We have a brand new updated website! Click here to check it out!

Duke, Muslims and the politics of intimidation

Charles C. Haynes is director of the Religious Freedom Center of the Newseum Institute.
Charles C. Haynes is director of the Religious Freedom Center of the Newseum Institute.

What began as a gesture of interfaith hospitality ended badly last week when Duke University suddenly cancelled plans to begin broadcasting the Muslim call to prayer from the bell tower of Duke Chapel every Friday afternoon.

The first “call to prayer” was scheduled for January 16 — which, as it happens, was also Religious Freedom Day in America.

Duke officials cited “security concerns” as the reason for cancelling the prayer call, but declined to elaborate on specific threats.

What seems clear, however, is that Duke came under considerable public pressure after evangelist Franklin Graham (son of Billy Graham) attacked the university for promoting terrorism in the name of religious pluralism — and calling on alumni donors to boycott Duke.

As he has done since 9/11, Graham uses every terrorist attack carried out in the name of Islam — in this instance, the murders in Paris — as an opportunity to conflate Islam with terrorism. He has famously defamed the Muslim faith by repeatedly describing Islam as “a very evil and wicked religion.”

In a Facebook post condemning Duke, Graham went so far as to link the planned Muslim call to prayer with the brutal attacks in Paris, citing the use of the phrase “Allahu Akbar” (God is great) in both.

Not only is Graham wrong about Islam — no reputable scholar of Islam supports his absurd contention that Islam is inherently violent and evil — he is dangerously wrong. By distorting Islamic teachings and history, Graham promotes intolerance, encourages extremism and chills speech.

What most concerns me about the Duke Chapel incident is not the debate about the propriety of a Muslim call to prayer from a church. After all, reasonable people of different faiths can disagree about the theological pros and cons of broadcasting a Muslim call to prayer from a church bell tower.

Instead, what’s disturbing about Duke’s cancellation is the perception — and perhaps the reality — that the university has allowed a “heckler’s veto” to stop the broadcast of a Muslim call to prayer from Duke Chapel.

Unfortunately, the prayer controversy at Duke is not an isolated incident. The about-face by Duke officials came during a period of renewed backlash toward American Muslims in the wake of the murderous terrorist attacks in Paris. American Muslim civil rights groups have reported a significant spike in anti-Muslim rhetoric, including a threat to blow up a mosque in Ohio and another threat to attack a Muslim conference in North Texas.

Islamophobia is a pernicious disease based on ignorance and fear — and fueled by extremists who have hijacked Islam for their violent and evil ends. It can only be countered by informing people of the truth about Islam and Muslims in America (interfaithalliance.org/americanmuslimfaq) and working to strengthen America’s arrangement in religious freedom for people of all faiths and none.

Now for the good news: Despite the timidity of Duke officials in the face of hate speech, Duke Chapel will remain a welcoming place to people of many faiths. Muslim students will continue to gather there for Friday prayer as they have for some years now. Hindu, Buddhist and other groups will continue to be welcomed to use space there as they have in the past. And the university will continue to have a Muslim chaplain to serve the spiritual needs of the some 700 Muslim students attending Duke.

No call to prayer rang out from the bell tower of Duke Chapel on January 16. But hundreds of Duke students — Muslim and non-Muslim — gathered that day to hear the call from a small speaker set up on the steps of the chapel.

In the end, students of conscience and goodwill came together to defy hate and intimidation, supporting their Muslim brothers and sisters by standing up for freedom.

Thanks to their welcoming spirit, Religious Freedom Day was celebrated at Duke University on January 16 after all.

Charles C. Haynes is director of the Religious Freedom Center of the Washington-based Newseum Institute. [email protected]

INSIGHT KAN.: With few moderates left, voter mobilization is key

Having begun in August, the continuous protests in Ferguson, Mo., now represent the longest period of active protests in the United States since Dr. King and Rosa Parks led the Montgomery Bus boycott in 1955.

MSmith2 edit
Michael A. Smith is Associate Professor of Political Science at Emporia State University.

 

In his recent politico.com piece about “the new civil rights movement,” journalist Gene Demby confirmed what organizers from Missouri have told me: today’s protests are not disorganized or random. They have nothing to do with the few nights of spontaneous rioting several months ago. Instead, the peaceful protests are organized and led “from below”— by a network of activists including pastors, community organizers, and young people who have mastered social media, instead of a few charismatic leaders like King. It also includes more female leaders. Activists seek policing reform nationwide, plus a second grand jury to review evidence in the Michael Brown case.

In his Letter from a Birmingham Jail. King focused on moderate, white church leaders who promised support but counseled “caution,” fretting about the movement’s civil-disobedience tactics. King responded by stressing “the fierce urgency of now.” He knew that a controversial decision had three targets: supporters, opponents, and the undecideds. This last group held the power and got the attention, because only the undecided could break the stalemate.

