We have a brand new updated website! Click here to check it out!

INSIGHT KANSAS: The most important election in your lifetime

Do elections matter? The short answer is an emphatic “Yes,” even though it’s easy to be cynical and disillusioned.

In 1974, state senate president Robert Bennett, a moderate Republican, came from far behind to edge attorney general Vern Miller, a relatively conservative Democrat.

LoomisBurdett2008
Burdett Loomis is a professor of political science at the University of Kansas.

The differences were clear between Bennett, the bearded Johnson County policy wonk and Miller, the flamboyant Wichita lawman.

Bennett was known for meticulously examining the state budget, line by line. Miller’s notoriety stemmed from his hands-on style, popping out of car trunks during drug busts.

Miller’s substantial lead eroded, partly because of his continued presence in drug raids, an unseemly activity for a prospective governor. Bennett, a famously reluctant campaigner, did enough to win by 3000 votes in a photo finish. Over the next four years he completed the extensive reforms of Kansas government he had begun as a state senator.

Those modernizing reforms set Kansas on a course of almost forty years of successful moderate-conservative government, which came to a crashing end with the 2010 electoral successes of Sam Brownback and a wave of far-right state house members.

Bob Bennett’s election was crucial in developing a balanced tax system and a responsive state government. To be sure, Kansas politicians have fought over many issues, from abortion to KPERS funding to school finance, but the pivotal 1974 election set the overall direction of policy-making.

In 2014, Kansas voters are faced with an even more important choice than in 1974, when moderate legislators would have eventually worked with Miller to produce essential reforms.

Simply put, the future of Kansas is at stake in this year’s gubernatorial contest. Both Sam Brownback and his Democratic opponent, Paul Davis would probably agree with that statement, as would their supporters and most close political observers around the state.

The race’s outlines are familiar. Brownback and the Legislature engaged in a self-proclaimed experiment by enacting major income tax cuts, which reduced taxes substantially for the wealthiest Kansans and eliminated them for an entire class of businesses (more than 191,000). In addition, the governor rejected hundreds of millions in federal money that would have helped Kansans gain access to health care. Per pupil state aid to education has fallen, and teachers have lost the right of due process in fighting dismissals.

There is more, to be sure, but the crucial elements here are the sharp tax cuts, unevenly spread between rich and poor, the resulting steep reductions in revenues, the ensuing bond-rating downgrades, and the prospect of even further large cuts to education spending, from kindergarten through graduate school.

In a nutshell, this election is a referendum on that record and whether a far-right administration will continue these policies.

In assessing the future under a Brownback regime, former state legislator and budget director Duane Goossen concludes that the state has “no plan that even pretends to show how the experiment might succeed. No spreadsheet that outlines details. No timeline. No metrics for what would constitute success or failure.” Rather, as I’ve previously argued, we have a faith-based budget – faith in policies that have failed elsewhere and that other states view with alarm.

Over the course of the campaign, Paul Davis has demonstrated continued competence, in building a campaign organization, raising funds, and providing consistent evidence in debates that he is fully capable of governing.

Given that, the choice in just over two weeks is whether Kansas voters want more of a failed, experimental, unsound set of policies or whether they want to return to the balanced approach that Robert Bennett and a bipartisan group of talented legislators produced, forty years ago.

Burdett Loomis is a professor of political science at the University of Kansas.

Now That’s Rural: Carl Reed, Tallgrass Express

By RON WILSON
Huck Boyd National Institute for Rural Development

From bluegrass to tallgrass. No, I’m not talking about converting your lawn. I’m referring to the progression of a singer, songwriter and musician who is part of an effort that is celebrating the Kansas Flint Hills.

Last week, we learned about Annie Wilson of Tallgrass Express String Band. Today we’ll meet her fellow lead vocalist in the band, the talented Carl Reed of Manhattan.

Ron Wilson is director of the Huck Boyd National Institute for Rural Development at Kansas State University.
Ron Wilson is director of the Huck Boyd National Institute for Rural Development at Kansas State University.

Carl grew up in Michigan and studied agriculture at Michigan State. His family was musical.  “We did music all the time,” Carl said.

After college, Carl volunteered for the Peace Corps and was assigned to a grain laboratory in Costa Rica. While working there, two things happened: One, he met a visiting delegation of grain science specialists from Kansas State University, and two, he bought a guitar. The guitar was for his own pleasure and enjoyment. But when his two-year assignment was up and he was looking for a job, he thought of Kansas State.

Dr. Charles Deyoe was the head of K-State’s Grain Science Department, which was ramping up its international work at the time and which had sent the delegation to Costa Rica. Carl wrote to Dr. Deyoe to express interest in a job, and he was ultimately hired onto the K-State Grain Science faculty where he worked in international grain programs for nearly 30 years.

