We have a brand new updated website! Click here to check it out!

Brownback, State GOP burn through $330K fighting over raising taxes

Screen Shot 2013-05-23 at 7.40.48 AM

May 31, 2013

The Kansas Legislature’s overtime bill hit $330,000 today with no resolution on taxes or a budget. And Gov. Brownback and Kansas Republicans can only blame themselves for this wasteful spending.

The majority party has spent nearly three weeks fighting over how best to raise taxes on working Kansans and after multiple rounds of failed votes have only a growing overtime bill to show for their efforts.

They have manged to pass a resolution praising Kansas State coaches, another resolution lamenting the pressing issue of discrimination against Christian soldiers in the United States military, and restarted a fight to block state-created Common Core Education Standards. Upon reflection, it may have been better to just set the whole $330K on fire opposed to giving the legislature nearly two weeks of free time to sow more unnecessary or harmful legislation.

That money that the legislature is spending on themselves in the form of overtime pay could have gone to any number of worthier causes. Off the top of our head, here are a few better uses for $330,000 taxpayer dollars.

The Kansas Legislature’s wasted $330,000 could have been spent to:

Hire ten new teachers
Hire eight new Kansas Highway Patrol troopers
Purchase over 5,000 textbooks for Kansas students
Distribute over $1,000 to every Kansas school district
Move eight disabled Kansans off waiting lists for Medicaid services.
Facing a projected budget deficit of $802 million caused by the worst tax plan in America, Kansas legislators need to protect every taxpayer dollar jealously so we can continue funding the priorities that matter to Kansans: strong schools, safe communities, and quality infrastructure.

But instead of spending these funds wisely to improve our state, Gov. Brownback and GOP legislators have squandered $330,000 on overtime pay for themselves protecting tax breaks for billionaires.

Worst of all? There’s no clear end in sight, meaning Kansas taxpayers will be on the hook for thousands more in overtime pay to a group of legislators incapable of doing the job they are paying themselves to do.

Commentary: GM wheat sprouts another round of Monsanto criticism

Greg Henderson, Editor, Associate Publisher, Drovers CattleNetwork

It hasn’t been a good week for Monsanto. Over the Memorial Day weekend, protesters rallied in dozens of U.S. cities against the company for the genetically modified seeds it produces. Organizers claim the “March Against Monsanto” protests were held in 436 cities in 52 countries.

The ink was barely dry on newspapers reporting those protests when the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service announced that a genetically-modified, glyphosate-resistant wheat variety was found in volunteer wheat growing on a farm in Oregon. “Roundup Ready” crops have been genetically modified to include a gene that works to make that crop resistant to the broad-spectrum herbicide glyphosate, also known by its branded name, Roundup.

Those wheat sprouts were big news because the USDA never approved GM wheat, and many of America’s trading partners are opposed to GM crops. Grain traders immediately warned that the discovery could hurt export prospects for U.S. wheat.

Indeed, half of U.S.-grown wheat is exported, and major buyers include Japan, Mexico, Europe, South Korea, Egypt, Nigeria and the Philippines. Reuters reported on Thursday that Japan has already cancelled a tender offer to buy U.S. western white wheat, while other Asian wheat buyers were said to be closely monitoring the situation.

“We will refrain from buying western white and feed wheat effective today,” Toru Hisadome, a Japanese farm ministry official in charge of wheat trading, told Reuters.

Cattlemen who remember the Japanese response to America’s first incidence of BSE 10 years ago may not be surprised to their response to the GM wheat incident. Still, the Japanese response is an over-reaction that needlessly scares consumers and further sullies Monsanto’s reputation (more on that later).

But there’s a huge difference between the BSE case of December 2003 and the GM wheat incident. There was actually a cow discovered that had BSE. It didn’t enter the food chain, and the incident provided evidence that safety programs designed to protect our food supply worked. But we didn’t find GM wheat grain. The discovery was GM wheat sprouts. That’s a long ways from grain destined for export.

The discovery of the GM wheat was made by an Oregon farmer who took to the field this spring to kill volunteer wheat sprouts by spraying them with glyphosate, and some of the sprouts unexpectedly survived. Scientists found the wheat was a strain field-tested from 1998 to 2005 and deemed safe before Monsanto withdrew it from the regulatory approval process. Today, no GM wheat varieties are approved for general planting in the U.S. or elsewhere.

