expect-everything strategy will get nowhere. Support for religious exemptions and protections will only be won by first acknowledging the need to protect LGBT civil rights.

At the same time, proponents of gay marriage and LGBT civil rights would be wise to avoid pushing a get-everything-but-give-nothing strategy. Sixty percent is a solid majority — but 40% represents a lot of people. After all, when the culture-war dust settles, we still have to live and work together as citizens of one nation.

In other words, our rights are best guarded when we stand up for the rights of others — including those with whom we deeply disagree.

Charles C. Haynes is vice president of the Newseum Institute and executive director of the Religious Freedom Center. [email protected]

BOOK REVIEW: ‘The Most Dangerous Animal of All’

Screen Shot 2015-05-29 at 8.48.20 AM

“The Most Dangerous Animal of All,” by Gary L. Stewart and Susan Mustafa

For decades, the Zodiac Killer has captivated America’s imagination. His ability to evade capture while taunting authorities made him infamous. The vicious specificity of his crimes terrified Californians before the Manson murders and after, and shocked a culture enamored with the ideals of the dawning Age of Aquarius. To this day, his ciphers have baffled detectives and amateur sleuths, and his identity remains one of the twentieth century’s great unsolved mysteries.

augustine_marleah.jpg
Marleah Augustine is Adult Department Librarian at the Hays Public Library.

If you’re interested in reading a book about a man grappling with his identity as he searches for his birth parents, this one’s not bad. If you’re interested in finally learning who the Zodiac Killer was, decades after the murders that terrorized the Bay Area, skip this book.

The problem with this book has nothing to do with its readability. Stewart provides a compelling account of the troubling relationship between his biological parents, supporting it with documents and photos, and the first part flows well, although later parts suffer from somewhat stilted dialogue. However, Stewart’s push to once-and-for-all reveal the identity of the Zodiac killer falls flat. Discrepancies abound, particularly when it comes to the reliability of the handwriting analysis and the lack of DNA results. The idea of a coverup by police is always intriguing, but in this case is doubtful.

Was Earl Van Best Jr. a despicable person? I think it’s safe to say yes. But was he the Zodiac? We will probably never know for sure.

 

INSIGHT KANSAS: New ideas and old in the 2015 Legislature

As this is written, the Kansas Legislature is approaching 100 days in session. It cannot be said that the session has been remarkably productive or representative of the best democracy can do, but it did follow the cycle of typical legislative activity with the notable exceptions of budgets and taxes. Always the elephant in the room, the state’s fiscal issues have not been resolved. The 90th day and now the Memorial Day weekend have passed.

Peterson IK photo

In the late days just before the holiday, and now that they have laundered their socks, our state legislators have had some time on their hands to develop some new ideas, recycle old ones, and discover, particularly regarding fiscal matters, ‘new’ truths.

A new idea? According to Senator Mary Pilcher-Cook (R-Shawnee), the federal Affordable Care Act’s mandated purchase of health insurance by the working uninsured forces the state of Kansas to create a tax on participating health insurers (to be passed on to premium payers, no doubt) to offset the costs (undisclosed) imposed on the state by ACA. What these costs might be are anybody’s guess since the state of Kansas chose not to create a state managed health insurance exchange, or embrace the expansion of Medicaid and its large federal subsidy providing a lifeline to many rural healthcare providers whose services to many low-income Kansas elderly are vital.

An old idea? The most obvious and unsupportable is that cutting income tax rates creates economic growth. It is a truth of market economics that high taxes stifle economic growth. That’s very true when tax rates are confiscatory and erode capital because the burden can’t be passed on to someone else in higher prices. The reverse is not true and especially not true when income tax rates are moderate, as they have been since the Graves Administration here in Kansas. As the current governor and his legislative allies have discovered after five years walking the walk and talking the talk, dropping income tax rates for small businesses and professionals only puts a little cash in the hands of the owners. It doesn’t prompt notable growth and expansion. Only increased demand does that and increased demand comes from people who have more to spend. Since the income tax cuts lightened the burden very little for most Kansans, and for many, property and sales taxes went up, expendable income and demand have gone nowhere.

And a new truth (or perhaps just a rediscovered truth)? Cutting taxes is so easy – and cutting spending is so hard! The peoples’ champions, those who pay homage to Rex Sinquefield and the Koch brothers and Grover Norquist, appear to be emperors without clothes. If they were real apostles of the conservative faith, they’d have no reservations about cutting half a billion out of the general fund budget to match the drop in revenue. Afterall, whatever government costs it’s too much; government does the wrong things; it transfers resources to the undeserving; and it only incentivizes bad behavior.