After retiring, he launched a grain scouting business in the rural community of Buhler, population 1,344 people. That’s rural – but there’s more.

Meanwhile, Carl continued to play the guitar. He got into bluegrass music, bought a stand-up bass, and started writing songs.

“I had tunes buzzing around in my head,” Carl said. “I got involved with a songwriters’ association out of Nashville which helps writers get started.” His songs have now been performed by such groups as Continental Divide and Special Consensus.

Carl enjoyed the music, but when he saw Annie Wilson perform, he saw something more. It wasn’t so much a love of being on stage as much as it was a love of the Kansas Flint Hills which she was promoting through her music.

“When I saw what Annie was doing, I knew I really wanted to support this,” Carl said. “She’s trying to promote the authentic Flint Hills experience.”

In 2009, Carl joined Annie’s band, the Tallgrass Express String Band, doing lead vocals and harmony.

“He is an amazing songwriter,” Annie Wilson said. “In addition to being a great musician, he is our Kansas historian.”

In 2010, with Carl Reed as one of its members, the Tallgrass Express String Band produced a CD of 16 original Flint Hills songs.

In 2014, the band produced a two-CD set featuring 30 songs, including five by Carl. These include Kansas Song about the state’s culture and climate; Song of Samuel Wood, a Kansas leader of the Underground Railroad and father of Chase County; Little Ol’ Life, a song about the simple joys; and Freedom Must Prevail, a spirited ballad about the abolitionist movement in Kansas. It describes the history and construction of the Beecher Bible and Rifle Church in Wabaunsee.

His fifth song is the one he calls his favorite. It is a haunting tune based on a true story about long-lost love letters which were found when an elderly lady passed away. The song is titled Letters of Long Ago. The lady lived in Paxico, population 210 people.  Now, that’s rural.

In September 2013 at Cottonwood Falls, the band held a debut party to celebrate the new two-CD set which is titled Sky & Water, Wind & Grass. “It was a smashing success,” Carl said. “The place was jam-packed.”

For more information, go to www.tallgrassexpress.com.

From bluegrass to tallgrass. No, this doesn’t refer to your lawn. It describes the progression of this musician from playing bluegrass to being part of a band which promotes the tallgrass prairie of the Kansas Flint Hills. We salute Carl Reed, Annie Wilson, and the other members of the Tallgrass Express String Band for making a difference with their talents. Whether bluegrass or tallgrass, they are making beautiful music together.

DAVE SAYS: Loaning money to friends

Dear Dave,
I loaned some money to a good friend recently. He’s going to help me with a job I’m working on, so do you think I should pay him for the work or just forgive the debt instead?
Charlie

Dave Ramsey
Dave Ramsey

Dear Charlie,
The big question is whether or not you’ve already agreed to pay him for the work. Another is how he views the situation. In his mind, he may just be helping a friend and looking at it as he still owes you the money.

If you don’t already have an agreement, my advice would be to ask him what his expectations are. Just talk to him, find out what he’s thinking and figure out what seems fair to you both. The big thing at this point is that you’re on the same page. If you have already agreed on a certain amount, and the value of the work is pretty close to the amount you loaned him, you might talk to him about the possibility of knocking out the debt that way. He could work off the debt while helping you on this project.

There’s really no right or wrong answer to this question, Charlie. However, I would recommend not loaning money to friends or family in the future. Sometimes things work out and everyone’s happy. But in most cases it changes the dynamics of the relationship. The Bible says that the borrower is a slave to the lender, and there’s a lot of truth to that statement financially and emotionally.

I’ve seen situations like this go bad and even ruin friendships. It sounds like you two are good buddies and have a great bond, but if someone close to you really needs help, and you’re not enabling bad financial behavior in the process, just make the money a gift. Sooner or later this kind of thing will mess up a relationship.
—Dave

Dave Ramsey is America’s trusted voice on money and business. He has authored five New York Times best-selling books: Financial Peace, More Than Enough, The Total Money Makeover, EntreLeadership and Smart Money Smart Kids. The Dave Ramsey Show is heard by more than 8 million listeners each week on more than 500 radio stations. Follow Dave on Twitter at @DaveRamsey and on the web at daveramsey.com.

Want leadership? Vote and urge friends and family to do the same

John Schlageck writes for the Kansas Farm Bureau.
John Schlageck writes for the Kansas Farm Bureau.

As the 2014 election races toward the finish line on Nov.4, candidates from both parties have stooped to their old tricks of slinging mud, name calling and finger pointing at one another. Why can’t candidates do what’s right for this nation and focus on issues?