U.S. farmers, and many around the world, have embraced the technology of GM corn, soybeans and cotton. The majority of those crops grown in the U.S. are the genetically modified-varieties.

For its part, Monsanto has pledged to cooperate fully with the USDA investigation into the incident in Oregon. The company, however, is likely bracing for another round of piling on by the media. Much of that criticism is unwarranted.

(Full disclosure: Drovers/CattleNetwork receives no advertising or PR money from Monsanto.)

Despite wide-spread scientific assurances about the safety of GM crops (including the Food and Drug Administration’s confirmation of the food and feed safety of Roundup Ready wheat), Monsanto decided to end its GM wheat program nine years ago because it was concerned buyers of U.S. wheat would reject the technology and hurt the U.S. wheat market.

“While USDA’s results are unexpected, there is considerable reason to believe that the presence of the Roundup Ready trait in wheat, if determined to be valid, is very limited,” the company said.

In summary, we have the discovery of some wheat sprouts that may be from a strain on which field research was discontinued nine years ago. Since that time over 500 million acres of wheat have been planted in the U.S. without any other incidents. Further, the company in question has pledged to assist in the investigation into these sprouts which did not produce grain which did not enter the export market.

The only thing this incident appears to have produced is more fodder for critics of Monsanto and GM technology.

 

Mixed market signals affecting cattle markets

Mixed market signals affecting cattle markets

Derrell Peel, Oklahoma State University Extension

It has been difficult this spring to get cattle and beef markets all operating on the same page. Choice boxed beef, which capped wholesale values below $200/cwt. for more than a year, finally punched through the ceiling on May 2 and posted a strong May run culminating in record highs of $211.37/cwt. on Thursday prior to Memorial Day. While Choice boxed beef is likely to drop from the pre-Memorial Day highs, the question is one of how far and how fast wholesale beef prices may drop in the coming weeks. In any event, the strength in Choice boxed beef sets the stage for stronger summer beef demand.
Packers have enjoyed better margins recently as fed cattle prices have not responded in similar fashion as boxed beef prices rose. However, it is important to remember that virtually all of the wholesale beef price increase has been in the Choice market. The Choice-Select spread has widened which limits the impact of higher wholesale values in the fed cattle market. While Choice boxed beef values have increased over $10/cwt. in May, the wider Choice-Select spread limits the potential increase in fed cattle price to less than $4/cwt. Despite the potential, fed cattle prices have weakened from highs at the beginning of May to current levels under $125/cwt. May into June is a difficult period for a fed cattle rally as slaughter numbers increase seasonally. The last three weeks, fed slaughter (steers and heifers) has increased over 4 percent compared to the previous several weeks. However, steer and heifer slaughter in May is down nearly 3 percent from the same period last year. Unexpectedly large beef cow slaughter since mid-March has contributed to more seasonal slaughter pressure in May. If boxed beef holds stronger into the summer, fed cattle prices will likely maintain higher summer values than are currently expected.
Feeder cattle prices have been on the defensive all spring due to a combination of demand and supply factors. Feedlot demand for feeders has been tempered this spring under the weight of record corn prices and continuing feeding losses. The prospects for sharply lower corn prices should support feedlot demand for feeder cattle into the third quarter of the year. Recent concerns over delayed corn plantings were largely erased with the tremendous corn plantings progress in the past two weeks. Larger feedlot placements in March and April reflected the continuing effects of drought reduced forage supplies and lingering winter weather. The jump in placements was more a question of short term timing than a trend for coming months. May placements will likely be down as feeder supplies continue to tighten for the remainder of the year. Poor forage conditions and delayed forage growth continues to prompt beef cow liquidation and limit summer stocker demand. Recent warm weather and improved moisture conditions in many regions is expected to pull beef cow slaughter down and jump start some summer stocker demand.

Seek Shade, Not Sun

Seek shade, not sun

By John Schlageck, Kansas Farm BureauInsight

The next time you take a few minutes out of the sun, dust off one of those old family albums. You know the ones that date back to the ‘20s, ‘30s, ‘40s and even late ‘50s.