To whom would Dr. King address his letter today? Today, the strategy is to eliminate moderates, not persuade them. True undecideds have dwindled to a minuscule percentage of voters. Party activists, especially on the right, have purged moderate officials via primary elections and partisan appeals, for example in Kansas’ 2012 Republican primaries. Finally, membership is aging at Dr. King’s original target: mainline churches.

Thus, the new civil rights movement focuses on the inactive and alienated. Earlier civil rights activists also had their voter-registration drives and rallies; those are needed again. In Ferguson, for example, the elected leadership is almost entirely white, despite a majority African-American population. Dismal voter turnout explains this. We see this in Kansas, too— Emporia has a large Hispanic population, yet there is no Hispanic representative on the city commission or local school board, due largely to low voter turnout. Things are similar in Liberal, Garden City, and elsewhere.

Abysmal voter turnout in minority-heavy Kansas City, Kan., north Wichita, and east Topeka helped torpedo Paul Davis’ chances of becoming governor in a close race. If the new civil rights activists can raise political participation among these populations, they can elect officials who would have to be responsive, or otherwise forfeit their chances of re-election. Cynical voters may need to see tangible benefits like child care support, in order to be convinced that their votes matter. Low-income, urban voters were blasted for this by both Mitt Romney and Bill O’Reilly in 2012, but this is unfair: there are plenty of middle-class and wealthy voters that also expect a financial return on their votes.

Dr. King’s legacy will never be forgotten, but tactics must shift with the times. With moderates a dying breed, today’s fierce urgency is mobilizing the inactive.

Michael A. Smith is Associate Professor of Political Science at Emporia State University and co-author of the new book, “State Voting Laws in America.”

KPERS crisis: ‘We can work it out’

Tim Schumacher
Tim Schumacher

The 1965 Beatles song written by Paul McCartney and John Lennon could have just as easily been written by Governor Brownback concerning the Kansas state pension plan (KPERS).

A short two years ago the legislators decided it was time to stop “kicking the can down the road” concerning the solvency of the KPERS pension plan, and actually do something to properly fund the retirement plan of some 275,000 employees in the state of Kansas. After all, the KPERS website strongly states that it is their “fiduciary promise to you… always putting your interests first, and that your retirement funds are safe.” Of course when government officials make statements like “We can fix this if we work together,” the real translation may be “We messed up and you’re going to have to pay for it.”

The plan, which Governor Brownback touted as one of the biggest accomplishments in his first term, required employees to increase contributions from 4 to 6% over a 2 year period. This was a way to erase the $7.4 billion deficit by the year 2033. Right now the state’s Unfunded Actuarial Liability (what they owe the KPERS employees) stands at 64%, the second lowest in the nation. Although using an aggressive 8% rate of return in their assumptions, this legislation was at least a step in the right direction.

Fast forward to December of 2014 when the decision was made to cut contributions to the pension plan by more than $40 million in the next 6 months to help fund the $279 million state budget deficit. This is not a new technique, as governors (and legislators) have underfunded the retirement program for years.

The “Vested Interest” newsletter on the KPERS.org website states that retirees have nothing to worry about, as they have over $16 billion in assets, and are receiving contributions of just under $1 billion per year. Unfortunately, the number that is omitted is what’s being distributed to current retirees each year, a number that is $400 million more than what is coming in. Alan Conroy, executive director of KPERS, in 2013 stated that if strong investment returns continue, everything will be fine. The only problem with this is that investment returns are not always strong, as proven by the 2008-2009 years when KPERS lost over $1 billion in assets.

Sub House Bill 2333 passed in 2012 was not a perfect fix. Even though the percentage of employee contributions has increased by 2% as of 2015, the multiplier to calculate retirement benefits only went from 1.75 to 1.85- A 2% increase in contributions and a .10 increase in benefits. What a deal! Employees hired after 2009 also have a choice of increasing contributions to 8% or losing their cost of living adjustment (COLA), which shouldn’t be a real hard choice if they simply ask current retirees how many COLA’s they’ve received in the last 25 years. And although it was reported that the reallocating of funds would not affect current retirees, this is inaccurate. If the plan had been properly funded through the years, maybe current retirees would have received raises along the way, through the COLA benefit, instead of living on the same dollar amount from retirement to death.

In the past, there have been suggestions to correct the insolvency issues. Pushing the retirement points from 85 to 90 (this includes age and years of service), reducing benefits, implementing a defined contribution plan, etc., but the first thing any governor or legislator should do is decide to properly fund the plan and not take funds allocated to the pension plan for use elsewhere. This hasn’t been accomplished in the past, which is why the solvency of KPERS is in question now.