Instead we are forced to put up with elected officials who grow the government, do-nothing and engage in gridlock.

What Kansas and this nation sorely needs is leadership and a willingness among all elected officials to work together for the good of this country.

What do you think the framers of our constitution and this republic would say about what’s going on in all three branches of government today?

What would Washington, Hamilton and Jefferson think about our way of conducting the nation’s business?

What would Kansas’s own favorite son, Dwight D. Eisenhower say about the way we’re conducting this state and country’s business today?

What would Ike, Alf Landon, Andy Schoeppel and other Kansas leaders of yesteryear think?

Profound?

Enlightening?

Telling?

Where are the ideas for leading this great state and nation?

Isn’t that what they’re supposed to be doing?

Farmers, ranchers and businessmen cannot, and do not want to engage in the same game of blaming one party for the charade going on in Washington and among some of our own state leaders. This is a shared shame and a weakness that is ruining our state and nation.

In spite of claims to the contrary, taxes continue to increase. The only way for the tax-and-spend cycle to be broken is to hold candidates accountable. The citizenry of Kansas and this country must demand candidates clearly state their positions on the issues.

Today’s politicians and the majority of the candidates have become so adept at ducking the issues. They rival a young Muhammad Ali’s ability to float like a butterfly, always out of reach and accountability.

Not only do voters rarely have a chance to ask candidates questions, they have even less chance of receiving a worthwhile answer.

Some candidates also talk out of both sides of their mouth. They tell one gathering of voters one thing and others just the opposite.

They also barrage voters with wave after wave of rhetoric, hoping to obscure their real views. They’re not called politicians for nothing.

At the end of the day, this year’s election is just around the corner. Whether we like what’s been happening in government or not, the mess we’re in remains our own.

It’s our system, and while it may appear broken, we still must vote. Past elections demonstrate rural voters can make a difference by their willingness to go to the polls.

Fiscal responsibility, a reduction in the size of government and increased productivity remain a sound prescription for this country’s economic troubles. The bigger problem of cooperation and compromise while working together for the good of this country must be addressed as well if these remedies are to work.

Urge your friends, family and neighbors to cast their votes Nov. 4

John Schlageck, a Hoxie native, is a leading commentator on agriculture and rural Kansas.

Kansas Water Vision: Development of the second draft

water vision 50 years logo

Dear Kansans,

Nearly a year ago, in recognition of the critical importance water serves in our state, Gov. Sam Brownback challenged the Kansas Water Office and Kansas Department of Agriculture to develop a 50 year vision for our water supply. His message was clear we needed to get out across the state and listen to stakeholders, and we did just that. We have visited with more than 12,000 Kansans, attended more than 250 meetings and now are preparing to release the Kansas Water Vision at the Governor’s Water Conference early next month.

As we prepare for the conference, the focus is now on the development of the second draft of The Vision for the Future of Water in Kansas. It is important for Kansans to be updated on the process and to have an opportunity for feedback. The feedback we’ve received on the Preliminary Discussion Draft release in July has been phenomenal. As a result of the input we’ve received, we are planning a number of revisions. A preview of some of those changes includes:

• In the Preliminary Discussion Draft, examples of statewide and regional goals were included as means of generating discussion. Did they ever! As most know, our water resources are diverse across the state and the goals we strive to meet must be diverse as well, and applicable to the water resource conditions of the area. As a result, we will be including a goal setting process in the second draft to replace the existing examples. We will enlist the help of the Kansas Water Authority in developing regional water resources goals, working in concert with stakeholders. The Vision and Mission will remain statewide in nature, but the goals will be regional.

• While some aspects of the Kansas Water Appropriation Act may be considered for change through the normal legislative and regulatory processes, the evaluation of the pros and cons of
priority under the Kansas Water Appropriation Act will be eliminated. We’ve heard from many stakeholders regarding this strategy who are very concerned with the potential implications of modifying the fundamental premise of the Act. We feel that any change in the Act as it pertains to the “first in time, first in right” provisions will achieve little and divert attention away from the dozens of strategies in the Draft that are widely supported by Kansans.

• We understand you can’t discuss water quantity without recognizing the importance of water quality. One example of where quantity and quality overlap is in our watersheds. The adoption of watershed best management practices continues to receive overwhelming support as the most cost effective means of preventing sediment from entering our reservoirs. The second Draft will encourage the implementation of more projects aimed at reducing nutrients and sediments from entering our targeted water courses and reservoirs.