If your family farmed, you’ll see photos of your relatives attired in wide-brimmed hats. Look at their shirts. They wore loose-fitting, long-sleeved, light-colored garments.

Now fast-forward to the photographs of the mid-‘60s. Clothing styles changed. You don’t see too many long-sleeved shirts any longer. Broad-brimmed hats have been replaced with baseball caps proclaiming seed, feed, tractors, and organizations – just about any company logo under the sun.

Today’s farmer no longer wears the clothing of yesteryear – clothing that afforded protection from the sun’s harmful ultra-violet rays. Instead he wears a smaller, softer, snug-fitting cap that will not blow off and bump into machinery. Farmers prefer their hats to be inexpensive or free, and they like them colorful.

While the ball cap is comfortable and affordable, it does not protect the temples, the tender, delicate ear tips and the back of the neck. The baseball cap doesn’t extend far enough to offer protection against the sun.

Health specialists in the agricultural field have been tracking skin cancer and the sun’s harmful impact on farmers and other segments of society since 1983. While the number of deaths from skin cancer remains small, the amount of tumors has increased significantly according to family physicians who treat farmers in rural communities.

Ultra-violet rays are one of the leading causes of cancer on farms today, researchers say. But with early diagnosis, treatment is possible. Farmers and ranchers should insist on inspection for skin cancer as part of their regular check-ups.

Without protective measures, sun will eventually result in skin cancer. Dermatologists recommend that anyone working or playing in the sunshine protect their skin completely by wearing clothing and a wide-brimmed hat.

The American Cancer Society will tell you there is a skin cancer epidemic. The number of cases is rising faster than any other tumor being studied today.

“If current trends continue, one in five Americans will get skin cancer in their lifetime, and many of these skin cancers could be prevented by reducing UV exposure from the sun and indoor tanning devices,” says Tom Frieden Centers for Disease Control director. “Of particular concern is the increase we are seeing in rates of melanoma, a potentially deadly form of skin cancer. In the United States, melanoma is one of the most common cancers among people ages 15 to 29 years.”

Spending time in the sun increases the risk of skin cancer. Everyone can sunburn and suffer harmful effects of exposure to UV radiation. People can protect themselves by choosing a sunscreen that is right for them, wearing protective clothing and limiting time in the sun.

Youngsters and young adults must be educated today. If they learn about the sun’s dangerous rays at an early age and practice prevention, skin cancer can be avoided in later years.

Seek shade when the sun’s rays are strongest; avoid sunburns, intentional tanning, and use of tanning beds; use extra caution near reflective surfaces like water and sand.

Farmers, ranchers – just about anyone who works or plays in the sun should avoid direct exposure from 10 a.m. until about 3 p.m. in the Midwest.

If you can’t wear a wide-brimmed hat and protective clothing, apply at least a SPF 30 sun protective lotion. Today’s farmers and ranchers would be well-advised to take a page out of their family albums – to return to those days of floppy, wide-brimmed straw hats and long-sleeved, cotton shirts.

Who knows, maybe they could start a new fashion craze as well as protect their skin from the damaging rays of the sun.

John Schlageck is a leading commentator on agriculture and rural Kansas. Born and raised on a diversified farm in northwestern Kansas, his writing reflects a lifetime of experience, knowledge and passion.

Book Review – Louise: Amended

Book Review – Louise: Amended (Author Louise Krug)Louise Amended

A beautiful young woman from Kansas is about to embark on the life of her dreams—California! Glossy journalism! French boyfriend!—only to suffer a brain bleed that collapses the right side of her body, leaving her with double vision, facial paralysis, and a dragging foot. An unflinching, wise, and darkly funny portrait of sudden disability and painstaking recovery, the memoir presents not only Louise’s perspective, but also the reaction of her loved ones.

Louise Krug shamelessly takes you inside her early twenties, when she experienced something that most people don’t ever expect to happen to them. What was it like for her boyfriend when he had to start bathing her? How do her parents cope? Krug then leads you through how she ultimately overcomes her destiny and embarks on a life more full than she could have imagined at 22.

5 out of 5 stars.