At retirement a choice is given to get at least 50% of your pension plan out of the KPERS program. There is not a tax consequence for this if it is rolled to an IRA. Your IRA also remains state tax free. (Make sure your accountant knows where the money came from). Careful thought should be given to this, however, as the KPERS benefit can be distributed at retirement, but the rollover IRA would have a 10% penalty if distributions are taken before age 59 1/2.

The lack of proper funding in both the state (KPERS) and federal (Social Security) retirement plans should give a notice to all to save in a personal plan not dependent on the government. Start young, contribute regularly and take your retirement success into your own hands.

It would take substantial measures to change the funding of the KPERS plan, measures that for years have not been addressed. So, although the promise from the state is that “We Can Work It Out”, if things continue the way they are, and you’re not addressing this on a personal basis, you might be singing another Beatles song.

“Help”

Tim Schumacher represents Strategic Financial Partners in Hays. [email protected]

Danger, dignity and decency

John Richard Schrock is a professor at Emporia State University.
John Richard Schrock is a professor at Emporia State University.

“Free speech is an absolute!” is the conclusion of many discussions of the murderous attack on the French satire publisher Charlie Hebdo and North Korean hack attack of SONY’s movie. This level of discussion is embarrassingly shallow.

Language that is only “offensive” is indeed protected. The U.S. Supreme Court decision in Hustler Magazine vs. Falwell stated “…that it is precisely because language gives offense that it needs to be protected. Indeed, if it is the speaker’s opinion that gives offense, that consequence is a reason for according it constitutional protection.” But there is other speech that is not protected.

Should we allow plans for an atomic bomb to be spread widely in newspapers or across the Internet? Of course not. When the chain reaction concept was born in the early 1900s, that research moved behind closed doors. College dissertations were defended in secret. Results were highly classified. Research on bacterial warfare was also “censored” from the public and much of it remains confidential today.

Just last year, a new technique for growing the deadly flu virus of 1918 in ferrets was embargoed by the scientific community. Young and naive scientists protested that the U.S. had never censored research before; they were ignorant of their own history. Just as we cannot yell “Fire!” in a crowded theater, we have good reason to prevent this “free speech” that could kill millions.

We also prosecute those who would advocate overthrow of the government or threaten the life of the President. A genuine threat to harm any person constitutes the crime of making a terrorist threat.

And what about human “dignity.” Consider the tragedy where teenagers were killed and mangled in a West Coast car crash. Those first on the scene took photographs and posted the gruesome images online, much to the distress of parents and family members. That is “free speech” in the U.S. but newspaper editors chose not to publish it—it would not be illegal but it is wrong.

But we do prosecute indecency. Obscenity is limited by a U.S. Supreme Court ruling. Kansas law allows physicians and teachers to use photos on sex education in the context of the hospital or classroom that we cannot display on the street corner. That limitation on speech is defined by community standards. In 1964, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart described his test for obscenity in Jacobellis v. Ohio: “I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within [‘hard-core pornography’]…. But I know it when I see it.” So communities establish their standards. But in the Internet community, the U.S. has no standard and little children view material they should not see.

Within these last months in the U.S., we have seen Islamic State (ISIS) rebels recruit online. Hundreds of teenagers have left their homes to join the war in Iraq and Syria. The wimpy U.S. response was to produce counter online advertisements. Blocking those recruitment websites was not considered legitimate because it was “free speech.” But other countries are willing to take action.

Article 19 of the U.N. Universal Declaration of Human Rights recognized in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights asserts that “…everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression…” in speech, print, art or other media. However, Article 19 also explains that exercise of these rights may be “…subject to certain restrictions.” Those limitations include respecting “…the rights or reputation of others” and “…the protection of national security or of public order, or of public health or morals.”

Foreign countries recognize the gray areas of free-speech. For instance, some European countries restrict libel of living persons on the Internet. And China has no qualms using their great firewall to block those Internet ISIS calls to come-and-kill. Why do we consider it a crime to threaten to kill another person in the U.S., but not a crime to recruit youngsters to kill people elsewhere?

Universities implement “hate speech” rules and cancel campus speakers—probably when they should not. “Free speech” is not a black-and-white issue. We do have laws that clearly restrict some speech. But there is a continuum of gray situations and different cultures will draw the line at different mid-points.

Some would argue that Internet censorship is a “slippery slope.” But some speech is not on a slippery slope, but at the bottom of a gutter.

REVIEW: ‘The Imitation Game’ is an unsung hero

James Gerstner reviews movies for Hays Post.
James Gerstner reviews movies for Hays Post.