• The priority in the second Draft will remain on voluntary, locally driven and market-based solutions. We continue to hear and recognize that locally developed plans have the highest opportunity for long-term success. The state should provide the necessary tools and support to allow greater flexibility for the management of water resources at the local level. The Vision Team also continues to hear a local desire to conserve and extend the life of their aquifer. Local landowners and water right holders have the right and responsibility to determine their destiny with respect to long-term water use while balancing conservation and economic growth.

Your input on the next Draft is critical and the deadline of Oct. 15 is fast approaching. If you have not registered for the Governor’s Water Conference, there’s still time. The conference will be held November 12 and 13 at the Hilton Garden Inn in Manhattan. Please register by going to the Kansas Water Office website at www.kwo.org.

We truly appreciate the effort and commitment by those Kansans who have participated in the Kansas Water Vision process. We look forward to continued discussions as we finalize the next Draft and ultimately all work together to implement the Vision.

Tracy Streeter, Kansas Water Office director
Jackie McClaskey, Kansas Department of Agriculture secretary

MOVIE REVIEW: ‘The Judge’ bends and breaks

James Gerstner reviews movies for Hays Post.
James Gerstner reviews movies for Hays Post.

I found it very difficult to judge “The Judge.” Perhaps more than than any film in recent memory, “The Judge” flirts with the line between good cinema and bad cinema, between right and wrong.

The premise is tried, tired and true and the writing is, at times, excruciatingly unimaginative. Just about every “big city lawyer comes home to his rural hometown” trope is shamelessly present. Not only are the poor writing choices glaring obvious, they are executed with such gusto that they occasionally work, which is confusing, and are occasionally abysmal.

Robert Downy Jr. and Robert Duvall lead an impressive and talented cast. The actors commitment to this story is evident, and comes through in their performances. A committed actor will almost always deliver a better performance than someone who is phoning it it; however, commitment to a project that is as unsteady as “The Judge” occasionally has greats like Downy Jr. and, to a lesser degree, Duvall taking shots that hit nothing but air.

I found it difficult to get overly excited or overly morose about “The Judge.” Every time it felt like the movie was heading down a path that ended in a ravine filled with terrible “Lifetime Channel-esque” dramatic reveals the proverbial bridge would magically complete itself and the film would coast to safety.

That feeling of never knowing when the film might finally topple is perhaps the best description and review that I can make. Despite all of the back and forth, “The Judge” is ultimately a poor film with strong moments as opposed to a good film with weak moments. If taken out of the hands of a subjective reviewer and judged instead by an absolute law, such as gravity, “The Judge” would crumble and, ultimately, fall.

3 of 6 stars

Same-sex marriage issue escalates quickly in Kansas

martin hawver line art

This same-sex marriage business has gotten very complicated and very political very quickly, hasn’t it?

When you sit down and think it through, it’s probably this superior sovereignty business that makes it complicated.

Basically, federal law trumps state law. The U.S. Constitution is the guiding light—no matter what states might want to put into their own cute little constitutions.

That sounds a little demeaning, doesn’t it? No matter what Kansans put into our constitution by a roughly 70 percent to 30 percent vote nine years ago, it’s the federal law, as determined by the U.S. Supreme Court, that is the law of the land, including Kansas. Or…what the 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals whose purview includes Kansas rules if the issue doesn’t rise to the level where the U.S. Supreme Court decides it has to step in to put things right in its view of the nuances of the U.S. Constitution.

That’s what is going to be tested in the next few weeks, maybe before or maybe after the Nov. 4 election: The Kansas constitutional amendment that defines marriage as between a man and a woman and denies any other relationship “rights or incidents of marriage” fits within the U.S. Constitution.

This superior sovereignty…well, depending on the issue before the U.S. Supreme Court or federal district court, is either good or bad to hear the politicians discuss it.

This superior sovereignty probably works out well when it comes to meat inspection. Not many folks mind that federal officials are inspecting those chicken wings which are in interstate commerce and land on plates in Kansas to make sure they are safe to eat for everyone, not just those wings served to soldiers on military bases.

But the contract of marriage, well, that and in Kansas some of that “right to bear arms” 2nd Amendment stuff, is where there is political hay to be made, or lost, in the upcoming election.

Legislators are still looking back at that 70 percent vote for the Kansas constitutional amendment that defined marriage, and puzzling out whether it makes a good bullet point on campaign hand-outs in this election year.

Times have changed. Chances are decent that Kansans still would approve that marriage amendment if it was on the ballot this year. The percentage probably would have been higher at the August primary election than at the upcoming general election next month.