Marleah Augustine is the Adult Department Librarian at the Hays Public Library

You can see more of her blog here    https://hayspubliclibrary.wordpress.com 

 

Moran’s Memo: Courage Defined

Moran’s Memo: Courage Defined
By Senator Jerry Moran Moran
Courage is often talked about but seldom witnessed. On Memorial Day each year, America comes together to remember those courageous souls who inspire us all – those who answered the call to serve our county and laid down their lives for our freedom.

One such soldier, Father Emil Kapaun, was born in Pilsen, Kansas, in 1916 and served our country on the battlefields of the Korean War as a chaplain for the 8th Calvary Regiment of the First Army Division. Father Kapaun’s courageous actions in Korea saved countless lives as he risked his own to drag the wounded to safety while dodging explosions and enemy gunfire. When he was taken prisoner in 1950, he continued to live out the Army Chaplain motto – “for God and Country.”

In the bitter cold of winter, Father Kapaun carried injured comrades on his back as Chinese captors led them on forced marches through the snow and ice, gave away his meager food rations, and cared for the sick who were suffering alongside him in the prison camp. He also provided spiritual aid and comfort; on Easter, he defied his communist captors by conducting Mass with a makeshift crucifix. When all else looked hopeless, Father Kapaun rallied his comrades to persevere – until his own death as a prisoner in 1951.

Since 2009, my colleagues in the United States Congress and I worked together to make certain his countless acts of heroism would be recognized. In 2011, Sen. Roberts and I introduced legislation to award Father Kapaun the Congressional Medal of Honor. On April 11, 2013 – more than 60 years after laying down his life for the sake of others – Father Kapaun finally received our nation’s highest award of valor. I was honored to attend the Congressional Medal of Honor Ceremony at the White House, where his nephew, Ray Kapaun, accepted the Medal on his uncle’s behalf.

Father Kapaun has inspired many with his unshakable faith and relentless courage. His story of self-sacrifice demonstrates that the strength of our nation lies within its people. Only when each citizen feels the duty to do his or her part will our nation be strengthened. This won’t come as a result of our individual successes, but in what we accomplish together.

Often in Washington, it can be easy to forget what’s important in the midst of all the partisan politics, the next election or the latest poll. When I need a reminder, I take a walk – from the Capitol to the Lincoln Memorial. Between these two points, I pass the WWII Memorial, Vietnam Wall, and Korean War Memorial.

These memorials to our service members help put everything in perspective. Our freedoms are so important that our nation’s sons and daughters put their lives at risk to defend and protect them. Like Father Kapaun, these men and women didn’t sacrifice for Republicans or Democrats; they gave their lives for the greater good of our country and to make certain their children and grandchildren would also experience freedom and liberty.

One of the memorials that has special meaning for me is the World War II Memorial. In 2004, I visited this memorial a few days before the official dedication ceremony. As I walked among the many pillars, I came across the pillar representing the many Kansans who served, and I thought of my dad. He served in northern Africa and up the boot heel of Italy during the Second World War.

As I turned to leave, I called my Dad and said: “I’m at the World War II Memorial and I thought of you. I respect you, I thank you for your service, and I love you.” It was something that sons don’t often say to their fathers, but there is something about memorials that makes us stop and reflect on all those who sacrificed so much to make certain we can continue to live in the strongest, freest and greatest nation in the world.

On Memorial Day, we honor the courageous souls who laid down their lives for our country and we thank God for giving us these heroes. Let us commit our lives to preserving this nation for the sake of the next generation – so they too can pursue the American dream with freedom and liberty.

This week at Hays Rec

DEADLINES FOR MAY 29TH
If a class is full PLEASE put your name on the waiting list. We always do our best to accommodate everyone so if you are not on the waiting list and we add an Hays Rec Logoadditional class you will miss out!

WE HAVE 27 DEADLINES THE WEEK! BELOW IS A LIST OF THE DEADLINES AND THE AGES, FOR DESCRIPTIONS PLEASE GO TO WWW.HAYSREC.ORG OR GIVE OUR OFFICE AT CALL AT 785-623-2650.

