By GREG DOERING
Kansas Farm Bureau

Kansas Farm Bureau’s (KFB) brand, Kansas Living, recently launched a campaign promoting the benefits of eating meat I never would have imagined necessary when I was growing up. While it wasn’t always the main attraction, meat was always on our plates for dinner. Oftentimes it was there at lunchtime, too.

Kansas Living’s “Make Mine Meat” campaign encourages the inclusion of all types of animal protein in one’s diet for its high-quality nutritional value.

Personally, I encourage everyone to eat meat because it’s delicious anytime. That’s not a slight to all the tasty, nutritious nonmeat foods out there, either. I’m an indiscriminate omnivore when I sit down at the table. Not every meal features meat, but the ones that do are generally my favorites. Those meals also help fuel my body.

“Animal protein plays an essential role in your diet,” says Eryn Carter, a registered dietitian. “Animal meat products contain all nine essential amino acids that your body cannot produce but needs in order to function.”

The “Make Mine Meat” campaign features athletes who consume meat because its nutritional value supports their active lifestyles. Unfortunately, yours truly wasn’t asked to be a model for this campaign despite my body’s ability to hide most of its athletic features. But that’s more a result of missed gym sessions and my penchant for snacking.

Meat is always on the table for DJ Rezac, who enjoys cooking almost as much as he likes eating. A cyclist, Rezac says he eats meat to power his pedals.

“Meat is muscle,” Rezac says. “If you need muscle, you need to eat meat. That’s maybe an oversimplification, but to me and my diet, red meat is the best source for zinc, iron and protein.”

Rezac’s diet isn’t breaking new ground. Fossil evidence shows humans have been eating meat and bone marrow for millions of years. Evidence of our ancestors’ carnivorous ways has been documented by butchery marks on bones dating back at least 2.6 million years, well before the birth of agriculture in 8000 B.C.

Today, in addition to boosting the performance of countless athletes, meat adds some serious kick to Kansas’ economy. The state is a top producer of meat, specifically pork and beef. Kansas ranks third nationally with 6.35 million cattle and 10th in hog and pig inventory. And it also could put an extra $100 in your grocery cart.

Participants who post a photo of their favorite meat product, recipe or reason they choose to include meat in their diets using the hashtag #MakeMineMeat on Facebook and/or Instagram will be eligible to win one of three $100 gift cards to a local grocery store so winners can purchase great-tasting, high-quality, nutritious meat. Private profiles may send a direct message of their post to Kansas Living’s Facebook or Instagram accounts.

What’s for dinner? On my plate, it’s meat.

“Insight” is a weekly column published by Kansas Farm Bureau, the state’s largest farm organization whose mission is to strengthen agriculture and the lives of Kansans through advocacy, education and service.

Earlier this year, NPR Illinois and Pro Publica conducted an investigation on the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s handling of sexual harassment complaints. What they found, according to the report they published, was that “the university helped several professors keep seemingly unblemished records even though they were found to have violated its policies: letting them resign, paying them for periods they weren’t working, promising not to discuss the reasons for their departures and, in some cases, keeping them on the faculty.”

As a follow up to this investigation, NPR Illinois and ProPublica published an online questionnaire inviting more stories of sexual misconduct at Illinois universities, including incidents where the victims “did not or could not file a report.” The questionnaire asks for names and email addresses, but promises that the information will not be shared without explicit permission.

Within days, the University of Illinois at Springfield, where NPR Illinois is based, informed the station that it couldn’t offer this confidentiality to their sources. Why? Because NPR Illinois is owned by the university, which makes its reporters, technically speaking, university employees. And Title IX requires almost all university employees to report in detail all incidents of sexual violence, sexual harassment or other sexual misconduct to the Title IX coordinator.

Naturally, this is a huge impediment to NPR Illinois being able to continue its investigation into campus sexual misconduct. Confidentiality is crucial to reporting on these cases. As NPR Illinois reporter Mary Hansen says, “Particularly when we’re dealing with people who’ve experienced harassment, they’re pretty reticent to talk to people. You have to do some trust-building first.” This trust is far more difficult to establish when a source knows that everything she/he says will be disclosed to the university (which, I might add, has a poor track record of dealing with such complaints).

NPR Illinois requested that its reporters be exempted from the mandatory reporting requirement, similar to the exemption that the University of Illinois Springfield grants to counseling center employees. When the university denied this request, the station’s leadership wrote an open letter to the university’s president and chancellor beseeching them “to recognize the First Amendment protections of journalists and the editorial independence of our news organization by reconsidering our request for an exemption.”