But there was some political thought even way back in 2005, when a voice from your cell phone couldn’t direct you to the nearest Chinese restaurant, that the issue would be…touchy. So, the Legislature decided that the vote on the constitutional amendment would be on the city election ballot in April, not a distraction or an issue for them on the November general election ballot.

Seemed like a little legislative self-preservation at the time, or at least a strategy that wouldn’t let just a slip of the tongue in a debate change an election outcome.

But, it’s probably worth remembering that just a few state constitutional amendments back from the 15th, which is the gay marriage article, Kansas voters decided that all state officers have to take an oath or affirmation to support the constitution of the United States along with the Kansas constitution. So, maybe government leaders will remember the U.S. constitutional piece, leading to a little less acting-out by legislators whichever way the issue is decided this fall, or maybe not.

There are going to be state personnel, health insurance, pension coverage and other areas to be dealt with if the state’s constitutional prohibition of recognizing “rights and incidents of marriage” between same-sex couples is struck down.

Settle in for a complicated legislative session of same-sex marriage politicking next year.

Syndicated by Hawver News Co. of Topeka, Martin Hawver is publisher of Hawver’s Capitol Report. To learn more about this nonpartisan statewide political news service, visit www.hawvernews.com.

‘Money personality’ affects life, relationships

Linda Beech
Linda Beech

James W. Frick, former vice president for development at Notre Dame University, once said, “Don’t tell me what your priorities are. Show me you how you spend your money and I’ll tell you what they are.”

Your habits and attitudes about money can support or sabotage many aspects of your life, career, relationships and financial goals. By discovering your money personality, you can discover why you spend, save and share money the way you do. Understanding how your spouse approaches money can help you improve your marriage relationship as well.

A new program from the Ellis County Extension Office will help you explore your “money habitudes” — your habits and attitudes about money — at noon Friday, Oct. 17 at the Ellis County Extension Office meeting room, 601 Main, Hays. Enter the rear door from the north parking lot; bring a lunch to eat during the meeting if desired.

The class is free but limited to a maximum of 10 people. Register with the Extension by calling (785) 628-9430 — first come, first served.

Not only do decisions about assets and debt have financial consequences, they have consequences on couple relationships, too. Research studies indicate that partner spending behaviors influence relationship satisfaction. Spending without consulting one’s partner decreases marriage satisfaction and creates tensions about money that can contribute to disagreements and divorce.

In a long-term study that followed a group of married couples over six years, debt problems ranked high for overall marital discord. As debt increased, fights over money increased, husbands worked more hours, partners spent less time together and marital satisfaction decreased.

Accumulating assets can ease feelings of financial pressure and decrease conflict in relationships. Paying down consumer debt, such as credit card debt, may decrease conflict in marriage. Paying off or remaining free from consumer debt is linked to increased marital satisfaction.

In short, your money behaviors can directly impact your happiness with your spouse.

George Lorimer, past editor of the Saturday Evening Post, once put it this way, “It’s good to have money and the things that money can buy, but it’s good, too, to check up once in a while and make sure that you haven’t lost the things that money can’t buy.”

Plan to attend the Extension program “Discover Your Money Habitudes” on Oct. 17 to learn about your money personality and how you can use money behaviors to strengthen your marriage and family life. Call to register at (785) 628-9430.

Linda K. Beech is Ellis County Extension Agent for Family and Consumer Sciences.

Here’s a tip: Try paying your housekeepers a living wage

OtherWords columnist Jim Hightower is a radio commentator, writer and public speaker.
OtherWords columnist Jim Hightower is a radio commentator, writer and public speaker.

As an old popular song asks: What do you get if you “work your fingers right down to the bone?” Boney fingers.

As housekeepers in the sprawling Marriott hotel chains know, that’s more than a cute lyric. It’s the truth.

These “room attendants,” as they’re called, are paid barely $8 an hour to perform a very hard, physical job, suffering the highest injury rate among hotel workers. Some two-thirds of them take pain medication just to get through their day of heaving 100-pound mattresses, stooping to clean floors, and twisting to readjust furniture in 15 to 20 rooms per shift.

Yet Marriott President and CEO Arne Sorenson publicly hails the very women he exploits as “the heart of the house,” saying his chain likes to express its appreciation to them with “special recognition events” during International Housekeepers Week.

Yes, exploited room attendants are not rewarded with a living wage, but with a congratulatory week — how great is that?

This year, housekeeper week came with “a new tipping initiative” — a scheme created by multimillionaire Maria Shriver — urging Marriott’s customers “to express their gratitude by leaving tips and notes of thanks for hotel room attendants.” Shriver says she hopes the voluntary tips “will make these women feel seen and validated.” Is that sweet or what?