BABY TAS (0-2 YEAR OLDS)
Little Sparks – 8 months -24 months
Parent Keepsake – 3-24 months with an adult
Music Sparks Sharing – Gardening – 18 months – 5 years w/an adult
Storytime Station – 18-24 months w/an adult

TINY TAS (2-5 YEAR OLDS)
Beginning Ballet – 4–8 year olds
Bug Bash – 3-5 year olds
Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs – 2-5 w/an adult
Little Lotus Yoga – 2-4 years
Miniature Horse Tour – 2 and older w/an adult
Music Sparks Sharing – Gardening – 18 months – 5 years w/an adult

TWEEN TAS (5 & OLDER)
School’s Out – Big Time Summer – 6-12 year olds
Bead Drum (art) – 5 & older
Beginning Ballet – 4–8 year olds
Drum Alive – 5-11 year olds
Miniature Horse Tour – 2 and older w/an adult
Photo Adventures Day Camp – 8-12 year olds
Pottery Works – 5 & older
Tumbling for Tweens – 8-11 year olds
Yoga for Kids – 5-12 year olds
Youth Aikido (Active Learners) – 5-9 year olds
Youth Aikido (Traditional) – 6-14 year olds

SPECIAL POPS
To participate in these activities, a person must:
-be diagnosed with intellectual disabilities
-have a significant learning or vocational problem

Adapted Day Camp – 7-13 year olds in the USD 489 Special Ed program
JAM – Just Add Music – All Ages

ADULT LEISURE
Adult Aikido
Aikido Stretches & Motion
Beginners Shot Gun Shooting for Ladies
Kanine Kollege
Savory Summertime Delights

WELLNESS
Aquathlon – 16 & older

YOUTH SPORTS
Pee Wee T-Ball

BICKLE-SCHMIDT SPORTS COMPLEX
NBC Baseball Points Tournament

UPCOMING DEADLINES
June 5
HRC Swim lessons – Session 1
Tennis Lessons
Father’s Day Bagels, A Parent/Child Cooking Venture
British Challenger Soccer Camp – sign up online at challengersports.com
Couple’s Cooking
Embellished Cell Phone Pocket
Fun & Fitness
Glow Art
HRC Youth Basketball Camp
Little Apple Shopping Trip
Little Swimmers
McKids Day at Larks Park
School’s Out – Picnic
Tiny Tot Olympians
Travel Lunch to Ellinwood
ASA Summer Swing Fast Pitch Tournament

State’s Policies on Healthcare Exclude the Poor

State’s Policies on Healthcare Exclude the Poor

The refusal by about half the states to expand Medicaid will leave millions of poor people ineligible for government-subsidized health insurance under President Barack Obama’s health care law even as many others with higher incomes receive federal subsidies to buy insurance.

Starting next month, the administration and its allies will conduct a nationwide campaign encouraging Americans to take advantage of new high-quality, affordable insurance options. But those options will be unavailable to some of the neediest people in states like Texas, Florida, Kansas, Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi and Georgia, which are refusing to expand Medicaid.

More than half of all people without health insurance live in states that are not planning to expand Medicaid.

People in those states who have incomes from the poverty level up to four times that amount ($11,490 to $45,960 a year for an individual) can get federal tax credits to subsidize the purchase of private health insurance.

But many people below the poverty line will be unable to get tax credits, Medicaid or other help with health insurance.

Sandy Praeger, the insurance commissioner of Kansas, said she would help consumers understand their options. She said, however, that many of “the poorest of the poor” will fall into a gap in which no assistance is available.

The Kansas Medicaid program provides no coverage for able-bodied childless adults. And adults with dependent children are generally ineligible if their income exceeds 32 percent of the poverty level, Praeger said.

In most cases, she said, adults with incomes from 32 percent to 100 percent of the poverty level ($6,250 to $19,530 for a family of three) “will have no assistance.” They will see advertisements promoting new insurance options, but in most cases will not learn that they are ineligible until they apply.

Administration officials said they worried that frustrated consumers might blame Obama rather than Republicans like Gov. Rick Perry of Texas and Gov. Bobby Jindal of Louisiana, who have resisted the expansion of Medicaid.

The Congressional Budget Office estimates that 25 million people will gain insurance under the new health care law. Researchers at the Urban Institute estimate that 5.7 million uninsured adults with incomes below the poverty level could also gain coverage except that they live in states that are not expanding Medicaid.

In approving the health care law in 2010, congressional Democrats intended to expand Medicaid eligibility in every state.