“The Imitation Game” is a much smaller release than “American Sniper;” and while I have my doubts that it will ever come to Hays, it it nevertheless an incredible piece of filmmaking that tells the riveting story of the breaking of the Nazi Enigma code during World War II.

Benedict Cumberbatch leads a stunning ensemble of remarkable British actors including Keira Knightley, Matthew Goode, Mark Strong and Charles Dance – each of which is exceptional in their own right. Cumberbatch’s performance as Alan Turing, credited as the “Father of Theoretical Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence” is masterful. Cumberbatch’s Turing is every bit the solider of Bradley Cooper’s Chris Kyle even though their battlefields were decidedly different.

The writing for “The Imitation Game” is sublime. For a film like this to succeed it had to be. To make a room filled with mathematicians, chess champions and cryptanalysts feel as important and as thunderous as Allied soldiers landing on the shores of Normandy is no small feat. The dialogue is often brilliant and the editing and story structure, while initially a little disjointed, builds to an ending for the ages.

Like many films based on true stories, “The Imitation Game” has taken some artistic liberties. That said, this film is incredibly important and I strongly believe it needs to make its way into our public education system – not only for the hidden history of World War II, but more so for the big picture comparison about oppression. The oppression that so many members of “The Greatest Generation” rose to fight with everything they had, and the oppression that was allowed to continue, and has yet to be resolved.

“American Sniper” and “The Imitation Game” are two of the eight films nominated for Best Picture at this year’s Academy Awards. If I’m able to see more of them before the Oscars I will continue to provide reviews. My pick thus far, is easily “The Imitation Game,” and I sincerely hope the Academy recognizes its struggle and its bearing on current events.

6 of 6 stars

REVIEW: “American Sniper”

Regional farmers market vendor workshop offered in Hays

Linda Beech
Linda Beech

Farmers markets across the state are doing much more than just providing a source of fresh local food.  The vendors offering their products, as well as consumers taking advantage of those items are also stimulating the local economy.  There are now 130 active farmers markets in Kansas compared to the 26 in operation in 1987.

To help current and prospective market vendors, a regional Farmers Market Vendor Workshop will be held on Friday, January 30 at the KSU Ag Research Center Auditorium, 1232 240th Avenue in Hays.  The workshops are co-sponsored by K-State Research and Extension and the Kansas Department of Agriculture’s From the Land of Kansas trademark program.

The program will be held from 9:00 am to 3:00 pm.  Speakers, breakout sessions and panelists will provide helpful information for those who want to capitalize on the popularity of farmers markets in Kansas. Topics include vendor best practices, regulations, tips for marketing, sales tax requirements, accepting non-cash payments, labeling requirements, value-added food products and expanding your growing season.  Ellis County vendors Allen Schmidt and Tatum Kimzey will be included among the program speakers.

“Selling items directly to consumers through farmers markets provides producers a chance to develop their own business, but it has its own set of legal, safety and financial issues, too,” said Londa Nwadike, a consumer food safety specialist with K-State Research and Extension and the University of Missouri.

While vendors selling food items such as fresh vegetables, baked goods and homemade jams and jellies have special guidelines, vendors selling other items (crafts, jewelry, wood-working, etc) will also find useful information at the workshop.

The early-bird registration deadline is January 15 th.  A fee of $20 per person will cover the costs of the conference, including lunch.  A $5 charge will be added for those who register after January 15th or at the door.  Lunch cannot be guaranteed for late registrations.

Registration information for the January 30 th workshop in Hays and an online registration form can be found at: https://fromthelandofkansas.com/event/regional-farmers-market-vendor-workshop-northwest-kansas.

The Hays workshop is one of five regional farmers market vendor training conferences offered across the state in January, February and March. For dates and registration information for other locations, see www.fromthelandofkansas.com/FMConference.

Linda K. Beech is Ellis County Extension Agent for Family and Consumer Sciences.

HAWVER: Brownback tosses budget crisis at local schools

martin hawver line art

Gov. Sam Brownback’s first last-gubernatorial-term budget is out, and in some respects, it’s clever and it’s probably close to what he would have liked to have proposed several years ago, but couldn’t because of that darn election business.

Now, whether you 433,196 Kansans who voted for him for governor or you 436,306 Kansans who split your votes between Democrat Paul Davis and Libertarian Keen Umbehr (yes, the two got more votes than Brownback but that’s not how it works), Brownback won and he has pretty much free rein to put together a budget for the next four years.

You get the drift of where he’s going, and will get to continue to go unless Kansas voters—those with children or grandchildren or even neighbor children in public schools—don’t like the trend or maybe don’t like the trend.