Does she at least urge that this tip be the standard 15-20 percent we give at restaurants? No. Tipping between one and five bucks per night’s stay is recommended. Let’s see: At about $250 a day for a Marriott room, even $5 is a sad 2 percent expression of “gratitude.”

As for customers leaving a little thank-you note, imagine trying to buy a baloney sandwich with that.

How about this: Instead of paying Sorenson $9 million a year, make the Marriott CEO rely on customer tips — and see how validated he feels.

OtherWords.org columnist Jim Hightower is a radio commentator, writer and public speaker.

From Hong Kong to Colorado, teenagers ‘make some noise’ (UPDATE)

Charles C. Haynes is director of the Religious Freedom Center of the Newseum Institute.
Charles C. Haynes is director of the Religious Freedom Center of the Newseum Institute.

This week 17-year-old Malala Yousafzai of Pakistan became the youngest person ever to receive the Noble Peace Prize.

A leading advocate for girls’ education, Yousafzai first came to the world’s attention after the Taliban shot her in the head two years ago. Since recovering from her wounds, she has organized a worldwide campaign for the rights of young people.

Yousafzai shares the prize with India’s Kailash Satyarthi, a longtime leader in the struggle against the exploitation of children.

The Peace Prize announcement comes in the same week when other 17-year-olds in the Chinese city of Hong Kong and the Denver suburbs of Colorado have taken to the streets — standing up for their principles and ideals.

The two protest movements are, of course, quite different in scale and degree of risk. Students in Hong Kong face arrest and repression, while students in Colorado will get, at most, a slap on the wrist.

But both street demonstrations are a reminder that civil disobedience is an essential instrument in the toolbox of democracy. And both are a reminder that revolutions — big and small — are often sparked by the very young.

Only 17, Joshua Wong has become the face of the pro-democracy movement in Hong Kong, a movement largely inspired and led by students in a city controlled by one of the world’s most repressive regimes.

Over the past two weeks, Wong has been arrested, labeled an extremist and derided as a buffoon by Hong Kong officials and Chinese media. But Wong isn’t backing down.

“The short-term burden on our daily life,” Wong told reporters this week, “is to achieve long term reform.”

Government leaders called off talks scheduled for this week. But with pro-democracy forces vowing to continue civil disobedience, pressure mounts for the government to sit down with the “buffoon” and other student leaders.

Whatever the immediate outcome of the demonstrations, pro-democracy students have already succeeded in galvanizing a new generation of political activists.

On a much smaller stage, high school students in Jefferson County, Colorado also marched and rallied in recent weeks to protest proposed changes to the history curriculum — changes the students believe would present a false picture of American democracy.

School board members favoring curriculum revisions argue that the current Advanced Placement American history course isn’t “patriotic” enough. Among other things, they seek to eliminate lessons that “encourage or condone civil disorder” in favor of a more positive view of America.

In an act of civil disobedience — perhaps inspired by the offending AP class — hundreds of students staged walkouts and organized demonstrations to oppose the proposed changes.

Speaking at a rally last week, 17-year-old student Sarena Phu reminded the crowd that most great social changes in American history — from women’s suffrage to civil rights — were accomplished through protest and civil disobedience. She and other student speakers warned against whitewashing America’s story to eliminate or downplay struggles against injustice and discrimination.

The Colorado students have also been heard. Last week, the school board backed away from language calling for more “patriotic” lessons, appointing a curriculum review committee that will include students and teachers. Students remain skeptical about the motives of the school board, vowing to keep working to prevent the district from sanitizing history.

Joshua Wong knows first-hand the power of education to control minds and hearts with government-imposed definitions of patriotism.

Wong actually got his start as an activist for democracy in 2012 by organizing protests against a curriculum on “moral and national education” mandated by Beijing in the schools of Hong Kong. A key aim of the curriculum is to instill commitment to China in the citizens of Hong Kong with lessons that extoll the Chinese Communist Party as “an advanced, selfless and united ruling group.”

At a time when many American schools are increasingly afraid of freedom — censoring student speech, shutting down school newspapers, ignoring religious liberty rights — teenagers like Malala Yousafzai, Joshua Wong and Sarena Phu are timely reminders of the power of student voice.

Far from being a menace that governments need to control, students who dare to speak up for their convictions are our best hope for changing what is wrong and unjust in this society and in societies around the world.

To other teenagers out there who see injustice but think they’re too young and powerless to make a difference, I offer the advice of civil rights icon John Lewis — who was a teenager himself when he started sitting in at lunch counters to end discrimination.