But the Supreme Court ruled last year that the expansion was an option for states, not a requirement. At least 25 states – mainly those with Republican governors or Republican-controlled legislatures – have balked at expanding the program, in part because of concerns about long-term costs.

Several Republican governors, like Rick Scott in Florida, wanted to expand Medicaid, but met resistance from state legislators.

Obama and administration officials, including Kathleen Sebelius, the secretary of health and human services, plan to fly around the country this summer promoting the health care law to a public largely unaware of the new insurance options.

Bee Moorhead, the executive director of Texas Impact, an interfaith group that favors the expansion of coverage, said: “A lot of people will come in, file applications and find they are not eligible for help because they are too poor. We’ll have to tell them, ‘If only you had a little more money, you could get insurance subsidies, but because you are so poor, you cannot get anything.’

“That’s an odd message, a very strange message. And if people are sick, they will be really upset.”

In Atlanta, Amanda Ptashkin, the director of outreach and advocacy at Georgians for a Healthy Future, a consumer group, said: “Hundreds of thousands of people with incomes below the poverty level would be eligible for Medicaid if the state decided to move forward with the expansion of Medicaid. As things now stand, they will not be eligible for anything. What do we do for them? What do we tell them?”

Jonathan E. Chapman, the executive director of the Louisiana Primary Care Association, which represents more than two dozen community health centers, described the situation in his state this way: “If the breadwinner in a family of four works full time at a job that pays $14 an hour and the family has no other income, he or she will be eligible for insurance subsidies. But if they make $10 an hour, they will not be eligible for anything.”

Bruce Lesley, the president of First Focus, a child advocacy group, said: “In states that do not expand Medicaid, some of the neediest people will not get coverage. But people who are just above the poverty line or in the middle class can get subsidized coverage. People will be denied assistance because they don’t make enough money. Trying to explain that will be a nightmare.”

The subsidies, for the purchase of private insurance, will vary with income and are expected to average more than $5,000 a year in 2014 for each person who qualifies.

Evan S. Dillard, the chief executive of Forrest General Hospital in Hattiesburg, Miss., said the eligibility rules would be “very confusing to working poor individuals in this, the poorest state in the country.”

Starting in January, most Americans will be required to have health insurance and will be subject to tax penalties if they go without coverage. However, the penalties will not apply to low-income people denied access to Medicaid because they live in states that chose not to expand eligibility.

Deborah H. Tucker, the chief executive of Whatley Health Services, a community health center in Tuscaloosa, Ala., said it was wonderful that many uninsured people would gain coverage, but “tragic that some of the most vulnerable, lowest-income people” would be excluded.

Tucker said her clinics cared for nearly 30,000 patients a year, including 16,000 who were uninsured. More than 75 percent of the uninsured patients have incomes below the poverty level and are unlikely to qualify for Medicaid or subsidies, she said.

The Obama administration is urging people who “need health insurance” to report their telephone numbers and email addresses to the government through a website, healthcare.gov, so they can be notified of new insurance options.

Consumers will not necessarily know whether they are eligible for premium tax credits, Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program.

So if a person applies for one program, federal and state officials will check eligibility for all three.

People who are currently eligible but not enrolled may sign up for Medicaid, even in states that do not expand the program.

Freedom to report news needs freedom to gather it

Freedom to report news needs freedom to gather it
By Gene Policinski
 
  
In the months ahead, that basic concept – so central to the First Amendment’s protection of a free press – will also be at the heart of the ongoing debate over how far government officials may go in pursuit of those responsible for “leaking” classified information to journalists.
 
The debate kicked off new fervor with disclosure of a wide search conducted by the Department of Justice in which it seized phone records of The Associated Press that spanned two months, multiple offices and even some personal lines.
 
The bushel-basket, clandestine nature of the seizure meant AP was not given the opportunity to argue for even a more-focused search on a specific leak – leaving the work of up to 100 journalists on multiple stories exposed to government scrutiny.
 
Then there was the outright label of criminal conduct, as a “co-conspirator and/or aider and abettor,” attached by an FBI agent to James Rosen, chief Washington correspondent for Fox News.  Justice Department officials apparently believe Rosen solicited confidential information from a U.S. State Department source about a 2009 pending North Korean missile launch.
 