Can they do it? So far, no. But they do seem to be developing a taste for tacking on new tariffs on consumption. Instead of slashing spending and goring the oxen of many “cut them, not me” constituents, our enlightened lawmakers seem to be planning to raise the cost of cigarettes, gasoline, beer, booze, and all other merchandise, except perhaps food.

The result? Less spending by the people who make the cash registers ring, further reducing demand for those small scale entrepreneurial types and their prospects for economic expansion.

It is said that the definition of insanity is the repetition of past unsuccessful behavior in the expectation of a better future outcome.

Dr. Mark Peterson teaches political science at the college level in Topeka.

Teams walk their way to success

Linda Beech
Linda Beech

When 312 people joined 52 local Walk Kansas teams in March to walk the distance across Kansas, little did they know they would log enough miles to circle the globe 1.7 times!

Ellis County team members participating in the 8-week Walk Kansas program sponsored by K-State Research and Extension met the fitness challenge to “walk” Kansas– and then some.  Our walkers reported a total of 42,939 miles– enough to cross the state 101.5 times, or to travel from New York to Los Angeles 17.5 times!

This averages 2.45 miles– or almost 37 minutes– per person per day, for an average total of 258 minutes per week, surpassing the recommendation of 150 minutes of physical activity per person per week from the US Guidelines for Physical Activity.

In a parallel challenge to track fruit and vegetable consumption, team members reported eating 44,041 cups of fruits and vegetables during Walk Kansas.  That’s approximately 22,020 pounds or 11 tons of these healthful foods.

This averages 2.5 cups of fruits and vegetables per person per day. While this is a great effort, it still falls short of the daily consumption advised by the US Dietary Guidelines. The recommendations vary by age, sex and activity level, but most adults should eat 2-2.5 cups of vegetables and 1.5-2 cups of fruit each day, for a combined goal of 3.5-4.5 cups daily.  Low fruit and vegetable intake is a risk factor for premature death among Ellis County adults with 81% of adults in Ellis County consuming too few fruits and vegetables, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Kansas Department of Health & Environment.

Top mileage honors this year went to the Saints team which collectively logged 1,788 miles of exercise. The team which consumed the most fruits and vegetables was the Wonderful, Wacky Women Walkers of USD 432 team with1,693 cups eaten.

Team members reported many benefits from their participation in the Walk Kansas challenge.  While many reported that the team support kept them motivated, others mentioned specific benefits such as weight loss, increased energy, and the ability to sleep better, breathe easier and feel healthier.

Experts know that exercising controls weight, reduces risk of premature death from heart disease, helps to alleviate arthritis, reduces the risk of diabetes, decreases blood pressure, helps older adults become stronger and remain independent, helps lower cholesterol levels, decreases anxiety and helps to alleviate depression.

Physician Robert H. Butler once said, “If exercise could be purchased in a pill, it would be the single most widely prescribed and beneficial medicine in the nation.”

With all the health benefits of physical activity, it is no surprise that experts have determined there are also health costs associated with inactivity.  According to research done at North Carolina State University several years ago, the cost estimate for inactivity is $1,412 in direct and indirect health costs per inactive person per year.  By helping 312 Ellis County participants become more active, the potential estimated cost savings of Walk Kansas in Ellis County is $440,544!

Ellis County walkers were among over 16,000 people statewide who participated in the K-State Research and Extension Walk Kansas program.

If you’d like enjoy the benefits of physical fitness with a fun team atmosphere, plan to join Walk Kansas next year, March 20- May 14, 2016.  Until then, keep moving and eating well!

Linda K. Beech is Ellis County Extension Agent for Family and Consumer Sciences.

Revisiting, re-examining the news — with a free press purpose

Gene Policinski is senior vice president of the First Amendment Center
Gene Policinski is senior vice president of the First Amendment Center

The public furor and the televised flames that reached from Ferguson to Baltimore over the last 10 months have faded — for now — from the headlines.

For some, though, consideration of what happened and how the news of those events was reported remains very much in mind — an aspect of First Amendment freedoms we don’t often consider.

The first 45 words of the Bill of Rights protect religious liberty and freedom of speech, press, assembly and petition from government suppression, direction or prohibition. In doing so, it also provides us with the mechanisms to change the way our nation works.