In K-12 education his concept is fairly simple: Get rid of the school finance formula and instead block-grant to school districts virtually the same amount of money each got this year, but make them pay for a part of their employees’ pensions.

What’s that come down to? Forcing those school districts which many legislators believe are spendthrifts to economize, including cutting administration, cooperating with other districts for things like payroll, information technology and such, to make sure they have enough money for teachers—that “in the classroom” we keep hearing about.

It’s those economies Brownback is looking for. Fire an associate district superintendent and hire two classroom teachers? Probably fine with Brownback and probably a majority of legislators.

Practically, it’s probably possible for school districts for the upcoming budget year to pare some administrative expenses, divert those savings to teachers and get along OK, but probably with a few less Audis parked in the administrative sections of school district parking lots.

But the following year—and remember, Brownback issued a two-year budget last week—things will get tighter and there may be some school district property tax increases proposed. Districts with enrollment growth, or growth in student populations with special needs which under the current finance formula carry a “weighting” or additional state support, well, that’s where it gets tricky.

It also becomes a test for the folks who run the school districts—seeing what they will cut local spending on to make sure that students never feel the effect of the tightened budget. A few more kids in a classroom, probably OK, but nobody wants a third-grader’s class to look like a college freshman political science class with more than a hundred kids in it. At the K-12 school level, we want teachers to know the students’ names, not just their place on a seating chart.

There is budget cutting, and then there is budget-cutting. Done smartly, dollars are saved and nobody besides bookkeepers notice it. Done smartly, too, budget cuts can be made that will draw the attention of district patrons/voters and cause an uproar that will be felt at the next election. Say, eliminate debate or art, or have Friday night football become a non-contact sport.

Somewhere, of course, there’s that constitutional requirement that the state make provision for suitable education of children, and the decision of what is suitable—we’re talking state financing here—becomes an issue. But, remember, the Legislature and the courts have adopted new standards for “suitable” and nobody’s sure how to measure students against those standards.

Interesting tactical/philosophical/budget battle ahead. Brownback scores first, voters hopefully start paying attention now, to decide whether in 2016 he gets a legislature that supports him or whether he starts brewing coffee by the cup, not the pot…

Syndicated by Hawver News Co. of Topeka, Martin Hawver is publisher of Hawver’s Capitol Report. To learn more about this nonpartisan statewide political news service, visit www.hawvernews.com.

REVIEW: ‘American Sniper’ hits its mark

James Gerstner reviews movies for Hays Post.
James Gerstner reviews movies for Hays Post.

War takes many forms. Not all heroes, villains and battlefields are created equal. This week I had the pleasure of seeing two films that painted very different pictures of what it means to take, or save, a life and the harrowing costs of doing so.

“American Sniper” tells a tale inspired by the real heroics of Navy SEAL marksman Chris Kyle who is credited as the most lethal sniper in US history. Bradley Cooper delivers a powerful performance that is a worthy tribute to a man who was called “Legend” by his fellow soldiers.

The film is at its best when it’s asking the question – who is the enemy? The world isn’t black and white – titanically less so for a Navy SEAL deciding who lives and who dies in a war against a collection of radical ideas. Director Clint Eastwood builds the surrounding tension with precision and lets the audience experience it through Cooper’s heart-pounding performance.

This is a film that sticks with you. Chris Kyle’s story is recent history, not all that long ago it wasn’t even history, it was still news. A story like this, one which is so near, is still being examined under a microscope rather than in broad strokes. As a result, pieces of this film feel unsatisfying, largely by design and partially due to the nature of the story.

All in all, “American Sniper” is a chilling look at the price tag of greatness. Everything is well produced, there’s tension and power aplenty and it’s certainly not for nothing. That said, there are some editing and general structure choices that kept “American Sniper” from its fullest potential. Nevertheless, I imagine that this film, more than most films in recent history, will affect audiences very differently. I think everyone can appreciate the power of this story, but the final message is both open to interpretation and hasn’t been completely written yet.

5 of 6 stars

Waymaster reacts to State of the State address

troy waymaster

On Thursday evening, January 15, 2015, Governor Sam Brownback addressed the Senate and the House for his annual State of the State Address which outlined his proposals to address the needs of the state. The main issue during the past election and last couple of months have been the projected shortfalls that the state is currently facing for fiscal years 2015 and 2016.

Governor Brownback began his fifth State of the State Address by stating the purpose of government is to serve the people. He then outlined his vision for the state of Kansas stating that he is proposing a two-year balanced budget. He also said he is going to continue the march to zero percent income taxes.

Governor Brownback also outlined some proposed changes to the Kansas State Constitution. One of those, proposed back in his State of State Address in 2013, is a change to the selection process for the Kansas Supreme Court where the governor nominates and confirmation is conducted by the Senate. The Governor also mentioned that we need to change the current method of local elections by moving those from April to November.