In seeking a search warrant in 2010 to secretly examine Rosen’s e-mails, the agent said the journalist’s tactics included “employing flattery” and playing to the source’s “vanity and ego.” The source later was indicted, and reportedly the FBI riffled through Rosen’s e-mails for at least 30 days, along with phone data and computer records of Rosen’s trips in and out of the U.S. State Department buildings.
 
Mass collection of journalists’ phone call information. Threats of “criminal liability” aimed at reporters who get information from confidential sources in the government. The idea that “flattery” equals espionage.
 
Combined with an unprecedented six prosecutions for alleged leaks – double the number under all previous administrations combined – it all adds up to a not-so-subtle message: “Don’t ask, don’t tell.”
 
But asking official sources to tell what they know, on or off-the-record, is essential to the role of a free press as an independent source of information about the government’s inner workings.
 
Conscientious whistleblowers in recent years have alerted fellow citizens to morally questionable interrogation tactics and potentially illegal wiretapping of phone conversations, and spurred publicly outcry over issues such as the Pentagon’s failure to provide in a timely manner and in sufficient numbers, supplies of available, mine-resistant vehicles to U.S. troops in the Middle East.
 
The basic question of how a free press must function will again complicate a renewed push in Congress for a so-called shield law – the “Free Flow of Information Act.” In setting out when a journalist may choose not to tell the name of a confidential source, and perhaps when the government may not ask, the methods of newsgathering will be front and center. 
 
Any such law also will have to address First Amendment concerns over becoming a back-door form of official “licensing” of who is entitled to the full rights of a free press.
The Associated Press’ CEO Gary Pruitt, in his letter to the Department of Justice objecting to the records seizure, said that if the practice went unchallenged, the long-term result would be “the people of the United States will only know what the government wants them to know … That’s not what the framers of the Constitution had in mind when they wrote the First Amendment.”
As some draw a connection between the AP and Rosen flaps to the Nixon anti-press era, it’s also instructive as this national debate continues to consider the words in 1971 of U.S. District Judge Murray Gurfein. 
 
In his first days as a federal judge in the Southern District of York, Gurfein rejected the initial government attempt to stop The New York Timesfrom publishing the “Pentagon Papers.” In his ruling, he said:
 
“The security of the Nation is not at the ramparts alone. Security also lies in the value of our free institutions. A cantankerous press, an obstinate press, an ubiquitous press, must be suffered by those in authority in order to preserve the even greater values of freedom of expression and the right of the people to know.  These are troubled times.  There is no greater safety valve for discontent and cynicism about the affairs of government than freedom of expression in any form.”
 
True then. True now.
Gene Policinski is senior vice president and executive director of the First Amendment Center. Email him at [email protected]

Kansas Profile: Now That’s Rural

Kansas Profile – Now That’s RuralKSU research and Extension
Jason Wiebe Dairy

By Ron Wilson, director of the Huck Boyd National Institute for Rural Development at Kansas State University.

Sharp. Extra sharp. Those terms might describe a pencil or a razor, but in this case, they describe flavors of cheese. Today we’ll learn about an innovative dairyman who is adding value to his milk by making artisan cheese on his own farm.

Jason and Sheri Wiebe are owners of Jason Wiebe Dairy near Durham, Kan. Jason is the third generation of his family on this place. His grandparents moved here in the late 1920s and started milking cows, meaning that cows have been milked on this place for more than 80 years.

Jason started milking his own cows at age 17 and eventually moved into ownership of the family farm. By 1999, he was looking to add value to the dairy enterprise.

“We started making cheese in our kitchen,” he said. Friends and family liked the cheese, so the Wiebes expanded. They converted a small building near the dairy barn into their cheese production facility. Jason now commutes to this facility daily – it’s a 20-second walk from his house.

In later years, the Wiebes called on Kevin Herbel of K-State’s Kansas Farm Management Association who provided financial advice for the farm.

In February 2003, the Wiebes got their inspections, gained their permit and became a licensed cheese production plant. Kevin’s son Aaron Herbel happened to join the business as assistant cheese maker.

The Wiebes now milk 120 cows twice daily. They specialize in natural, artisan cheese produced from their own milk production. Excess milk is marketed to a company in Arkansas.