But it’s up to us to use those mechanisms, and revisiting and reviewing are methods to that end.

Most recently, at a journalists roundtable in Washington, D.C., there was some frank discussion about how the news media report on protests and violence — how some do it well and others don’t. Advocates and critics of a free press both could find something of interest in that three-hour discussion.

For some, it started with what to call the events in Baltimore. “Who decided it … was it a ‘riot’?” asked one attendee.

For some, it was overheated rhetoric to use words like “riots” and “thugs” on the air, or to run headlines of the kind that said “Baltimore is Burning,” noting that that looting and violent incidents were confined to a near-downtown neighborhood and a few other areas of the city.

But others said “riot” was appropriate, used by city officials, as well as in news media reports. And some said they called the events “unrest” or “pockets of rioting,” to put the city’s situation more accurately and into perspective.

The time pressures on today’s news media emphasize tweeting, going “live” from the scene and to update at an instant — all robbing journalists and news consumers of the ability to present and receive perspective and context, a number of attendees said.

But new digital opportunities also make it possible for a reporter broadcasting a brief on-air report to produce a longer report for the online version of the news outlet. WTOP reporter Mike Murillo, who reported on-the-street from Baltimore, said the combination of the station’s quick-reporting on-air format and longer website posts offered flexibility. “I was able to go where the story took me,” he said.

Too often, many said, journalists report only the immediate event, focused on “the symptoms, not the problem itself,” such as a decades-long absence of jobs for the unskilled. One reporter said he “saw people who just wanted a good quote, instead of talking to people. There was shoddy reporting, because folks didn’t take the time.” But WEAA’s Carla Wills noted that the Morgan State University public radio station was able to use its long-time community ties, knowing “who to call and where to get the story.”

And then there was an account about a national TV reporter and his producer who wanted to keep young men on the street after 10 p.m. ET to be on a “live shot,” even though it meant the men would be violating a newly imposed curfew — a tactic decried by discussion attendees as “manufactured” news, not journalism.

The meeting was the latest in a continuing series of roundtable discussions led by national columnist Richard Prince, who writes “Richard Prince’s Journal-isms” for the Maynard Institute, focused on the issue of diversity in American news media. (He posted a summary of the discussion, a source used here as well as my own notes).

Why is just one such meeting worth noting? It’s just one of many such sessions that go on, small and large, daily among journalists on how to improve the craft — a positive process all too often drowned out by the negativity of those motivated to diminish the impact and engagement of a free press that reports on their actions and decisions.

And, as a mentor of mine once offered, while each life is a grand novel, the reality is that most live that life “in paragraphs” — in day-to-day events and decisions. Perhaps the grand and ongoing effort to improve a free press also rests with meetings that aren’t so much sweeping works of journalism as they are “paragraphs” for improvement.

Gene Policinski is chief operating officer of the Washington-based Newseum Institute and senior vice president of the Institute’s First Amendment Center. [email protected]

Waymaster: From the Dome to Home

109th Dist. State Rep. Troy Waymaster, R-Bunker Hill
109th Dist. State Rep. Troy Waymaster, R-Bunker Hill

May 22, 2015
Troy L. Waymaster, State Representative, Kansas House District, 109

Election Changes
Election law changes have dominated this legislative session, although not nearly as much as the state budget and taxes. There were numerous election law changes that were introduced at the beginning of session, and now we have all of the bills that either passed one of the chambers combined into one conference committee report between the House and Senate. The conference committee report that has been submitted is House Bill 2104, which addresses an array of different election topics.

First, this report addresses the removal of a candidate following the primary election. The new language would specify that a candidate can be removed from the ballot due to medical reasons, not living in the state of Kansas, and revising the law addressing the removal of a nominee who has passed away. Also, there are specifications and timeline provisions that must be met if replacing a nominee due to one of the before mentioned conditions.

House Bill 2104 would also change local elections from April to November in odd numbered years, starting in 2017. In addition to moving the local elections from the spring to fall, these local elections would still remain non-partisan. These elections are still to be administered by the county election officer.

The main argument for moving local elections from the spring to the fall of odd numbered years is to generate an increase of voter participation. Although I am weary there will be substantial increases, we do need to address the dismal voter turnout for spring elections.

The final component of this conference committee report is the cancellation of a 2016 Presidential Primary in Kansas and postponing the next one until 2020. By canceling the primary during the 2016 Presidential Election, and instead holding a caucus, the state of Kansas would save approximately $1.8 million.