“Find a way to get in the way,” said Lewis in a recent talk at the Aspen Institute. “Find a way to get in trouble, good trouble, necessary trouble. Be prepared to speak up and speak out, be courageous. When you see something that’s not right, not fair, not just, you have a moral obligation to get in the way and make some noise.”

Charles C. Haynes is director of the Religious Freedom Center of the Washington-based Newseum Institute. [email protected]

DAVE SAYS: Rehabbing to sell

Dear Dave,
My husband and I recently inherited my parents’ home. It’s in a small, rural town with little industry, and we’ve been told that the place would be worth $85,000 if it’s cleaned up, compared to $75,000 as-is.

Should we spend about $10,000 to really clean it up, replace a few things and make it presentable to sell it faster?
Terri

Dave Ramsey
Dave Ramsey

Dear Terri,
It’s really up to you guys, because both options — whether you’re sitting on the house or rehabbing it — are going to take time and emotional energy. From a real estate person’s perspective, houses always sell better when they’re shined up and looking nice. When a prospective buyer walks in and sees and smells new carpet and fresh paint, they don’t have strain their imaginations looking past everything. When you force potential buyers to look past things, it usually ends up costing you money.

In most cases, if you spend $10,000 you gain more than what you put into the house. Honestly, I think one of the numbers you’ve given me is wrong — either the $85,000, the $75,000 or the $10,000 you think it will take to fix up the place. In other words, if you spend $10,000 on a project like this, you’ll usually gain $20,000 when you’re talking about stuff like a thorough cleaning, new carpet and flooring, fresh paint and basics like that. My guess is if the place is worth $85,000 fixed up it’ll probably bring about $65,000 as-is.

If it’s me, I’m going to clean the place and fix it up. I’ve done hundreds, if not thousands, of these kinds of deals, and I can’t stand to try and sell something that’s dumpy, grungy and out of shape.
—Dave

Dave Ramsey is America’s trusted voice on money and business. He has authored five New York Times best-selling books: Financial Peace, More Than Enough, The Total Money Makeover, EntreLeadership and Smart Money Smart Kids. The Dave Ramsey Show is heard by more than 8 million listeners each week on more than 500 radio stations. Follow Dave on Twitter at @DaveRamsey and on the web at daveramsey.com.

INSIGHT KANSAS: Who is the real fraud?

MSmith2 edit
Michael A. Smith is an associate professor of political science at Emporia State University.

There is real voter fraud going on in Kansas and across America. Ironically, the perpetrator is Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, a noted voter-fraud alarmist, joined by his allies. Their goal is not to fraudulently cast votes, but to fraudulently suppress them.

Last Sunday, I appeared on a television program immediately following an interview with Kobach. His claim that “there haven’t been any studies on voter fraud” left me astonished. In fact, extensive reports are available online from New York University’s Brennan Center For Justice, among others. Here are the facts:

Researchers have found few documented voter-fraud cases around the country during the past 10 years. Urban legends about deceased people voting are generally due either to a voter dying later in the same year after the election, or two voters (out of hundreds of thousands) sharing both name and birthday. Stories about votes being cast where no house is located are typically due to the voter living in an apartment or group home, someplace not zoned for single-family houses. Myths about undocumented workers registering and voting are unsubstantiated. For example, Kobach’s famous claims regarding voter fraud by Somali immigrants in Kansas City, Mo., involve an election with only two proven cases of voter fraud: both by relatives of one candidate, caught and successfully prosecuted without proof-of-citizenship or photo ID laws.

Kobach’s laws suppress votes, not fraud. I recently completed research with Insight Kansas colleague Chapman Rackaway and Kevin Anderson of Eastern Illinois University. Analyzing the change in turnout between 2008 and 2012, and accounting for other factors, we estimate that a county with 30 percent poverty will experience a voter turnout drop of more than 3 percent due to the proof-of-citizenship laws Kobach favors. Indeed, under such a law, Kansas fell from 28th to 36th among the states for voter turnout between 2008 and 2012: America’s third-largest drop. Democrats usually suffer the effects. Other research finds similar effects for photo ID laws.

Related story: Study shows voter-ID laws cut turnout by blacks, young.

The annual Kansas Speaks survey now asks, “Were you prevented from registering by a proof-of-citizenship law?” and “Were you prevented from voting by a photo ID law?” In 2013, seven respondents answered yes to the first question, and seven more said yes to the second: a total of 14 respondents in a survey of 944 people. Just shy of 1.5 percent, this percentage is far larger than the margin by which many close elections are determined.

The real voter fraud here is Kobach and his allies’ trumped-up claims of fraud, used to justify policies suppressing legitimate votes. Ruling on similar laws in Wisconsin, that state’s courts have determined that the cost of obtaining a birth certificate constitutes a poll tax, which is forbidden by both the U.S. and Wisconsin constitutions.