Another proposal mentioned by the Governor was altering the current school finance formula to a new formula. This would be achieved by supplying funds to our schools in the form of block grants for two years, during which a new school finance formula would be developed. He also reiterated that the power of appropriating funds is the sole responsibility of the Legislature and not any other branch of government.

Price of Oil and Severance Taxes

The lower oil prices are not only affecting those within the oil business around the 109th district, they are also having a direct impact on the amount of revenue that the state of Kansas receives for the severance tax, which is a tax that is incurred on natural resources. During a briefing of our Appropriations committee on Tuesday, Legislative Research indicated that the amount of money received for severance taxes will decrease significantly due to the current oil prices. In November, when Legislative Research performed their last analysis on the tax receipts for the state, oil prices were still hovering around $80 a barrel. During our committee, Research did explain that the state would need to account for less revenue since the current oil price is considerably lower. If this low price continues, our area and the finances of the state will be greatly affected.

Kansas Water Vision
In the fall of 2013, Governor Sam Brownback began the Kansas Water Vision in order to develop a plan for the viability of the water needs for the state of Kansas. For the Kansas Water Vision, he composed a team of representatives from the Kansas Water Office and the Kansas Department of Agriculture. This team has conducted more than 350 meetings and has met with more than 13,000 Kansans since December of 2013 to draft a long-term vision.

Since water is such a vital commodity for our state, the Kansas Water Vision is moving forward in 2015. Below are some of the next steps in their timeline:

Winter 2015-Orientation will be provided in February to each of the Regional Goal Setting Leadership teams, and they will outline their process, their expectations, and share information about the water resource conditions in their regions. During this time, a minimum of one public outreach event will be conducted in each planning area.

Spring 2015-The Regional Goal Setting Leadership Team members will review the feedback that they received during the public events and develop first draft goals for their regions. They will then present the draft of those proposed regional goals to the Kansas Water Office.

Summer 2015-All the regional draft goals and advice from the Kansas Water Office will be posted online for public comment in June and July. The Kansas Water Office will review that feedback in August.

Fall 2015/Winter 2016-The finalized regional goals will be incorporated into the Kansas Water Vision and presented to Governor Brownback and the Kansas Legislature.

Legislative Committee Assignments
In December 2014, the Speaker of the House, Ray Merrick, selected committees for the members of the House of Representatives. The committees that I have been appointed to serve on during the next two legislative sessions are: House Appropriations Committee, General Government Budget Committee, and Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee. I was chosen by the speaker to serve as chairman of the General Government Budget Committee. This particular committee reviews twenty seven budgets, then those budgets are presented to the House Appropriations Committee.
Even though it was the first week of the Legislative Session, I was pleased to have many visitors in my office this week. Some of those that visited my office were Dr. Carl Heilman from Barton County Community College, Jeannine Byers-Long from Russell, and David Auble from Paradise.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact my office at (785) 296-7672, visit www.troywaymaster.com or email me at [email protected].

It is an honor to serve the 109th Kansas House District and the state of Kansas. Do not hesitate to contact me with your thoughts, concerns and questions. I appreciate hearing from the residents of the 109th House District and others from the state of Kansas.

EXPLORING KAN. OUTDOORS: Humane Society of the U.S.

Steve Gilliland
Steve Gilliland

As a hunter, fisherman and trapper, I know that the Humane Society of the United States is a very powerful, wealthy, politically active animal rights organization that opposes any use of animals, period, and especially hunting, trapping and even fishing.

For some time, I’ve been dismayed as to how the wonderful people at our local animal shelters could be part of a group like that. The short answer here is that THEY ARE NOT! Local animal shelters are often known as Humane Societies and are wonderful groups of dedicated animal lovers who run shelters like the ones where we have gotten two of our dogs, and often give their time for little or no pay. The confusion comes from the fact that local Humane Societies and the HSUS are two totally different organizations using the same name. The following information comes from a recent issue of the trapping magazine Trappers Post.

In 1887, the American Humane Association was formed as “the nation’s voice for the protection of children and animals” and was instrumental in every major advance in helping protect children, pets and farm animals from neglect and abuse, including federal regulations for humane livestock slaughter. The AHA is an animal welfare organization, meaning they advocate humane treatment of animals. The HSUS on the other hand is an animal rights organization which believes killing animals in any way, shape or form is murder.

In the early 1950’s some AHA people realized that vast amounts of money could be raised by appealing to peoples’ emotion and asking them to help animals. That group eventually named itself the Humane Society of the United States and split from the AHA to concentrate mostly on fund raising and in 1980 formally adopted an animal rights position. They have since perfected the art of fund raising and today they raise well over $100 million annually. However only a mere fraction of that goes to help animals, and they do not run one single animal shelter. Most of the money lines the pockets of HSUS staff or is spent on more fund raising and on efforts to ban hunting, fishing and trapping.