We debated this conference committee report on Thursday, May 21, and the report passed by 64-58.

Tax Work Continues
The tax committees on the House and Senate both produced different tax policies that were debated in committee and passed out to each respective chamber. There has continued to be discussion among many House members, including myself, on what would be the most plausible tax policy that would garner the 63 needed votes in the House to pass out of our chamber.

The most accepted tax policy is looking back at the small business income taxes of 2012, perhaps increasing the state consumption tax to 6.5% with the consumption tax on food at 5.9%, freezing the current income tax rates on individuals with the potential of those income taxes being ratcheted down when the state experiences growth, imposing a small tax increase on tobacco and alcohol than what Governor Brownback suggested, and adjustments for the Managed Care Organizations privilege fee. We will see in the coming week which tax plan will be debated and voted on the House floor.

Working After Retirement
The House last Friday passed the conference committee report for Senate Substitute for House Bill 2095, which would make changes to the working-after-retirement provisions of the Kansas Public Employees Retirement System. Starting on July 1, 2016, a KPERS retiree would be allowed to receive up to $25,000 in compensation annually from a contributing KPERS employer, regardless of whether the retiree is returning to work for the same or a different employer, before the retiree would be required to either terminate employment or forgo monthly KPERS benefits until the end of the calendar year.

In the case of school districts, they would be permitted to hire a retiree to fill a special teacher position or any of the top five hard-to-fill positions, which are determined annually by the State Board of Education. Re-employed retirees would continue to receive full retirement benefits for up to three school years or 36 months, whichever would be less, during which the school district would pay to KPERS the actuarially determined employer contribution plus 8 percent.

The main objective of the bill is to limit what is commonly referred to as “double dipping” where a public employee is receiving both a salary and retirement benefit from the state at the same time. By restricting this practice, the state would be providing more stability to the state’s public pension system. Public employee retirees should have the opportunity to return to employment with the state, but it is not good policy to treat a current employee as both an employee and a retiree.

The Senate passed the conference committee report for Senate Substitute for House Bill 2095 unanimously last Thursday, May 14, and on Friday, May 15, the House adopted the conference committee report by a vote of 97-22.

Veto Session Continues and Contact Information
Even though the past few weeks during the veto session has produced many conference committee reports that have been debated and passed by both chambers, we are still awaiting the pivotal discussion and votes on the main items to wrap up the 2015

Legislative Session: Budget and Taxes.
The legislative schedule now appears that we will return after the Memorial Day weekend and then not have another break until these two items are ultimately addressed.

I do hope that everyone takes time during this Memorial Day Holiday to honor those that served in our military during times of war and conflict, and to especially reflect on the men and women of our armed forces that paid the ultimate sacrifice for their nation.

If you have any concerns, feel free to contact my office at (785) 296-7672, visit www.troywaymaster.com or email me at [email protected].
It is an honor to serve the 109th Kansas House District and the state of Kansas. Do not hesitate to contact me with your thoughts, concerns and questions. I appreciate hearing from the residents of the 109th House District and others from the state of Kansas.

Troy L. Waymaster, State Representative
109th Kansas House
300 SW 10th
Topeka, KS 66612

Schlageck: Tell the livestock story

John Schlageck writes for the Kansas Farm Bureau.
John Schlageck writes for the Kansas Farm Bureau.

Today’s livestock producers work in a noble profession. Unfortunately, not everyone believes this so people who care for animals must understand how consumers think and feel. Get inside their heads, if you will.

Consumers hold farmers responsible for the humane treatment of farm animals. In recent consumer surveys, people rated animal well being higher than the care and well being of workers in the food system but not as high as food safety.

It is not science, technical capacity or ability that drives trust. Instead, it is whether consumers believe agriculture shares their ethics and values.

Farmers and ranchers must talk about their commitment to doing the right thing – their commitment to values and ethics, not just science.

They have plenty of evidence to demonstrate they’re doing the right thing, but rely too much on such language. They must connect with the public on a value’s basis.

The most important job ahead is to communicate in a way that helps people trust what farmers and ranchers say and do. Too often livestock producers take for granted that rural neighbors know and understand who they are and what they do.

Agriculture can no longer take this for granted. Our industry continues to evolve and most of the people in the United States today are not involved in farming and ranching.