Also, Kobach ally Americans for Prosperity was caught last week mailing fraudulent voter-registration cards in North Carolina, which contained incorrect instructions and were mailed to many ineligible voters, including a cat and a child that would be four and a half years old had she not died two years ago.

It is time to ask, who are the ones really perpetrating voter fraud?

News From the Oil Patch

oilpatchbanner

By JOHN P. TRETBAR
October 6th, 2014

Oil prices continued their free fall in early Monday trading. Mymex contracts lost another 74 cents per barrel at $89.00. London Brent was down 85 cents at $91.46/bbl. Friday’s closing price for Kansas Common at NCRA was $79.50 per barrel. The last time that price closed below $80 was on April 23rd of last year.

Saudi Aramco cut prices last week by about a dollar per barrel to Asia, and by 40 cents a barrel to the United States. That sends a strong signal that Saudi Arabia is more interested in maintaining market share than in defending prices.

Baker Hughes reported 1,922 active drilling rigs nationwide, which was down two from last Friday. Canada had 430, down one. The count in Kansas was 24, down one from last week. Independent Oil & Gas reported 125 active rigs in Kansas, 31 pending their next location assignment and 78 stacked or idle. There were 40 active rigs reported in eastern Kansas, up three, and 85 west of Wichita, down one.

‘News from the Oil Patch’ ADVERTISING OPPORTUNITIES AVAILABLE.
Click here to get your ad in front of your customers’ eyes.

The Kansas Corporation Commission reported 622 new intent to drill notices during the month of September. That’s up from 588 in August and 574 in September of last year. There were ten intents filed in Barton County last month, 14 in Ellis County, 12 in Russell County and three in Stafford County.

Independent Oil & Gas Service reported 66 well completions last week, for a year-to-date total of 4,464 across Kansas. Last week there were 45 completions noted in eastern Kansas, and 21 west of Wichita.

There were 141 drilling permits issued for new locations in Kansas last week, bringing the total this year to 5,640. There were 89 new permits east of Wichita and 52 in western Kansas, including four in Ellis County and two in Russell County.

The president of Turkey insists that the fight against the Islamic State is his country’s top priority but there is growing evidence Turkey is helping Islamic State smuggle it’s oil. The Turkish Energy Minister says his country wouled never partake in any illegal transactions. There are no firm numbers for oil being smuggled from Syria, but in the first six months of this year, the Turks have seized more than 486,000 barrels of illicit crude.

AP and ABC are reporting on a big crackdown on oil smuggling along Turkey’s border with Syria. What used to be a lucrative sideline for the locals has become big business for Islamic State. authorities, smugglers and vendors say business was booming until about six months ago. when Turkish authorities ramped up a multi-layered crackdown to disrupt the illicit trade. According to the AP report, the Turks have beefed up border controls and arrested dozens of smugglers. They’re also reportedly going after consumers with an extensive stop-and-search operation on Turkish highways were fueld tanks are tested for smuggled oil.

The AP reports on a company called Energy Intelligence, whose president wants to expand the use of drone aircraft to monitor oil pipelines in North Dakota. Currently, pipelines are checked for problems by occasional manned aircraft flyovers, on-the-ground observations by foot or vehicle, and production loss reports…some use fiber-optic early warning systems. But experts say those methods still “pretty archaic,” and often leave underground spills undiscovered for days. The firm hopes to begin test flights this fall.

The state task force looking at Kansas earthquakes has submitted its action plan to Governor Brownback. The Seismic Action Plan consists of two major components – a plan for enhanced seismic monitoring and a response plan. The group recommends installation of a strategically-located permanent monitoring network, and a portable seismic array to provide a closer look at localized earthquakes. The report from Te Kansas Geological Survey, Kansas Department of Health and Environment and the Kansas Corporation Commission provides background from national studies linking seismic activity to fluid injection, but the task force says it has no conclusive evidence linking fluid injection to specific seismic events in Kansas. Thus far in 2014, the U.S. Geological Survey’s National Earthquake Information Center has recorded 58 earthquakes, ranging from magnitude 1.3 to 3.8, nearly all in Sumner, Harper, and Barber counties.

BP is challenging a federal judge’s finding of gross negligence in the Gulf Oil Spill, saying he based the ruling on expert testimony he said he wouldn’t consider. The ruling exposes the oil company to as much as $18 billion in fines. In court documents filed Thursday, the oil company asked the judge to change his finding or grant a new trial.

Copyright Eagle Radio | FCC Public Files | EEO Public File