A watchdog group called Humane Watch (www.humanewatch.org) has provided the following figures from HSUS’s 2013 tax return.

• 2013 fundraising expenses: 42 million, 35% of their budget
• CEO Wayne Pacelle’s 2013 compensation: over $400,000
• In 2013, HSUS reported 5 million in lobbying expenses alone.
• In 2013, HSUS paid out 44.3 million in salaries and compensation
• Also in 2013, HSUS paid over 15 million to settle a federal racketeering lawsuit naming them and two of their employees
• In 2013, HSUS spent less than 1% of their annual 120 million budget to aid animal shelters

Hunters, fishermen and trappers, please be aware that the Humane Society of the United States and local Humane Societies are two completely different organizations. Many people make contributions to HSUS thinking they are helping their local animal shelters, when in fact they are just being ripped off by giving more money to an enormous fund raising machine that cares little about animals and whose agenda is raising millions of dollars to spend on efforts to ban hunting, fishing and trapping.

Please continue to support your local animal shelters and Humane Societies, but please do not contribute to the Humane Society of the United States and lets all help educate the public on the difference between the two. Continue to Explore Kansas Outdoors.

Steve Gilliland, Inman, can be contacted by email at [email protected].

Health risks from radon are preventable

Linda Beech
Linda Beech

There’s a saying: “What you don’t know can’t hurt you…”

Whether you agree or disagree, K-State Research and Extension is urging property owners to test for radon during National Radon Awareness Month in January.  Radon is a naturally occurring element produced from radioactive decay in the soil.  The odorless, colorless and tasteless gas is the leading cause of lung cancer in non- smokers, and the second leading cause of lung cancer in the general population.

National radon surveys have shown that 6 percent of homes in the U.S. have average concentrations above the recommended maximum level. However, the Kansas survey showed that one in four homes were high, according to Brian Hanson, coordinator of the Kansas Radon Program at Kansas State University Research and Extension.

“Anyone can be vulnerable,” said Hanson, who explained that the cancer-causing gas seeps from the soil beneath the home through cracks or joints in the foundation.  The good news is that it is typically easy to detect and mitigate radon at a moderate cost.

Detection is relatively simple. Consumers are advised to start with a home radon test kit, which can be purchased from the Ellis County Extension Office for $5.50.  Other counties may have slightly different prices; other models may be available at home and hardware stores and on the Internet, usually for $25 or less.

Testing is important, because it’s the only way to tell how much of the gas is present. Conduct tests in the home in the lowest lived-in level (such as a basement or main floor bedroom, living room or family room) about 20 to 24 inches above the floor for two to five days. Testing is most accurate during the winter months when the house is closed up and ventilation is at a minimum. The goal is to measure the potential for elevated radon concentrations that come from the soil beneath the home’s foundation.

Testing in a kitchen or bathroom, in which more humid air and ventilation is typically occurring, is not recommended.  It is vital to follow test kit instructions carefully for most accurate results.

If the initial test result is high, a follow-up test with a more sensitive long-term detector is recommended. If the initial result is low, further testing would be advised if living patterns change, if you begin occupying a lower level, or a significant change occurs in the foundation, heating/cooling systems or insulation/air sealing features.

If radon modification is needed, hiring a professional contractor to fix your home is recommended.  Lists of certified radon measurement and mitigation contractors are available at the Kansas Radon Program website at www.kansasradonprogram.org/contractors.

In Kansas, since July 1, 2009, residential real estate contracts must contain a specific paragraph recommending radon testing in real estate transactions and disclosure of test results. There are, however, currently no laws requiring such tests or mitigation of high levels of radon, if found.

Radon awareness is recommended for everyone, said Hanson, who noted that an inexpensive test may be all it takes to spare you or a loved one from lung cancer. To purchase a radon test kit for your home, stop by the Ellis County Extension Office at 601 Main Street, Suite A, in downtown Hays, or your own local county Extension office.

More information about radon is available at Extension offices throughout the state, online at www.kansasradonprogram.org and by calling the Kansas Radon Program at 1-800-693-5343.

Linda K. Beech is Ellis County Extension Agent for Family and Consumer Sciences.

Brownback’s ‘sin tax’ plan hurts middle class, poor

On Friday’s Jan. 16 KSN -TV evening news, a reporter mentioned that Governor Brownback was going to raise the state cigarette tax from 79 cents a pack to $2.29.  Also, on Saturday morning, the Salina Journal has a front-page story on this same issue.  This is Sam Brownback’s way of getting out of the deficit hole that he created.