Americans know little about where their food comes from. They want to believe that what livestock producers are doing is consistent with their values and ethics. Telling this story includes showing people what is taking place on our nation’s farms and ranches.

That said, there clearly remain legitimate reasons like disease prevention and biosecurity not to allow unfettered access to farms and ranches.

Livestock production or animal agriculture in the most affluent country in the world faces special challenges and opportunities. Among those challenges is that Americans spend such a small percentage of their income on food that they can demand food where they want it, when they want it, in the proportion they want it and produced in a humane way.

Many food stores and food retailers have announced implementation of third-party verification measures to ensure food animals are treated humanely. In some instances, customers will demand third-party verification and if it doesn’t exist, the store providing the food may not be credible.

Agriculture can and will win the hearts and minds of consumers.

Farmers and ranchers must remember whom they are trying to influence. Customers and consumers need to hear from livestock producers.

It is not productive for the agriculture community to attack activist groups. Instead, agriculture must retake its rightful position as the people in charge of ensuring the humane treatment of animals.

Tell your story. Inform people at every opportunity how hard you work every day to ensure animals are treated fairly and humanely.

John Schlageck, a Hoxie native, is a leading commentator on agriculture and rural Kansas.

EXPLORING KAN. OUTDOORS: The toad abode

Steve Gilliland
Steve Gilliland

There’s just something about a toad that “conjures” up visions of a witch in a huge black hat with a big hairy wart on her nose stirring a bubbling pot full of potion and mumbling spells as she stirs. Toads just look creepy, and then of course there is that propensity they possess to pee on anyone picking them up.

Despite having a face only a mother could love, toads are extremely important to our planet. It is reported that a toad can eat ten thousand insects in one summer and are part of natures pest patrol (the person who did the counting for that study really needs a life!)

Toads begin their lives as tiny swimming tadpoles and eventually crawl onto land and begin breathing air, yet another of God’s creative mysteries. Toads, like other amphibians actually absorb air through their skin as well as getting it from their lungs with occasional breaths. They also absorb water though their skin rather than drinking it through their mouths.

DSCF1548

Because of toxins in their environment, toad populations are said to be declining nearly to the point of crisis, although I certainly see no evidence of that at my house. Raccoons, skunks and snakes are natural predators of toads. Besides protection from them, and pets which are usually mere annoyances, toads also need cool dark places to get away from the bright sun and weather.

Joyce has several large flower gardens and scattered throughout each garden she has created what she calls “toad abodes.” She takes broken clay or ornamental flower pots and turns them into cool, dark, secret hideaways for the resident toads.

She finds an already shady spot beneath a big perennial plant, then simply lays the broken pot on its side to form a little round-top enclosure into which the toads can easily crawl and hide themselves away from predators, pets and the heat of the day. One such hideaway is even made from the bleached white pelvic bone of a cow drug home from the woods by our grandson. Laid beneath a big plant with long slender leaves that hang down over it, the arched shape makes a perfect secret hideout for a toad or two. Any object that has room for a toad to crawl inside will work, and besides protecting the toads, they look very decorative and rustic in the flower bed too.

So the next time you buy your pet a new toy or treat, think about your insect removal friends too. Find a broken clay pot or bowl and place it in a new spot in the garden for yet another toad abode. And next year, when you ask yourself what in the world that broken pot is doing in your flower bed and pick it up to remove it, don’t be surprised to see a pair of dark eyes looking back at you from beneath it…Continue to Explore Kansas Outdoors!

Steve Gilliland, Inman, can be contacted by email at [email protected].

HAWVER: Toying with the separation of powers

martin hawver line art

Remember the separation of powers business you learned in school? You know, there’s the executive branch of government, the legislative branch of government and the judiciary, separate from the other two because there’s not supposed to be politics in the courts.

Well…there’s an interesting little provision in the Legislature’s yet-to-be passed bill that would finance the judiciary in Kansas for the next two years that has the Legislature dabble in the management of the Judiciary and maybe it is constitutional, maybe not.

Here’s the deal. The Legislature, dabbling, of course, tied the last two years’ judicial budget to a shakeup in court management that most people never heard about: Judges of the state’s 31 judicial districts will elect their local chief judge instead of having the judge appointed by the Chief Justice of the Kansas Supreme Court. Oh, and that chief judge in each of the districts can opt to take over the budget of each district, deciding which judge gets a new desk, more staff, whatever…

The judiciary, of course, wasn’t intrigued by this dabbling, seeing it as just the first baby step into injecting politics into the operation of the courts. There was opposition by the court to linking those organization policy changes and the budget for the courts in the same bill, but it happened.