Does NPR Illinois have a First Amendment right to keep its sources confidential? Many courts have found that the First Amendment provides journalists with a “qualified” privilege to protect their sources, meaning they can only be forced to reveal them under certain circumstances — say, if the government has a compelling interest in obtaining the information and there’s no alternative source for obtaining it. A majority of states, Illinois included, have press shield laws that protect reporters from having to disclose their sources in state court. But what makes this case more complicated is that the University of Illinois isn’t subpoenaing the reporters at NPR Illinois to reveal their sources in court. Rather, it’s making disclosure of those sources a condition of their employment.

That’s another First Amendment issue altogether. The University of Illinois, as a public college, is a government entity. Can it punish its employees for exercising their constitutional rights? The vast majority of cases that consider this question involve incidents where government employees were fired or disciplined for their speech. The law here is complex, but the very general rule of thumb is that you balance the interests of the employee in speaking on a matter of public concern that’s not part of their official duties against the interests of the government in an efficient and disruption-free workplace. It’s difficult for employees to win these cases, because courts tend to defer to the government employer’s judgment regarding when an employee’s free speech undermines its work. But it’s harder to predict what would happen if the dispute between NPR Illinois and the University of Illinois went to court because, quite unusually, it revolves around the free press rights of government employees.

The email denying NPR Illinois’s request for an exemption states that “the university has determined that requiring journalist employees to adhere to the … reporting requirements would not violate any constitutional or other legal protections,” but that certainly isn’t settled law. Nevertheless, the university has a valid and compelling interest in enhancing campus safety by requiring its employees to report incidents of sexual misconduct.

NPR Illinois agrees and says as much in its open letter. It’s not requesting that its reporters should be exempt from mandatory reporting requirements in every circumstance, but specifically when engaged in newsgathering activities. It’s unlikely that such a narrow exemption would open the floodgates for abuse. And the benefit would be that NPR can continue to do the work that journalists are meant to do — hold powerful institutions accountable.

Lata Nott is executive director of the First Amendment Center of the Freedom Forum Institute. Contact her via email at [email protected], or follow her on Twitter at @LataNott.

Popular descriptive words and phrases come and go with generations. When I was a kid they were fairly mundane, like neat, cool or far-out. Evidently a recently concocted phrase is “awesome possum!” I’m always looking and listening for experiences or utterances that might make for a good column, and what outdoor writer worth his or her deer jerky could resist doing something with the phrase “awesome possum.” After watching some British animal rescue show the other night where a pair of baby possums were “rescued” after their mother was hit by a car, Joyce turned to me and blurted out “I want a pet possum.” Put this all together and I would probably be struck dead in my chair if I didn’t follow up with a column on our friend the Virginia Opossum.

There is probably no other critter that garners as much disdain as the lowly Virginia Opossum. They have their place in nature like every other member of God’s creation, but much like the turkey vulture, it’s often tough to see. One of the nicknames given the late country singer George Jones was “the possum,” and he did kinda’ look like one. Trappers hate to find possums in their traps; rather than killing them, my brother and I used to grab the possums by their tale and fling them as far as we could, or simply hold them at arm’s length and punt them over the nearest fence. I guess we figured that, like a boy named Sue, if they had survived to that point, they deserved to live another day.

Surprisingly, possum fur is very soft. Visitors at the Kansas Fur Harvesters booth at the Kansas State Fair usually know which pelt came from the Opossum, but most are also surprised how soft and attractive it is.

The Virginia Opossum is North America’s only marsupial, meaning that like kangaroos, they raise and carry their young in a “marsupian” or pouch. Baby possums exit their mothers pouch at two to three months old, then ride around on her back for another couple months. Possums are generally placid and usually just hiss and show you a mouth full of pointed little teeth. They are not good at defending themselves, and if threatened can fall into a sort of involuntary shock-like state, known as “playing possum.” Just for the record, thinking back on all the encounters I’ve had with possums, I have never witnessed this.

Possums are omnivorous, meaning they will eat almost anything from insects, rodents and fruit, to carrion, and seem especially fond of dog food left in Rovers bowl overnight. A fact making the rounds lately touts the possums help with slowing the spread of Lyme disease by consuming large numbers of ticks, research suggesting as many as 5000 per year. They can adapt to living nearly anywhere they find food, water and shelter, and are perfectly at home in trees. Their bare, boney prehensile tail helps them climb, but they cannot hang from their tail as some traditional stories and drawings suggest.

Going through life as a possum would be a truly humbling experience, maybe an experience we should all have to endure sometime for an hour or so just to put things in perspective…(alright, that made a whole lot more sense when it was just a thought rattling around in my head.) Anyway love em’ or hate em’, possums are survivors, so here’s hoping you have an “awesome possum” day, and Continue to Explore Kansas Outdoors.

Steve Gilliland, Inman, can be contacted by email at [email protected].