This action shows an “attitude” problem that the governor has.  First, he greatly reduces the income taxes that his rich cronies would have paid, then he puts an enormous tax on the middle class and the poor who smoke cigarettes.  His rich friends can afford to continue buying their cigarettes.  The middle class and the poor cannot.  For example, a basic cartoon of cigarettes like, Pall Mall, now costs about $36, but with the new tax this same cartoon will cost about $60.   Most smokers smoke a pack or more per day.  It’s quite conceivable that they will need to buy four cartoons a month having to spend an additional $24 X 4 or $96 per month.  That’s a lot of money for a middle class family or a poor family.  If Sam Brownback could just snap his fingers and all the smokers could quit now that would be a success story.  But Brownback has no such power.  But Brownback has the power to hurt the middle class and the poor by enacting taxes.

i am a conservative.  i met Governor Sam Brownback at the annual GOP picnic in Logan, Kansas where both of us briefly spoke to the audience.  He talked like a conservative.  i believe he even said that he would not raise any taxes.  But I have forgotten that Brownback is from the Washington group of politicians who promise one thing and do the opposite.  That folks is deception of the American people and that is the Washington way of doing business which our governor has learned.  Folks, I urge you to read the book, “Bombing America, the Deception of the American People”  which explains how we can get our country back on the right path.

Our middle class and the poor are taking the biggest hit from Washington and now from our state. In 20 years we may not have a middle class any longer which will result in only the rich and the poor.  The end result will be the demise of America.

Roger Ewing, Hays

INSIGHT KANSAS: Spending’s not the culprit for Kansas budget woes

Look back 30 years. What did it cost to purchase a car? Eggs? Electricity? Blue jeans? A house? Certainly less than today. Most of us know instinctively that prices will likely be quite a bit higher 30 years in the future. Although Americans are currently enjoying a reprieve in the cost of a gallon of gas, we would be fooling ourselves to believe the price will never again rise above two dollars.

Duane Goossen
Duane Goossen is a Senior Fellow at the Kansas Center for Economic Growth and formerly served 12 years as Kansas Budget Director.

 

State government services and programs are no different. Over time, state spending goes up. That’s normal. Inflation pushes routine expenses higher. Populations grow, requiring more services. Greater numbers of students show up at school. The ever-rising price of healthcare drives a steady increase in Medicaid costs.

The National Association of State Budget Officers tracks spending across all states. Over the past 30 years, the average 50-state general fund spending increase has been right at five percent a year. How does Kansas compare to the rest? A little below the average. The “normal” budget increase for Kansas over that 30-year period has been 4.85 percent. Recently, in the wake of the Great Recession, spending by states has moderated somewhat—4 percent annual average growth nationally in the last four years, 3.3 percent in Kansas.

While spending patterns in Kansas have been mainstream, Kansas has deviated sharply from the norm on revenue collections.

Last year, Kansas income tax collections dropped 25 percent as a result of the Brownback tax policy. No other state experienced anything like that. In most states, revenue collections grew. That’s normal. But Kansas revenue fell dramatically.

Kansas has been left with a financial predicament in which general fund expenses are about $6.4 billion and rising, while revenue has fallen below $5.8 billion. With even more income tax rate reductions scheduled to kick in, it’s unlikely that revenue will grow much. That situation cannot go on for long.

So far, lawmakers have bridged the difference by spending down the general fund bank balance, but now, those funds have been depleted. Most states have a “rainy day fund” from which to draw in emergencies, but not Kansas. The time of hard decisions has arrived.

Some legislators will attempt to cut spending to fit the emaciated revenue stream. But resetting expenses to some lower level carries very real consequences. Kansas courts have ruled that schools already receive unconstitutionally inadequate funding. Further cuts will hurt classrooms and kids. Reducing stretched human service programs affects the most vulnerable Kansans. Less highway maintenance means more potholes.

Alternatively, lawmakers could choose to address the root of the budget problem. Revenue has been set unrealistically low. Lawmakers have failed to provide enough income to cover regular expenses, let alone pay to bring school funding back up to an adequate level. Options to correct this include stopping the next round of tax cuts, adjusting the business tax exemption, and rethinking income tax rates.

What will it be? Will the decision-makers put all their time and energy into downsizing schools, highway maintenance, and public safety programs, or will they make a realistic assessment of what it costs to pay for key services and figure out a fair way to fund that? The Kansas legislative session has begun. Our lawmakers are choosing for us now.

Duane Goossen is a Senior Fellow at the Kansas Center for Economic Growth and formerly served 12 years as Kansas Budget Director.

Copyright Eagle Radio | FCC Public Files | EEO Public File