And, the plot grew thicker when a district court judge from out west this spring filed a lawsuit asserting that the management issues that the Legislature inserted into the previous judicial budget bill were unconstitutional. That’s the appropriations/policy bill for the fiscal year which ends June 30.

Well, the new bill that finances court operations for the two years starting July 1 has that “non-severability clause,” too. Which means the policy issues in the nearly expired budget/policy bill will carry over into the next appropriation for the judiciary.

The new budget bill renews that non-severability clause, which means if the policy decisions the Legislature imposed on the court are found to be unconstitutional—by the courts—that because the policy issues and the budget are unseverable, the policy issues are thrown away and so is the appropriation to operate the courts.

Hmmm… Sounds a little like extortion, or at least a lesser included offense, doesn’t it?

So, if the dabbling with court management is found by the courts to be unconstitutional, there’s no budget for the courts. Any chance that might influence a court decision on the management provisions that the Legislature passed? Any chance that a judge hearing this case will wonder whether he/she can make his/her car payments if there is no judicial budget that provides their salary?

That’s just the first issue of the Legislature sticking its nose into the operation of a different branch of government.

And, of course, if that western Kansas judge wins his suit and lawmakers can’t essentially manage the courts, the issue then quickly turns to whether the non-severability clause cutting off funding for the courts works. That’s the bigger issue that will have wider ramifications on the public than judges deciding who runs their district court.

Of course, there’s a chance that the non-severability clause is unconstitutional for some reason other than just not feeling right to some grown-up Kansans. So, if the judge wins and the Legislature can’t dictate who manages the courts, that’s one thing, and it leads to the second step of this dance, whether a non-severability clause in itself is an unconstitutional overstep of the Legislature’s authority.

And, the courts will decide that one, too.

Syndicated by Hawver News Co. of Topeka, Martin Hawver is publisher of Hawver’s Capitol Report. To learn more about this nonpartisan statewide political news service, visit www.hawvernews.com.

REVIEW: ‘Tomorrowland’ poorly mixes message and narrative

James Gerstner reviews movies for Hays Post.
James Gerstner reviews movies for Hays Post.

The structure of a plot is one thing, the cohesion of an idea is quite another. Plot should enclose and ensconce its ideas and give them fertile ground in which to grow. Too much or too little rigidity encasing a narrative often times ends up exposing it to too little or too much light, a common threat to ideas.

I didn’t quite know what I should expect from “Tomorrowland.” I am happy to report that movie-goers won’t be sorry for their selection, even if they leave the theatre with a dent in their hats from the movie’s well-meaning, but overbearing theme. Film’s beating audiences to death with their messages has been done in the past; but regardless of “Tomorrowland’s” lack of subtlety, it’s message is worth hearing.

I wish that “Tomorrowland’s” execution had been smoother. The plot structure is rough around the edges, to say the least. You could even say that it’s outright confusing in some places, and it’s not even a difficult structure. For example, two of the male child actors in this film are nearly identical and they arrive on screen back-to-back. If I had a lifetime to examine them side-by-side, I would probably still get them mixed up. That’s poor casting of a dangerous sort that mislead me down a rabbit hole that I wasn’t supposed to exist.

With the exception of the confusing children, the cast of “Tomorrowland” is strong, even if no one gives a particular stellar performance. Britt Robertson, of “The Longest Ride” fame, is a rising star who will hopefully get better gigs after sharing the screen with George Clooney and the wonderful Hugh Laurie, who played Dr. House on “House M.D.” For the good of the industry, Laurie definitely needs to spend his tomorrows being a mainstream character actor.

At the end of the day, I liked “Tomorrowland,” and will always love the core concept and philosophy behind its message of dreaming, hoping and working for a better tomorrow. We, all of us, need to take care of each other and our planet. As a rule, we humans like to wait for our enemies to take concrete forms before we launch ourselves into the fight. That paradigm is certainly handy in the case of bears or terrorist threats. On the other hand, it’s about time that we start working on helping our planet before the entire thing catches on fire. Waiting for this one to be concrete may well be too late for you and I. If “Tomorrowland” can jolt some additional minds into caring about the world, then I am perfectly happy to have endured the clunky movie that surrounded the message.

4 of 6 stars

Copyright Eagle Radio | FCC Public Files | EEO Public File