“All the cheese we make here is from our own milk,” Jason said. Cheese is produced at least two times a week. “If we start by 8:30 in the morning, we can have it in the press by 4:00 that afternoon,” Jason said. “It’s a block of cheese the next morning.” The cheese is refrigerated and some is aged. After aging for nine months, cheeses are considered sharp. After they age for 15 months, cheeses are considered extra sharp.

The Wiebes produce cheese made from both pasteurized milk and raw milk. Jason has found there is growing consumer interest in the raw milk cheese, which some see as a health food.

“My aunt can’t eat pasteurized cheese, but she can eat the raw milk cheese,” said Aaron Herbel.

They market their natural cheese in several flavors: raw milk cheddar, Colby, jalapeño, hot habanero, Cajun, southwest chipotle, dill weed, garlic & herb, and white cheddar with garden vegetable. Yum. They also produce and sell cheese curds.

The Wiebe farm is located where the historic Santa Fe Trail crossed the Cottonwood River in central Kansas. In fact, Wiebe dairy cows literally walk across the ruts left by countless wagon trains more than a century ago.

In October 2010, with help from an international cheese consultant based in St. Louis, the Wiebes launched a new line of product called Cottonwood River Cheddar. Jason is excited about the positive response to this new cheese.

Today, cheese from the Jason Wiebe Dairy is marketed through grocery stores in central Kansas and a 28-store grocery chain in Kansas City, along with sales over the Internet. The Wiebes are literally selling the raw milk cheese coast to coast, from Oregon to Florida. That’s a remarkable achievement for a family-owned dairy near the rural community of Durham, population 114 people. Now, that’s rural.

In 2006, Jason submitted his jalapeno cheddar cheese to a competition at the World Dairy Expo and finished in the top two. That same cheese scored in the top five at the U.S. championships in Wisconsin.

“Our goal is to make the best cheese you have ever eaten,” said the Wiebes’ website. For more information, go to www.jasonwiebedairy.com.

Sharp. Extra sharp. Those terms might apply to razors or pencils, but they also describe flavors of cheese. We commend Jason and Shari Wiebe, Aaron Herbel, and all those involved with Jason Wiebe Dairy for making a difference with their innovation, commitment to quality, and growth in value-added agriculture. In my opinion, when it comes to the cheese business, Jason is sharp. Extra sharp.

State Art Plan Falls Short

Dear Arts Advocate,kansas arts logo
The Kansas Creative Arts Industries Commission (KCAIC) submitted its State Arts Plan to the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) this month.  You can read a copy of it by clicking here.
If the State Arts Plan is approved by the NEA, the state may be eligible for matching federal funds.  Federal funds are critical to the arts in Kansas, as every dollar spent by the state for approved arts programs is matched by the NEA.
While some arts advocates participated in the planning process — although less than 100 people across the state attended a planning meeting —  this plan raises several questions:
1.  How can the KCAIC implement this plan with an annual budget of $200,000, particularly when approximately half of that is allocated to agency staff salaries?
2.  Does the KCAIC have a strategy to increase funding and staff to implement the plan?
3.  What are the plan priorities?
4.  How will success be measured?
Artists, arts organizations and communities want funding, professional development and leadership — and with a reduced budget of $200,000 and a possible federal match of $200,000 — this plan cannot do that.
Contact your state legislator today!
Henry Schwaller
Chair, Kansas Citizens for the Arts

 

Book Review: City – A Guidebook for the Urban Age

cityBook Review: City – A Guidebook for the Urban Age  (Author P.D. Smith)

For the first time in the history of our planet, more than half the population-3.3 billion people-is now living in cities. City is the ultimate guidebook to our urban centers-the signature unit of human civilization. With erudite prose and carefully chosen illustrations, this unique work of metatourism explores what cities are and how they work.

If you enjoy the hustle and bustle of urban areas, you might like this book, modeled after those ubiquitous travel guides featuring a particular metropolis. P. D. Smith takes you through various areas and attractions found in virtually every city: downtown, street food, parks, and transportation, among others. Smith also draws parallels between historic cities and those of today, showing that cities have always been a place for innovation and development.

4 out of 5 stars.

Marleah Augustine is the Adult Department Librarian at the Hays Public Library

You can see more of her blog here    https://hayspubliclibrary.wordpress.com 

Copyright Eagle Radio | FCC Public Files | EEO Public File